| Literature DB >> 30674153 |
Ivana M Geremias-Andrade1, Nayla P B G Souki2, Izabel C F Moraes3, Samantha C Pinho4.
Abstract
Emulsion-filled gels are classified as soft solid materials and are complex colloids formed by matrices of polymeric gels into which emulsion droplets are incorporated. Several structural aspects of these gels have been studied in the past few years, including their applications in food, which is the focus of this review. Knowledge of the rheological behavior of emulsion-filled gels is extremely important because it can measure interferences promoted by droplets or particle inclusion on the textural properties of the gelled systems. Dynamic oscillatory tests, more specifically, small amplitude oscillatory shear, creep-recovery tests, and large deformation experiments, are discussed in this review as techniques present in the literature to characterize rheological behavior of emulsion-filled gels. Moreover, the correlation of mechanical properties with sensory aspects of emulsion-filled gels appearing in recent studies is discussed, demonstrating the applicability of these parameters in understanding mastication processes.Entities:
Keywords: emulgels; emulsion gels; emulsion-filled gels; rheological modeling; rheology of gels
Year: 2016 PMID: 30674153 PMCID: PMC6318578 DOI: 10.3390/gels2030022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1Theoretical representation of the two structures involving gels and emulsions in combination: (a) Emulsion-filled gel and (b) Emulsion gel.
Figure 2Schematic representation to differentiate the two filler particles: (a) Active particles and (b) Inactive particles.
Some interesting rheological studies on emulsion-filled gels found in the literature.
| References | Effect Studied | Principal Results |
|---|---|---|
| [ | Droplet size and emulsifier agent type on the rheology of WPI emulsion-filled gels | Gel strength of emulsion stabilized by WPI was higher than gel strength of emulsion stabilized by nonionic surfactants and gel strength of emulsion stabilized by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). For droplets stabilized by WPI, the gel strength increased as the droplet size decreased. A relatively insensitive effect on the gel strength was observed for droplets stabilized by small-molecule surfactants. |
| [ | Influence of nonionic emulsifier (Tween 20) on rheological behavior of β-lactoglobulin emulsion gels | G′ (storage modulus) demonstrated increase at low emulsifier content, decrease at intermediate emulsifier content, and then at high emulsifier contents it either increased again or remained low, depending on the protein content. |
| [ | Volume fraction of oil droplets in soybean protein gels | Increasing oil volume fraction, storage and loss moduli (G′ and G″) of the gels increased. Higher compressive stresses of the gels containing smaller oil droplets were obtained in comparison to those containing larger droplets, especially at higher volume fractions of oil droplets. |
| [ | The influence of oil and calcium concentrations on the rheological properties of cold gelation of β-lactoglobulin emulsion gels | The oil content affected G′ (storage modulus) of gels, the effect of which was higher than that of calcium concentration. |
| [ | Emulsion droplets size influence and fat content influence in preheated emulsions stabilized by whey protein produced by cold gelation | The storage modulus (G′) of the emulsion-filled gels increased with decreasing emulsion droplets size and increasing fat content. |
| [ | Different types of oils in GDL-induced SPI gels | The SPI gels filled by palm stearin emulsion were harder than the SPI gels filled by soy and sunflower oil emulsions as well as the SPI gel without oil. Gels containing the two liquid oils were softer than the control (SPI gel without oil). |
| [ | Emulsions of vegetable oils (olive and peanut) of various particle sizes in composite gels with 2% myofibrillar protein | Increases in storage modulus (G′) of myofibrillar protein sols/gels with the addition of emulsions. G′ increases with smaller emulsion droplet size. Hardness of gels containing olive oil emulsion was higher than that containing peanut oil emulsion. Myofibrillar protein as an emulsifier agent promoted stronger reinforcement of the gels than the oil droplets stabilized by Tween 80-stablized oil droplets. |
| [ | Presence of emulsified olive oil effect on G′ of gelatin-starch phase-separated gels | The dispersed oil phase behaved as an active filler within the phase-separated gel matrix due to increase of G′ after oil incorporation in the gels. |
| [ | Different oil fractions in SPI-stabilized emulsion gels | Increase in oil fraction progressively increased the storage modulus (G′) (gel strength). |
| [ | Oil and gellan gum concentrations on the viscoelastic behavior of high acyl gellan gumemulsion-filled gels | Stronger gels were obtained with increasing gellan concentration, but oil fraction had a small effect on the elastic behavior of the emulsions. |
| [ | Droplet–matrix interactions in gelatin gels filled by O/W animal fat or oil emulsions stabilized with different emulsifiers | The mechanical properties of the gels (Young’s modulus (E) and fracture properties) were affected by droplet–matrix interaction, fat content, and solid fat content. |
| [ | The volume fraction of soybean oil the rheological behavior of acid- and salt-induced soft tofu-type gels | A lower gel point temperature and a reduction in gelation time were observed for a high oil volume fraction, while an increase was observed in the storage modulus at the gel point when the oil volume fraction in the gels increased. |
Figure 3Schematic representation of the dependence of the dynamic (G′ and G″) moduli with the strain or stress and the critical value given by linear viscoelasticity limits.
Figure 4(a) Typical curve strain (γ) in function of time creep-recovery test for a viscoelastic material and (b) the four elements of Burger’s model.
Figure 5Schematic representation of behavior of an emulsion-filled gel when a shear stress is applied on active or inactive particles.