Literature DB >> 30670923

Programmed Death-ligand 1 Expression With Clone 22C3 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience.

Maiko Takeda1, Takahiko Kasai1, Maiko Naito2, Akihiro Tamiya2, Yoshihiko Taniguchi2, Nobuhiko Saijo2, Yoko Naoki2, Kyoichi Okishio3, Shigeki Shimizu4, Kensuke Kojima5, Akihiro Nagoya5, Tetsuki Sakamoto5, Tomoki Utsumi5, Hyung-Eun Yoon5, Akihide Matsumura5, Shinji Atagi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) drug pembrolizumab (Keytruda) was approved for treatment of unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as first- or second-line therapy depending on the clone 22C3-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical expression score by the companion diagnostic assay. We herein evaluated 22C3-PD-L1 expression of NSCLC in a single institution experience and compared it with clinicopathologic features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 22C3-PD-L1 expressions of 411 patients with NSCLC from our institution, including in past specimens. Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing was performed using the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Patients were separated into 3 groups with <1% (no expression), 1% to 49% (low expression), or ⩾50% (high expression) positive tumor cells.
RESULTS: In all, 137 patients (33%) did not express PD-L1, 155 (38%) showed low expression, and 119 (29%) demonstrated high expression. Archival samples showed lower PD-L1 expression than that of recent samples, and the ratios of no expression case significantly increased by using paraffin blocks embedded particularly in more than 4 years ago. Programmed death-ligand 1 positivity was significantly associated with male sex, smoking, higher tumor grade, squamous cell carcinoma in histologic type, wild-type EGFR, and ALK rearrangement positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of 22C3-PD-L1 expression of NSCLC detected in this study was similar to the frequencies of the previous reports, although the ratio of expression case decreased when using old paraffin blocks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  22C3; EGFR; Non-small lung cancer; PD-L1 expression testing; pembrolizumab

Year:  2019        PMID: 30670923      PMCID: PMC6329032          DOI: 10.1177/1179554918821314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol        ISSN: 1179-5549


Introduction

Recently, nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved for immune-checkpoint therapy in unresectable and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases.[1-3] Atezolizumab is also approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC. For pembrolizumab, a companion diagnostic assay was developed by Dako in NSCLC clinical trials to examine programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay is the companion diagnostic (CDx) assay for PD-L1 with approval in the United States and Japan. Many studies about PD-L1 IHC in NSCLC have been performed, and the association between PD-L1 expression of tumor cells and therapeutic response to the anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapy has been indicated.[1,4] It was reported in some studies that PD-L1 expression was a prognostic factor and associated with sex, smoking history, driver oncogene mutation including EGFR status, and pathologic differentiation of the tumor.[2,5-8] Nevertheless there are still few reports on 22C3-PD-L1 expression in NSCLC in Japan. We herein evaluated the 22C3-PD-L1 expression of NSCLC, including in past specimens, and compared it with clinicopathologic features.

Materials and Methods

Tumor and data collection

Patients who underwent biopsy and surgical resection for NSCLC between December 2004 and December 2017 at the National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, were consecutively selected. Clinical factors, including age, sex, and smoking history were examined from clinical records. For evaluation of the pathologic tumor stage, only surgical materials were estimated in this study. Tumor PD-L1 analysis was carried out from February 2017 to December 2017. The archived samples were newly sliced from formalin-fixed paraffin blocks and used for examination. The histopathologic diagnosis and pathologic tumor stage was confirmed by 2 pathologists (MT, TK) according to the current 2015 World Health Organization Classification.[9] We analyzed 411 patients (139 resection specimens, 272 biopsies) in this study. Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded, because previous therapies may affect the expression of PD-L1. Cytology specimens and cell block samples were not included in this study. In all, 325 patients were analyzed using the EGFR mutation test by the testing laboratories: PCR-Invader assay by BML Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). ALK status was tested by IHC with the ALK Detection Kit (Histofine ALK iAEP kit, clone 5A4, Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) and 2 different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, Vysis FISH and SureFISH.[10] Patients with ROS1 and BRAF V600E positive patients were excluded in this study, because ROS1 or BRAF V600E related lung cancer had only 1 case of each in our institution. This work was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association and was approved by our institutional review board (Approval number: 634).

Tumor PD-L1 analysis

All viable cancer cells on the entire pathologic tissue section were evaluated and included in the PD-L1 scoring analysis. Programmed death-ligand 1 IHC testing was performed using the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was calculated as the percentage of the at least 100 viable cancer cells with complete or partial membrane staining. Necrotic areas were excluded from scoring. Each patient sample was separated into 3 groups with <1% (no expression), 1% to 49% (low expression), or ⩾50% (high expression) positive tumor cells. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression positivity is defined as low and high expression on the basis of the clinical trial assay that may maximally predict the clinical response of patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab.[1]

Statistical methods

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. All P values reported are 2 sided, and tests were performed at the .05 significance level.

Results

The 411 NSCLC tumor samples were evaluated for PD-L1 expression of tumor cells (Table 1). The average age of patients examined was 70 years old. A total of 137 (33%) specimens did not express PD-L1 (no expression), 155 (38%) expressed PD-L1 in 1% to 49% of cells (low expression), and 119 (29%) expressed PD-L1 with a TPS of >50% (high expression). This prevalence is similar with KEYNOTE-001 study (Figure 1).[2] With the old specimen obtained from 2004 to 2012, 21 of 35 (60%) had no expression, 9 of 35 (26%) showed low expression, and 5 of 35 (14%) displayed high expression. With the archived samples taken from 2013 to 2015, 22 of 51 (43%) patients had no expression, 20 of 51 (39%) showed low expression, and 9 of 51 (18%) displayed high expression. In the samples from the last 2 years, 94 of 325 (29%) patients had no expression, 126 of 325 (39%) showed low expression, and 105 of 325 (32%) displayed high expression. In the archived samples, there were significantly more cases of low and no PD-L1 expression than in the recent samples (Figure 1, P = .001). The association between PD-L1 positivity and sampling method (biopsy or surgical operation) was not confirmed (data not shown).
Table 1.

PD-L1 expression status by subgroup.

SubgroupNPD-L1 expression status
P value
TPS ⩾ 50% high expression
TPS 1% to 49% low expression
TPS < 1% no expression
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Overall411119 (29)155 (38)137 (33)
Sex
 Women14127 (19)51 (36)63 (45).0004
 Men27092 (34)104 (39)74 (27)
Age
 <70 years19852 (26)72 (36)74 (37).221
 ⩾70 years21367 (31)83 (39)63 (30)
Smoking status
 Never11418 (16)46 (40)50 (44).0005
 Smoker297101 (34)109 (37)87 (29)
Histology
 ADC23855 (23)81 (34)102 (43)<.0001
 SqCC9734 (35)48 (49)15 (15)
 Other7630 (39)26 (34)20 (26)
Histologic grade
 1, 225348 (19)97 (38)108 (43)<.0001
 3, 415871 (45)58 (37)29 (18)
Pathologic stage
 I, II10323 (22)40 (39)40 (39).424
 III, IV3612 (33)12 (33)12 (33)
Genomic aberrations
EGFR mutation10516 (15)34 (32)55 (52)<.0001
ALK FISH-positive196 (32)10 (53)3 (16)
EGFR/ALK-negative20172 (36)70 (35)59 (29)

All P values calculated by using Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: ADC, adenocarcinoma; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TPS, tumor proportion score.

Figure 1.

Distribution of 22C3-PD-L1 scoring among different years in which samples were taken compared with the KEYNOTE-001 study.[1] Archival samples showed lower PD-L1 expression than that of recent samples (P = .001). The figures on the graph represent actual numbers. PD-L1 indicates programmed death-ligand 1.

PD-L1 expression status by subgroup. All P values calculated by using Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: ADC, adenocarcinoma; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TPS, tumor proportion score. Distribution of 22C3-PD-L1 scoring among different years in which samples were taken compared with the KEYNOTE-001 study.[1] Archival samples showed lower PD-L1 expression than that of recent samples (P = .001). The figures on the graph represent actual numbers. PD-L1 indicates programmed death-ligand 1. Programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression with clone 22C3 was higher in men than in women and in smokers than in non-smokers. In addition, PD-L1 expression was more common in squamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma. High-expression was more frequent in higher histologic grades. The PD-L1 expression group had a significantly higher proportion of EGFR mutation-negative carcinoma and ALK-rearranged lung carcinoma. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was not significantly associated with patient age or pathologic stage.

Discussion

The rapid progress of immunotherapy for lung cancer may bring a revolution for cancer therapy. Recently, the anti-PD-L1 drug pembrolizumab (Keytruda) was approved for treatment of locally advanced and metastasizing NSCLC as first- or second-line therapy depending on the PD-L1 expression score. The best predictive factor for effect of immunotherapy is tumor PD-L1 expression analyzed by IHC on the pathologic tissue sections. The companion diagnostic assay for this drug, the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako Agilent, Denmark), is based on the primary monoclonal antibody 22C3 and is carried out on the semiautomatic Dako Autostainer Link 48 platform. Association between clinicopathologic features and PD-L1 expression in NSCLC reported in some studies remains controversial.[2,5-8] There are still only a few reports about 22C3-PD-L1 expression in NSCLC in Japan. Yoneshima et al[11] reported that a subset of patients with EGFR mutations or ALK arrangement showed 22C3-PD-L1 high expression. Kato et al[12] reported that nodal metastasis, sample preservation time and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were associated with 22C3-PD-L1 expression. We retrospectively evaluated PD-L1 expression and analyzed its correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics. In this study, there was no association between PD-L1 expression and age or pathologic stage, although more men and smokers were found in the PD-L1 expression group than women and non-smokers. There are several reports about the association between smoking and PD-L1 expression. Calles et al[7] suggested that the expression of PD-L1 was induced by smoking with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Deng et al[13] reported that current/former smokers showed significantly higher expression of PD-L1 compared with never smokers. These results are consistent with ours. On the contrary, the association between smoking and PD-L1 expression was not noted in some reports.[14] According to previous studies, PD-L1 expression in NSCLC was significantly more common in squamous cell carcinoma than in non-squamous NSCLC of the lung, as in our study.[15,16] The correlation between classic driver oncogene mutations in EGFR or ALK and PD-L1 expression in lung carcinoma has been studied, and the results obtained thus far are controversial. EGFR mutation status was reported to not be associated with PD-L1 expression in some reports.[2] Other reports suggested that the presence of EGFR gene mutation and ALK rearrangement are associated with the lack of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.[17] Takada et al[18] recently found that PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with wild-type EGFR. In our study, wild-type EGFR or ALK-rearranged carcinoma was associated with PD-L1 expression. Although we did not examine the association between PD-L1 expression and prognosis, there are many studies using numerous modalities indicating high PD-L1 expression to be a poor prognostic factor in NSCLC.[2,19,20] The proportion of positive PD-L1 expression was less in the specimens newly sliced from older paraffin blocks in this study. Grillo et al[21] reported that membrane and nuclear antigens presented reduced IHC staining intensity in older blocks. The cause of degradation of antigen preservation is uncertain, but archival conditions and oxidation processes may be involved. The report showing similar results to ours about PD-L1 expression in archival specimens was published recently.[12] Furthermore, Herbst et al[22] reported that TPS for PD-L1 was superior in fresh samples compared with archival samples, although patient survival was not related to the time of sample collection. Therefore, cautious judgment is necessary when using older paraffin blocks. But this study has some limitations that should be examined in future. Sample type (biopsy vs resection), site (primary vs metastasis), tumor stage, and any other clinicopathologic feature has been reported to be significantly associated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.[23-25] Any association with other clinicopathologic features should be excluded, in considering the effect of archived samples. Although the fact that PD-L1 expression remains an independent predictive marker of response to therapy has been emphasized, it may be controversial. Most recently, combination chemotherapy plus immunotherapy has been reported to be the new standard of care in metastatic treatment naive NSCLC now based on KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407.[26,27] In addition, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) has been reported to be another predictive marker in the CHECKMATE-227 study, and so the studies on a larger series of patients with NSCLC about correlation of PD-L1 expression with TMB and chemotherapy will be examined in the future.[28] In conclusion, the rate of 22C3-PD-L1 expression of NSCLC (Figure 2) detected in this study was similar to the frequencies of the previous reports, although the ratio of expression case decreased when using old paraffin blocks. The rate of 22C3-PD-L1 positivity in IHC was significantly associated with male sex, smoking, higher tumor grade, squamous cell carcinoma in histologic type, wild-type EGFR, and ALK rearrangement positive.
Figure 2.

Representative images of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 in NSCLC. (A) Papillary adenocarcinoma demonstrating no expression (TPS = 0%), but was associated with macrophages exhibiting membranous staining. (B) Acinar adenocarcinoma exhibiting low expression (TPS = 35%). (C) Squamous cell carcinoma demonstrating high expression (TPS = 100%). IHC indicates immunohistochemistry; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; TPS, tumor proportion score.

Representative images of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 in NSCLC. (A) Papillary adenocarcinoma demonstrating no expression (TPS = 0%), but was associated with macrophages exhibiting membranous staining. (B) Acinar adenocarcinoma exhibiting low expression (TPS = 35%). (C) Squamous cell carcinoma demonstrating high expression (TPS = 100%). IHC indicates immunohistochemistry; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; TPS, tumor proportion score.
  26 in total

1.  Expression of PD-1 and Its Ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in Smokers and Never Smokers with KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Calles; Xiaoyun Liao; Lynette M Sholl; Scott J Rodig; Gordon J Freeman; Mohit Butaney; Christine Lydon; Suzanne E Dahlberg; F Stephen Hodi; Geoffrey R Oxnard; David M Jackman; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of NSCLC patients reveal major discordances: a potential issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  M Ilie; E Long-Mira; C Bence; C Butori; S Lassalle; L Bouhlel; L Fazzalari; K Zahaf; S Lalvée; K Washetine; J Mouroux; N Vénissac; M Poudenx; J Otto; J C Sabourin; C H Marquette; V Hofman; P Hofman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen-Kui Pan; Feng Ye; Xuan Wu; Han-Xiang An; Jing-Xun Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Paul Baas; Dong-Wan Kim; Enriqueta Felip; José L Pérez-Gracia; Ji-Youn Han; Julian Molina; Joo-Hang Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Myung-Ju Ahn; Margarita Majem; Mary J Fidler; Gilberto de Castro; Marcelo Garrido; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Ellie Im; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Association of PDCD1 and CTLA-4 Gene Expression with Clinicopathological Factors and Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Large and Pooled Microarray Database.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Balazs Gyorffy; Feifei Na; Baoqing Chen; Jie Lan; Jianxin Xue; Lin Zhou; You Lu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Julien Mazières; David Planchard; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Grace K Dy; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Hervé Lena; Elisa Minenza; Bertrand Mennecier; Gregory A Otterson; Luis T Campos; David R Gandara; Benjamin P Levy; Suresh G Nair; Gérard Zalcman; Jürgen Wolf; Pierre-Jean Souquet; Editta Baldini; Federico Cappuzzo; Christos Chouaid; Afshin Dowlati; Rachel Sanborn; Ariel Lopez-Chavez; Christian Grohe; Rudolf M Huber; Christopher T Harbison; Christine Baudelet; Brian J Lestini; Suresh S Ramalingam
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Association of PD-L1 overexpression with activating EGFR mutations in surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  K Azuma; K Ota; A Kawahara; S Hattori; E Iwama; T Harada; K Matsumoto; K Takayama; S Takamori; M Kage; T Hoshino; Y Nakanishi; I Okamoto
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in molecularly selected non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  A D'Incecco; M Andreozzi; V Ludovini; E Rossi; A Capodanno; L Landi; C Tibaldi; G Minuti; J Salvini; E Coppi; A Chella; G Fontanini; M E Filice; L Tornillo; R M Incensati; S Sani; L Crinò; L Terracciano; F Cappuzzo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcome of combined chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kenji Morimoto; Junji Uchino; Takashi Yokoi; Takashi Kijima; Yasuhiro Goto; Akira Nakao; Makoto Hibino; Takayuki Takeda; Hiroyuki Yamaguchi; Chieko Takumi; Masafumi Takeshita; Yusuke Chihara; Takahiro Yamada; Osamu Hiranuma; Yoshie Morimoto; Masahiro Iwasaku; Yoshiko Kaneko; Tadaaki Yamada; Koichi Takayama
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 8.110

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.