OBJECTIVES: It was reported that programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with smoking and wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung adenocarcinoma. However, the association between PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation site in EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the relationship between PD-L1 expression and EGFR status in 441 surgically resected primary lung adenocarcinomas. Membrane PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis using a PD-L1 antibody (clone SP142) and defined by tumor proportion scores (TPSs) of 0%, 1-4%, 5-49%, and ≥50%, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen (49.4%) patients had wild-type EGFR, and 223 (50.6%) had mutant EGFR-98 (44.0%) with exon 19 deletion, 116 (52.0%) with exon 21 L858R point mutation, and nine (4.0%) with another EGFR mutation. Overall, Fisher's exact test showed that PD-L1 positivity was associated with wild-type EGFR, and there was only one case with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% among the cases with mutant EGFR. The analysis of cases with mutant EGFR indicated no significant association between EGFR mutation site and PD-L1 expression. However, the prevalence of PD-L1 TPS 5-49% was higher among patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion than with EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with wild-type EGFR, and PD-L1 TPS ≥50% seldom overlaps with presence of driver oncogene EGFR. There was no significant difference in PD-L1 expression among the EGFR mutation sites.
OBJECTIVES: It was reported that programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with smoking and wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung adenocarcinoma. However, the association between PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation site in EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the relationship between PD-L1 expression and EGFR status in 441 surgically resected primary lung adenocarcinomas. Membrane PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis using a PD-L1 antibody (clone SP142) and defined by tumor proportion scores (TPSs) of 0%, 1-4%, 5-49%, and ≥50%, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen (49.4%) patients had wild-type EGFR, and 223 (50.6%) had mutant EGFR-98 (44.0%) with exon 19 deletion, 116 (52.0%) with exon 21 L858R point mutation, and nine (4.0%) with another EGFR mutation. Overall, Fisher's exact test showed that PD-L1 positivity was associated with wild-type EGFR, and there was only one case with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% among the cases with mutant EGFR. The analysis of cases with mutant EGFR indicated no significant association between EGFR mutation site and PD-L1 expression. However, the prevalence of PD-L1 TPS 5-49% was higher among patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion than with EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation. CONCLUSIONS:PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with wild-type EGFR, and PD-L1 TPS ≥50% seldom overlaps with presence of driver oncogene EGFR. There was no significant difference in PD-L1 expression among the EGFR mutation sites.