Literature DB >> 30674526

Cancer screening rates among transgender adults: Cross-sectional analysis of primary care data.

Tara Kiran1, Sam Davie2, Dhanveer Singh3, Sue Hranilovic4, Andrew D Pinto5, Alex Abramovich6, Aisha Lofters7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening between patients who are transgender and those who are cisgender (ie, nontransgender).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: A multisite academic family health team in Toronto, Ont, serving more than 45 000 enrolled patients. PARTICIPANTS: All patients enrolled in the family health team who were eligible for cervical, breast, or colorectal cancer screening. Patients were identified as transgender using an automated search of the practice electronic medical record followed by manual audit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer calculated using data from the electronic medical record and provincial cancer screening registry. Screening rates among the transgender and cisgender populations were compared using 2 tests, and logistic regression modeling was used to understand differences in screening after adjustment for age, neighbourhood income quintile, and number of primary care visits.
RESULTS: A total of 120 transgender patients were identified as eligible for cancer screening. More than 85% of transgender patients eligible for breast cancer screening were assigned male at birth. Transgender patients were less likely than cisgender patients (n = 20 514) were to be screened for cervical (56% vs 72%, P = .001; adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.62), breast (33% vs 65%, P < .001; adjusted OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.59), and colorectal cancer (55% vs 70%, P = .046; adjusted OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.99).
CONCLUSION: In this setting, transgender patients were less likely to receive recommended cancer screening compared with the cisgender population. Future research and quality improvement activities should aim to understand and address potential patient, provider, and system factors. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30674526      PMCID: PMC6347308     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  14 in total

1.  Transgender health in Massachusetts: results from a household probability sample of adults.

Authors:  Kerith J Conron; Gunner Scott; Grace Sterling Stowell; Stewart J Landers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effect of payment incentives on cancer screening in Ontario primary care.

Authors:  Tara Kiran; Andrew S Wilton; Rahim Moineddin; Lawrence Paszat; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  The Future of Transgender Coverage.

Authors:  Kellan E Baker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men.

Authors:  Michael J Johnson; Martina Mueller; Michele J Eliason; Gail Stuart; Lynne S Nemeth
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Social accountability at the micro level: One patient at a time.

Authors:  Ritika Goel; Sandy Buchman; Ryan Meili; Robert Woollard
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Beyond Bathrooms--Meeting the Health Needs of Transgender People.

Authors:  Mark A Schuster; Sari L Reisner; Sarah E Onorato
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Global health burden and needs of transgender populations: a review.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Tonia Poteat; JoAnne Keatley; Mauro Cabral; Tampose Mothopeng; Emilia Dunham; Claire E Holland; Ryan Max; Stefan D Baral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pap test use is lower among female-to-male patients than non-transgender women.

Authors:  Sarah M Peitzmeier; Karishma Khullar; Sari L Reisner; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Addressing health care disparities in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population: a review of best practices.

Authors:  Fidelindo A Lim; Donald V Brown; Sung Min Justin Kim
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.220

10.  Measuring and improving cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening rates in a multi-site urban practice in Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Joshua Feldman; Sam Davie; Tara Kiran
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2017-04-27
View more
  10 in total

1.  Evolving Primary Care Utilization of Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming People at a Community Sexual Health Clinic.

Authors:  Jamieson T Jann; Nicole J Cunningham; Ryan D Assaf; Robyn C Krysiak; David Herman
Journal:  Transgend Health       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Ensuring a Successful Transition From Cytology to Human Papillomavirus-Based Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada by Investigating the Psychosocial Correlates of Women's Intentions: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Authors:  Gabrielle Griffin-Mathieu; Ben Haward; Ovidiu Tatar; Patricia Zhu; Samara Perez; Gilla K Shapiro; Emily McBride; Erika L Thompson; Laurie W Smith; Aisha K Lofters; Ellen M Daley; Juliet R Guichon; Jo Waller; Marc Steben; Kathleen M Decker; Marie-Helene Mayrand; Julia M L Brotherton; Gina S Ogilvie; Gregory D Zimet; Teresa Norris; Zeev Rosberger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities in Transgender People.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola T Oladeru; Sung Jun Ma; Joseph A Miccio; Katy Wang; Kristopher Attwood; Anurag K Singh; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Paula M Neira
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.787

4.  "Sex Can Be a Great Medicine": Sexual Health in Oncology Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Charles Kamen; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Attitudes of transgender men and non-binary people to cervical screening: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study in the UK.

Authors:  Alison M Berner; Dean J Connolly; Imogen Pinnell; Aedan Wolton; Adriana MacNaughton; Chloe Challen; Kate Nambiar; Jacob Bayliss; James Barrett; Christina Richards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.302

6.  IPVS policy statement. Equity in cervical cancer prevention: for all and not just for some.

Authors:  Julia Brotherton; Cristyn Davies
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2019-12-04

7.  Qualitative socioecological factors of cervical cancer screening use among transgender men.

Authors:  Michael Johnson; Chris Wakefield; KellyAnn Garthe
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-01-21

8.  Cancer Stage, Treatment, and Survival Among Transgender Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah S Jackson; Xuesong Han; Ziling Mao; Leticia Nogueira; Gita Suneja; Ahmedin Jemal; Meredith S Shiels
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 11.816

Review 9.  Breast Cancer Risk and Screening in Transgender Persons: A Call for Inclusive Care.

Authors:  Callisia N Clarke; Chandler S Cortina; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Lesly A Dossett; Fabian M Johnston; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Bridging Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in Transgender Men: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Navdeep Dhillon; John L Oliffe; Mary T Kelly; Jennifer Krist
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.