Michael J Johnson1, Martina Mueller2, Michele J Eliason3, Gail Stuart2, Lynne S Nemeth2. 1. School of Nursing, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 2. College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, cervical cancer screening among a sample of lesbian, bisexual and queer women, and transgender men. BACKGROUND: Past research has found that lesbian, bisexual and queer women underuse cervical screening service. Because deficient screening remains the most significant risk factor for cervical cancer, it is essential to understand the differences between routine and nonroutine screeners. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed methods design. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men were recruited in the USA from August-December 2014. Quantitative data were collected via a 48-item Internet questionnaire (N = 226), and qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews (N = 20) and open-ended questions on the Internet questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent of the sample was routine cervical screeners. The results showed that a constellation of factors influence the use of cervical cancer screening among lesbian, bisexual and queer women. Some of those factors overlap with the general female population, whereas others are specific to the lesbian, bisexual or queer identity. Routine screeners reported feeling more welcome in the health care setting, while nonroutine screeners reported more discrimination related to their sexual orientation and gender expression. Routine screeners were also more likely to 'out' to their provider. The quantitative and qualitative factors were also compared and contrasted. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the factors identified in this study to influence cervical cancer screening relate to the health care environment and to interactions between the patient and provider. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses should be involved with creating welcoming environments for lesbian, bisexual and queer women and their partners. Moreover, nurses play a large role in patient education and should promote self-care behaviours among lesbian women and transgender men.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, cervical cancer screening among a sample of lesbian, bisexual and queer women, and transgender men. BACKGROUND: Past research has found that lesbian, bisexual and queer women underuse cervical screening service. Because deficient screening remains the most significant risk factor for cervical cancer, it is essential to understand the differences between routine and nonroutine screeners. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed methods design. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men were recruited in the USA from August-December 2014. Quantitative data were collected via a 48-item Internet questionnaire (N = 226), and qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews (N = 20) and open-ended questions on the Internet questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent of the sample was routine cervical screeners. The results showed that a constellation of factors influence the use of cervical cancer screening among lesbian, bisexual and queer women. Some of those factors overlap with the general female population, whereas others are specific to the lesbian, bisexual or queer identity. Routine screeners reported feeling more welcome in the health care setting, while nonroutine screeners reported more discrimination related to their sexual orientation and gender expression. Routine screeners were also more likely to 'out' to their provider. The quantitative and qualitative factors were also compared and contrasted. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the factors identified in this study to influence cervical cancer screening relate to the health care environment and to interactions between the patient and provider. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses should be involved with creating welcoming environments for lesbian, bisexual and queer women and their partners. Moreover, nurses play a large role in patient education and should promote self-care behaviours among lesbian women and transgender men.
Authors: Tara Kiran; Sam Davie; Dhanveer Singh; Sue Hranilovic; Andrew D Pinto; Alex Abramovich; Aisha Lofters Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Salimah H Meghani; Marilyn S Sommers; Tonda L Hughes Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Ariella R Tabaac; Megan E Sutter; Sebastien Haneuse; Madina Agénor; S Bryn Austin; Carly E Guss; Brittany M Charlton Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-05-16
Authors: Alison M Berner; Dean J Connolly; Imogen Pinnell; Aedan Wolton; Adriana MacNaughton; Chloe Challen; Kate Nambiar; Jacob Bayliss; James Barrett; Christina Richards Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 6.302
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Tonda L Hughes; Marilyn S Sommers; Alexandra Hanlon; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Marvin E Langston; Lindsay Fuzzell; Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Saira Khan; Justin X Moore Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Tonda L Hughes; Alexandra Hanlon; Liming Huang; Marilyn S Sommers; Salimah H Meghani Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2018-11-12