Literature DB >> 15486749

Perianal abscess: a pilot study comparing packing with nonpacking of the abscess cavity.

Darren M Tonkin1, Elizabeth Murphy, Mark Brooke-Smith, Paul Hollington, Nicholas Rieger, Simon Hockley, Nigel Richardson, David A Wattchow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Perianal sepsis is traditionally treated by incision and drainage, with packing of the residual cavity until healing. This study was designed to show that perianal abscess may be safely treated by incision and drainage alone.
METHODS: Healing times, analgesic requirements, pain scores, abscess recurrence, and fistula rates were compared between two randomized groups treated with and without packing of perianal abscess cavities.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited (7 lost to follow-up): 20 in the packing and 23 in the nonpacking arm. The groups were comparable in terms of age and gender distribution, type and size of abscess, and the presence of a fistula at operation. Mean healing times were similar ( P = 0.214). The rate of abscess recurrence was similar ( P = 0.61). Postoperative fistula rates were similar ( P = 0.38). Pain scores at the first dressing change were similar ( P = 0.296). Although pain scores appeared much reduced in the nonpacking arm, this did not attain statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study indicates that perianal abscesses can be managed safely without continued packing of the cavity without any obvious complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15486749     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0620-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Packing versus mushroom catheters following incision and drainage in anorectal abscess.

Authors:  Dan Annie Zhu; Lena Mary Houlihan; Helen M Mohan; Morgan McCourt; Emmet Andrews
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  German S3 guideline: anal abscess.

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Marco Sailer; Thomas Schiedeck
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating postoperative packing of the perianal abscess.

Authors:  A P Perera; A M Howell; M H Sodergren; H Farne; A Darzi; S Purkayastha; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Perianal abscess/fistula disease.

Authors:  Mark H Whiteford
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

5.  Management of superficial abscesses: scope for day case surgery.

Authors:  Martha Nixon; Jacob A Akoh
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-05-26

6.  Reviewing perianal abscess management and recurrence: lessons from a trainee perspective.

Authors:  Mina Sarofim; Kevin Ooi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.025

Review 7.  Internal dressings for healing perianal abscess cavities.

Authors:  Stella R Smith; Katy Newton; Jennifer A Smith; Jo C Dumville; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Lyndsay E Pearce; Paul J Barrow; Laura Hancock; James Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  A study assessing postoperative Corrugate Rubber drain of perianal abscess.

Authors:  Riyadh Mohamad Hasan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-09-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.