Literature DB >> 30670615

Determination of the Global Pattern of Gene Expression in Yeast Cells by Intracellular Levels of Guanine Nucleotides.

Andy Hesketh1,2,3, Marta Vergnano4,2, Stephen G Oliver1,2.   

Abstract

Correlations between gene transcription and the abundance of high-energy purine nucleotides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have often been noted. However, there has been no systematic investigation of this phenomenon in the absence of confounding factors such as nutrient status and growth rate, and there is little hard evidence for a causal relationship. Whether transcription is fundamentally responsive to prevailing cellular energetic conditions via sensing of intracellular purine nucleotides, independently of specific nutrition, remains an important question. The controlled nutritional environment of chemostat culture revealed a strong correlation between ATP and GTP abundance and the transcription of genes required for growth. Short pathways for the inducible and futile consumption of ATP or GTP were engineered into S. cerevisiae, permitting analysis of the transcriptional effect of an increased demand for these nucleotides. During steady-state growth using the fermentable carbon source glucose, the futile consumption of ATP led to a decrease in intracellular ATP concentration but an increase in GTP and the guanylate energy charge (GEC). Expression of transcripts encoding proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis, and those controlled by promoters subject to SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodelling, was correlated with these nucleotide pool changes. Similar nucleotide abundance changes were observed using a nonfermentable carbon source, but an effect on the growth-associated transcriptional programme was absent. Induction of the GTP-cycling pathway had only marginal effects on nucleotide abundance and gene transcription. The transcriptional response of respiring cells to glucose was dampened in chemostats induced for ATP cycling, but not GTP cycling, and this was primarily associated with altered adenine nucleotide levels.IMPORTANCE This paper investigates whether, independently of the supply of any specific nutrient, gene transcription responds to the energy status of the cell by monitoring ATP and GTP levels. Short pathways for the inducible and futile consumption of ATP or GTP were engineered into the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the effect of an increased demand for these purine nucleotides on gene transcription was analyzed. The resulting changes in transcription were most consistently associated with changes in GTP and GEC levels, although the reprogramming in gene expression during glucose repression is sensitive to adenine nucleotide levels. The results show that GTP levels play a central role in determining how genes act to respond to changes in energy supply and that any comprehensive understanding of the control of eukaryotic gene expression requires the elucidation of how changes in guanine nucleotide abundance are sensed and transduced to alter the global pattern of transcription.
Copyright © 2019 Hesketh et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP; GTP; Saccharomyces cerevisiaezzm321990; metabolism; purine metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30670615      PMCID: PMC6343037          DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02500-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mBio            Impact factor:   7.867


INTRODUCTION

In order for Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to survive, grow, and proliferate, their metabolism must respond, in both the short term and the long term, to changes in their environment. This is achieved via control exerted at multiple levels, including the regulation of gene transcription and the modulation of gene product activities by both posttranslational modifications and the allosteric binding of metabolites to enzymes and other effectors (1–5). These differing routes of control allow metabolic responses to take place on different time scales: the allosteric and posttranslational mechanisms can produce almost instantaneous effects, while the reprogramming of gene expression produces adjustments over the longer term. The intracellular abundance of small-molecule metabolites plays a key role in these responses not only at the level of enzyme activity but also at the level of the regulation of gene expression. Thus, metabolites can exert their effects via the modulation of TORC1 kinase activity by amino acid availability (6) and through the influence of intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) and acetyl-CoA concentrations on the activity of the PKA kinase complex (7, 8) and on histone acetylation (9). It has also been proposed that SNF1 kinase activity is regulated by ADP nucleotide levels (10). Since gene expression also determines metabolite abundance by providing anabolic enzymes, the state of cellular metabolism at any time can be viewed as the product of the interplay between metabolite concentrations and the abundance and activity of gene products. ATP and GTP, together with the other related nucleotide di- and monophosphates, are among the most highly connected metabolites in the yeast metabolic network (http://yeast.sourceforge.net/), and their intracellular concentrations are a key measure of general metabolic status. The concept of a cellular adenylate energy charge (AEC), defined by the relative concentrations of all three phosphorylated adenosine nucleotides [ATP] + 0.5[ADP]/[ATP] + [ADP] + [AMP], was first proposed in 1967 to describe the energy status of living cells (11), and the homeostatic control of AEC has since become a common paradigm in cell physiology. The analogous cellular guanylate energy charge (GEC) is also considered relevant, based on the requirement for GTP as the immediate source of energy for peptide bond formation in cellular protein synthesis (12). Many studies of S. cerevisiae have reported correlations between changes in phosphorylated adenosine and guanosine nucleotide concentrations and changes in cell physiology or gene expression. Batch-grown cultures using glucose as the carbon source exhibit marked decreases in the ratios of both [ATP]/[ADP] and [GTP]/[GDP] on transition from exponential growth to the stationary phase (13). Conversely, the addition of glucose to respiring or glucose-starved cells produced marked increases in these ratios (13, 14). In silico studies have also predicted a role for [GTP]/[GDP] in modulating the activity of the PKA complex by influencing the activity state of the Ras2p GTP-binding protein responsible for controlling production of the upstream cAMP signal (15–17). Perhaps the most convincing in vivo data has been collected from yeast cultures as they transit through cycles of respiratory oscillations where expression of a majority of genes in the genome becomes highly synchronized (18, 19). These oscillations, characterized by alternating periods of high and low oxygen consumption (oxidative and reductive phases, respectively), are associated with corresponding oscillations in [ATP]/[ADP] ratios and with a periodic large-scale rewiring of gene expression such that energy-intensive processes (such as ribosome biogenesis) are implemented during the periods of high respiratory activity/energy production (18–22). Extensive nucleosome repositioning occurs as the yeast cells transit through a cycle, and modulation of the activity of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes has been proposed to contribute to the transcriptional reprogramming by making core promoter elements of target genes more accessible for use (20–22). Acetyl-CoA could be a key metabolic signal through its indirect effect on the acetylation status of histones and other proteins involved in chromatin remodelling (9, 23). Conversely, a direct role for ATP has also been proposed, since many chromatin remodelling complexes are dependent on this nucleotide for their activity (20). All these observations provide circumstantial evidence for the yeast cell transcriptional program being, in some way, generally responsive to changing nucleotide levels. They suggest a cycle of regulation between metabolic activity, nucleotide concentrations, and gene expression. Evidence for a causal relationship is, however, sparse since confounding variables such as growth rate (24) or nutritional status (25) cannot be adequately controlled when experiments are performed in batch culture. In order to circumvent these difficulties, we have developed strains of S. cerevisiae in which an increased use of ATP or GTP can be induced in cells independently of the external nutrient supply or changes in the rate of growth. This has been achieved by engineering yeast to express enzymes from bacteria that enable the futile consumption of either ATP or GTP. Analysis of the transcriptional response following induction of these ectopic pathways during continuous culture in chemostats demonstrates that inducing the futile consumption of ATP, but not GTP, results in a major reprogramming of gene transcription in yeast cells grown on a fermentative carbon source (glucose) but not on those cells growing by respiration on acetate. This genetic reprogramming does not require changes to the AEC but, instead, is associated with an increase in GTP and the GEC. Induction of the futile consumption of ATP, but not GTP, also has an effect on the transcriptional response of respiring cells to glucose repression.

RESULTS

Exploiting bacterial enzymes to engineer the futile consumption of ATP or GTP in S. cerevisiae.

To generate strains of S. cerevisiae where a direct and specific increase in the consumption of ATP or GTP can be controllably induced, we heterologously expressed genes encoding bacterial enzymes that use these nucleotides as substrates (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The doxycycline (DOX)-inducible expression of a cyclic dinucleotide monophosphate (cdiNMP) synthetase enzyme was coupled with the constitutive expression of its corresponding hydrolase to create short pathways for the futile degradation of two molecules of ATP or GTP to two molecules of AMP or GMP via their respective cdiNMP intermediates (Fig. 1a). Expression constructs were based on a centromeric plasmid carrying two nutritional marker genes, URA3 and LEU2, to enable selection for the continuous presence of the plasmid during prolonged culture (Fig. 1b). A repressor construct to minimize transcription from the DOX-inducible promoter in the absence of inducer (26) was also integrated into the genome of the host strain BY4741. This combination of nutritional markers on the plasmid generated prototrophic strains (Table 1) capable of growing on a minimal medium containing only a suitable carbon source, ammonium sulfate, potassium phosphate, and trace essential vitamins and minerals (27). This eliminates confounding effects on the yeast transcriptional program arising from the metabolic consequences of auxotrophy (28).
FIG 1

Engineering inducible consumption of ATP or GTP in S. cerevisiae using coding sequences from bacteria. Shunt pathway loops for the futile turnover of each nucleotide triphosphate to their corresponding monophosphates via cyclic dinucleotide monophosphate (cdiNMP) intermediates (a) were introduced into S. cerevisiae BY4741-112 on a series of related centromeric plasmids (b). A targeted HPLC-UV metabolomics analysis (c and d) of the constructed strains following induction of expression of the plasmid genes encoding the cdiNMP synthetase enzymes using doxycycline (DOX) (5 μg/ml) shows high-level production of cdiGMP (c) (strain 137) and cdiAMP (d) (strain 136) compared to the control strain carrying the empty vector (c and d) (strain 134). Constitutive coexpression of appropriate cdiNMP hydrolase genes completes the pathway loop and removes the accumulation of cdiGMP (c) (strain 141) and cdiAMP (d) (strain 151) during similar inductions. None of the bacterial metabolites was detected in strains constitutively expressing the cdiNMP hydrolase genes alone (strain 138 [c] and strain 148 [d]). In both panels c and d, the panels to the left are overlays of HPLC-UV chromatograms (arbitrary absorbance units [Au] with detection at 254 nm) from a representative analysis of metabolite extracts from cultures of the strains indicated. Analysis of a mixed standard (STD) containing 2,000 pmol of either cdiGMP and pGpG (c) or cdiAMP and pApA (d) indicates the retention times of these metabolites. The panels to the right show normalized nucleotide abundances (picomoles/optical density) calculated from the HPLC-UV data as an average of duplicate experiments. Values are means ± standard deviations (error bars).

TABLE 1

Plasmids and yeast strains used in this study

Plasmid or strainDescription or relevant genotypeReference
Plasmids
    pAH112pRS-HIS3-MET15 TetR::SSN636
    pAH134pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr36
    pAH136pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr::ybbP36
    pAH137pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr::dgcA36
    pAH138pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr:: TDH3pr::SFV3559This work
    pAH141pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr::dgcA TDH3pr::SFV3559This work
    pAH148pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr:: TDH3pr::yybTThis work
    pAH151pRS-LEU2-URA3 VP16::TetR' TetO7pr::ybbP TDH3pr::yybTThis work
Strains
    BY4741MATa ura3Δ0 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 his3Δ1
    BY4741-112BY4741 with integrated plasmid pAH112 (his3Δ1::pAH112 ura3Δ0 leu2Δ0)36
    BY4741-112-134BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH134 (prototroph)36
    BY4741-112-136BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH136 (prototroph)36
    BY4741-112-137BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH137 (prototroph)36
    BY4741-112-138BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH138 (prototroph)This work
    BY4741-112-141BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH141 (prototroph)This work
    BY4741-112-148BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH148 (prototroph)This work
    BY4741-112-151BY4741-112 with centromeric plasmid pAH151 (prototroph)This work
Engineering inducible consumption of ATP or GTP in S. cerevisiae using coding sequences from bacteria. Shunt pathway loops for the futile turnover of each nucleotide triphosphate to their corresponding monophosphates via cyclic dinucleotide monophosphate (cdiNMP) intermediates (a) were introduced into S. cerevisiae BY4741-112 on a series of related centromeric plasmids (b). A targeted HPLC-UV metabolomics analysis (c and d) of the constructed strains following induction of expression of the plasmid genes encoding the cdiNMP synthetase enzymes using doxycycline (DOX) (5 μg/ml) shows high-level production of cdiGMP (c) (strain 137) and cdiAMP (d) (strain 136) compared to the control strain carrying the empty vector (c and d) (strain 134). Constitutive coexpression of appropriate cdiNMP hydrolase genes completes the pathway loop and removes the accumulation of cdiGMP (c) (strain 141) and cdiAMP (d) (strain 151) during similar inductions. None of the bacterial metabolites was detected in strains constitutively expressing the cdiNMP hydrolase genes alone (strain 138 [c] and strain 148 [d]). In both panels c and d, the panels to the left are overlays of HPLC-UV chromatograms (arbitrary absorbance units [Au] with detection at 254 nm) from a representative analysis of metabolite extracts from cultures of the strains indicated. Analysis of a mixed standard (STD) containing 2,000 pmol of either cdiGMP and pGpG (c) or cdiAMP and pApA (d) indicates the retention times of these metabolites. The panels to the right show normalized nucleotide abundances (picomoles/optical density) calculated from the HPLC-UV data as an average of duplicate experiments. Values are means ± standard deviations (error bars). Plasmids and yeast strains used in this study The functionality of the engineered pathways was assessed by analysis of the intracellular nucleotide composition in the host strains following induction with DOX during growth in batch culture (Fig. 1c and d). Strain BY4741-112-137 carrying only the inducible cdiGMP synthetase gene variant dgcA0244 from the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus (29) showed intracellular production of cdiGMP to levels approximately 10 times the concentration observed for GTP and twice that for ATP, the latter being the most abundant natural intracellular nucleotide in yeast cells (Fig. 1c). Similar DOX-induced expression of the cdiAMP synthetase gene ybbP from Bacillus subtilis (30) yielded ca. six times more intracellular cdiAMP than ATP (Fig. 1d; strain BY4741-112-136). In each case, incorporation of genes determining cdiNMP hydrolase activity in the strains prevented accumulation of the heterologous cdiNMP metabolites, indicating a successful conversion of the nucleotide triphosphate to monophosphate via the cdiNMP intermediate. Thus, coexpression of the cdiGMP hydrolase gene SVF3559 from Shigella flexneri (31) in strain BY4741-112-141 reduced cdiGMP production by 98.5% (Fig. 1c). Only low levels of the linear dinucleotide pGpG were observed, consistent with the conversion of the majority of the cdiGMP generated by the synthetase DgcA to GMP. Coexpression of a portion of the Bacillus subtilis cdiAMP hydrolase gene yybT (32) with the DOX-inducible yybP gene in strain BY4741-112-151 reduced cdiAMP production by 82.5% compared to expression of ybbP alone (Fig. 1d).

Using carbon-limited chemostat cultures to analyze the effect of inducing increases in ATP or GTP consumption during steady-state growth.

Aerobic cultures of S. cerevisiae have the potential to generate energy from externally supplied carbon sources by either fermentative or respiratory pathways. In order to analyze the effect of inducing increases in ATP or GTP consumption in cells using these different routes for energy production, strains were grown in chemostats at dilution rates of 0.11 to 0.12 h−1 under carbon-limited conditions using a defined minimal medium containing either 0.5% (wt/vol) acetate (respiratory) or 0.25% (wt/vol) glucose (respiratory) as the energy source. Cultures were sampled to analyze any changes in the intracellular nucleotide pool composition and genome-wide transcript abundance, as illustrated in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material and described in detail in Materials and Methods. Chemostat cultivation, characterized by growth at a fixed rate in constant nutritional conditions, was used to control for confounding effects of any changes in growth rate or external nutrient supply during induction. Each culture was sampled during steady-state growth in the noninducing conditions (designated SS1) and 3 h, 6 h, and 9 h after inducing the heterologous pathway by adding DOX (designated T1, T2, and T3, respectively), and during steady-state growth in the induced cultures (designated SS2). To investigate any effect on the transition from respiratory to fermentative growth, the chemostats respiring acetate were additionally treated with a pulse of glucose (final concentration, 1.6% [wt/vol]) after collecting the SS2 sample, and further samples were taken 15 min (G1), 30 min (G2) and 60 min (G3) after treatment. Transcription of the transgenes in the chemostat experiments proceeded as designed, and production of the cyclic and linear dinucleotide intermediates was within the range expected from the batch culture data in Fig. 1 (Fig. S1). The genes encoding the hydrolase enzymes ranked in the top 2% most highly expressed genes, and the induced expression of the synthetase constructs was in the top 1%. Normalized transcriptome and nucleotide abundance data are provided in Data Set S1, and nucleotide abundance plots are provided in Data Set S2. Induction of the futile ATP-cycling or GTP-cycling pathways during steady-state growth in carbon-limited chemostat cultures using sodium acetate (a) or glucose (b) as the energy source. Triplicate chemostats containing control strains (light gray curves) or NTP-cycling strains (dark gray curves) were grown to an initial steady state (SS1) prior to induction by the addition of 5 mg/ml DOX. Samples (indicated by the dotted lines) for transcriptome and targeted metabolome analyses were taken 3 h (T1), 6 h (T2), and 9 h (T3) after induction and when a new postinduction steady state had been reached (SS2). In the acetate growth experiment, chemostats were also treated with a pulse of glucose (final concentration, 1.6% [wt/v]) after collecting the SS2 sample, and further samples were taken 15 min (G1), 30 min (G2), and 60 min (G3) after treatment. For clarity, only the G3 sample is indicated above. The effect on biomass in the chemostats was followed by off-line measurements of the culture absorbance at 600 nm (OD600nm). Shading indicates the 95% confidence interval for loess-fitting smoothed curves to the data points. Strains used for the GTP- and ATP-cycling experiments were as follows: for GTP-cycling experiments, the control strain was BY4741-112-138 and the NTP-cycling strain was BY4741-112-141; for the ATP-cycling experiments, the control strain was BY4741-112-148 and the NTP-cycling strain was BY4741-112-151. (c) Transcript abundance profiles for the nucleotide-cycling pathway genes during the chemostat runs illustrated are presented in panels a and b. As expected, SVF3559 is constitutively highly expressed in strains BY4741-112-138 (138) and BY4741-112-141 (141), while transcription of dgcA is induced only after DOX addition to the BY4741-112-141 chemostat. Similarly, for the ATP-cycling chemostats, yybT is constitutively expressed in both strains BY4741-112-148 (148) and BY4741-112-151 (151), and the ybbP gene encoding the cdiAMP synthetase is induced only in strain BY4741-112-151. Download FIG S1, EPS file, 3.5 MB. Normalized transcript abundance and intracellular nucleotide abundance data for the triplicate chemostat experiments. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 16.7 MB. Plots of the changes in the abundances of intracellular nucleotides detected during the chemostat experiments. Download Data Set S2, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

Nucleotide indicators of high cellular energy status correlate with transcription of genes required for ribosome biogenesis.

To define the basal relationship between nucleotide and transcript abundances in the experimental system, covariance in the sets of data obtained for the control chemostat strains BY4741-112-138 and BY4741-112-148 was analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA) (Fig. 2) and by sparse partial least-squares (sPLS) canonical analysis using the mixOmics R package (33) (Fig. 3 and Data Set S3). PCA of the nucleotide abundance data (Fig. 2a) indicates that the cultures growing in acetate are distinguished from those grown in glucose by higher levels of ATP, GTP, IMP, cAMP, AMP, GMP, CMP, GDP, ADP, UMP, and CTP (nucleotides shown in zone 1 of Fig. 2a), but they exhibit similar values for AEC and GEC. The addition of glucose to the acetate-grown cultures changes the levels of zone 1 nucleotides to levels more similar to those observed in the glucose-grown chemostats, with the notable exception of IMP, GTP, and ATP which, in contrast, are increased further (Fig. 2 and Data Set S2). Both AEC and GEC were markedly higher in these samples compared to either the steady-state acetate- or glucose-limited chemostat samples.
FIG 2

Changes in intracellular nucleotide concentrations during the control chemostat cultures using strains BY4741-112-138 (138) and BY4741-112-148 (148) and either acetate or glucose as the carbon source. (a) PCA analysis summarizing the differences in nucleotide content of cells grown in the different chemostat conditions. The scores plot (top left panel) shows distinct grouping of the acetate (a), glucose (g), and glucose-treated acetate (a-g) chemostat samples, while the loadings plot (bottom left panel) highlights the underlying differences in nucleotide abundances. Nucleotide abundances distinguishing group a from group g are in the shaded zone 1, and those separating group a-g from group a or g are in zone 2. (b) Abundance profiles for example nucleotides from these shaded zones are provided to the right (see Data Set S2 in the supplemental material for all profiles).

FIG 3

Correlations between gene transcription and intracellular nucleotide abundance in the control chemostat cultures using strains BY4741-112-138 (138) and BY4741-112-148 (148). (a) Clustered image map from sPLS analysis of nucleotide (x-axis) and transcript (y-axis) abundance data showing the most highly correlated nucleotide and transcript pairings, clustering 1,609 transcripts into six cluster groups (ct) (sPLS threshold of 0.8). (b) Abundance profiles for the transcripts in groups 1 to 6 in samples SS1-SS2 (glucose chemostats) and SS1-G3 (acetate chemostats). (c) Functional classification of genes in cluster groups (ct) 1 to 6 using GO enrichment analysis (only headline significant GO terms are shown); comparison with the consensus respiratory oscillation cluster group membership from Machne and Murray (22) (A, A.B, and B = anabolic, oxidative; D = catabolic, reductive; see reference 22 for other group definitions); analysis of transcription initiation promoter category as reported in Rhee and Pugh (34) (TATA−, TATA-less; TATA+, TATA-containing; TFIID, TAF1-enriched; SAGA, TAF1-depleted; NA, not assigned); transcription factor (TF) regulation predictions (yeastract database [35]); and comparison to the promoter nucleosome dynamics category assigned in Nocetti et al. (21) (for nucleosomes, static = dyad range 0 in reference 21; Remod.= dyad range ≥5 in reference 21). The numbers in brackets are significance P values from Fisher’s exact tests for category enrichment. Complete GO and yeastract analysis results are provided in Data Set S3.

Changes in intracellular nucleotide concentrations during the control chemostat cultures using strains BY4741-112-138 (138) and BY4741-112-148 (148) and either acetate or glucose as the carbon source. (a) PCA analysis summarizing the differences in nucleotide content of cells grown in the different chemostat conditions. The scores plot (top left panel) shows distinct grouping of the acetate (a), glucose (g), and glucose-treated acetate (a-g) chemostat samples, while the loadings plot (bottom left panel) highlights the underlying differences in nucleotide abundances. Nucleotide abundances distinguishing group a from group g are in the shaded zone 1, and those separating group a-g from group a or g are in zone 2. (b) Abundance profiles for example nucleotides from these shaded zones are provided to the right (see Data Set S2 in the supplemental material for all profiles). Correlations between gene transcription and intracellular nucleotide abundance in the control chemostat cultures using strains BY4741-112-138 (138) and BY4741-112-148 (148). (a) Clustered image map from sPLS analysis of nucleotide (x-axis) and transcript (y-axis) abundance data showing the most highly correlated nucleotide and transcript pairings, clustering 1,609 transcripts into six cluster groups (ct) (sPLS threshold of 0.8). (b) Abundance profiles for the transcripts in groups 1 to 6 in samples SS1-SS2 (glucose chemostats) and SS1-G3 (acetate chemostats). (c) Functional classification of genes in cluster groups (ct) 1 to 6 using GO enrichment analysis (only headline significant GO terms are shown); comparison with the consensus respiratory oscillation cluster group membership from Machne and Murray (22) (A, A.B, and B = anabolic, oxidative; D = catabolic, reductive; see reference 22 for other group definitions); analysis of transcription initiation promoter category as reported in Rhee and Pugh (34) (TATA−, TATA-less; TATA+, TATA-containing; TFIID, TAF1-enriched; SAGA, TAF1-depleted; NA, not assigned); transcription factor (TF) regulation predictions (yeastract database [35]); and comparison to the promoter nucleosome dynamics category assigned in Nocetti et al. (21) (for nucleosomes, static = dyad range 0 in reference 21; Remod.= dyad range ≥5 in reference 21). The numbers in brackets are significance P values from Fisher’s exact tests for category enrichment. Complete GO and yeastract analysis results are provided in Data Set S3. sPLS canonical analysis looking for correlations between the transcript abundance and nucleotide abundance data matrices, as also illustrated in Fig. 3. Download Data Set S3, XLSX file, 4.8 MB. Interestingly, all the indicators of high cellular energy status (i.e., AEC, GEC, ATP, GTP, and IMP [IMP being a key intermediate in de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis]) show a strong positive correlation with a cluster of transcripts encoding proteins significantly enriched in functions associated with the biogenesis of the translational machinery and with those proteins involved in purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis (cluster 3 in Fig. 3). This cluster shows significant similarity to the cell growth and anabolic supercluster genes (A, A.B, and B) previously identified as being expressed in the oxidative phase of a respiratory oscillation cycle (22) (Fig. 3c). Conversely, a general negative correlation was observed between the high-energy nucleotides and transcription associated with the generation of precursor metabolites and energy, glycogen metabolism, and the mitochondrion (cluster 4 in Fig. 3), and this cluster exhibits a significant similarity to the reductive phase supercluster (D) of a respiratory oscillation (22). The abundances of CDP, UDP, UDPG, and UTP exhibit a strong positive correlation with transcript cluster 4, which is characterized by similar expression levels between the acetate and glucose steady-state growth conditions, but marked repression on the addition of glucose to the cultures growing on acetate as the principal carbon source (Fig. 3a). Transcript clusters 1 and 2 also exhibit repression following this glucose treatment, but they tend to be more highly expressed during steady-state growth on acetate than on glucose and correlate most highly with cAMP and the lower-energy nucleotide monophosphates plus ADP, GDP, and CTP. These clusters are enriched for functions associated with the TCA cycle, oxidation-reduction, and the mitochondrion (Fig. 3). Thus, this analysis suggests a distinction between the repression of reserve energy metabolism correlated with the higher-energy uridine nucleotides on the one hand (cluster 4), and the downregulation of mitochondrial respiration correlated with low-energy nucleotides on the other hand (clusters 1 and 2).

Gene transcription positively correlating with the abundance of high-energy nucleotides tends to occur from promoters found in remodellable chromatin locations.

Nocetti et al. (21) observed that the dynamic range in the transcription of genes during a respiratory oscillation cycle is closely related to the extent of repositioning of +1 nucleosomes taking place at their promoters, and also to the use of the transcriptional coactivators SAGA or TFIID. Thus, in their experimental system, acute nucleosome remodelling occurred preferentially at SAGA promoters and facilitated dynamic changes in the expression of genes required for growth. Snf2p, the ATP-dependent catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex, was identified as playing a fundamental role in both the nucleosome repositioning and growth-associated gene expression. To determine whether the changes in gene expression identified in the chemostat growth conditions used in this study are associated with any particular type of promoter, we tested the transcription clusters identified above (Fig. 3a and b) for significant overrepresentation of control by the remodellable promoters as defined by Nocetti et al. (21) and for previously published associations with TFIID or SAGA (34) (Fig. 3c). Transcript cluster 3, which positively correlates with the high-energy nucleotide markers (ATP, GTP, GEC, AEC, and IMP) was found to be significantly enriched for genes transcribed from remodellable promoters, and also for promoters which are both TATA-less and TFIID dominated (Fig. 3c). In contrast, cluster 4, showing a negative correlation, is enriched for TATA-containing SAGA-dominated promoters, and also promoters not assigned to any category by Rhee and Pugh (34), and which do not show enrichment for the remodellable class of promoters (Fig. 3c). Interestingly, analysis of the promoters controlling transcription in cluster 3 using yeastract (35) (Data Set S3) identified significant enrichment for regulation by the TORC1-dependent transcriptional activator Sfp1p and by the SWI/SNF complex (Snf6p, Snf2p, and Swi3p) and its associated recruitment factor Swi5p. Regulation of cluster 4 is predicted to be dominated by the general stress response transcription factors Msn2p/Msn4p and Sok2p (Fig. 3c).

Induction of ATP cycling increases transcription from promoters regulated by SWI/SNF during steady-state growth on glucose, but not on acetate.

During growth on glucose, a total of 944 transcripts were identified as being significantly changed in their abundance profiles following induction of the ATP-cycling pathway in strain BY4741-112-151 relative to the control (Data Set S4). Changes in the abundances of intracellular nucleotides taking place during this time period are summarized in Fig. 4; they indicate a general decrease in abundance of ATP but an increase in GTP and GEC. Hierarchical clustering of the transcript abundance data identified two clusters of genes whose expression increased at the point where changes in ATP and GTP abundance, and in GEC, are detected in strain BY4741-112-151 during the transition from SS1 to SS2 (clusters 1 and 3 in Fig. 5). Strikingly, the transcripts in cluster 3 encode proteins that are enriched for functions associated with nucleotide binding (GO:0000166 4.69E-09) and ribosome biogenesis (GO:0042254 7014E-08), and there is a significant overlap between the members of this cluster and transcript cluster 3, which correlates with the high-energy nucleotides in the control chemostat analysis in Fig. 3 (82 transcripts, P = 1.01E-47; Fig. 5b). Transcription factor predictions indicate significant regulation of the transcripts in this cluster by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex (Fig. 5c). It is also enriched for genes exhibiting dynamic nucleosome repositioning during the respiratory oscillation cycle and shows significant overlap with the cell growth and anabolic supercluster genes (A, A.B, and B) in this cycle. No particular enrichment for SAGA- or TFIID-dependent promoters was observed.
FIG 4

Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on glucose produces changes in both ATP and GTP abundance. (a) PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced ATP-cycling chemostats, which are illustrated in detail in panel b). All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2.

FIG 5

Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on glucose leads to coherent changes in gene expression. (a) Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-148 (148) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-151 (151) were clustered (Data Set S4), and (b) the clusters were tested for significant overlap with those identified in Fig. 3. The grid presents the number of transcripts shared between each pairwise comparison of clusters, and the color corresponds to the P value of a Fisher exact test analyzing the enrichment. (c) Clusters were further functionally characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3c (Data Set S4).

Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on glucose produces changes in both ATP and GTP abundance. (a) PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced ATP-cycling chemostats, which are illustrated in detail in panel b). All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on glucose leads to coherent changes in gene expression. (a) Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-148 (148) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-151 (151) were clustered (Data Set S4), and (b) the clusters were tested for significant overlap with those identified in Fig. 3. The grid presents the number of transcripts shared between each pairwise comparison of clusters, and the color corresponds to the P value of a Fisher exact test analyzing the enrichment. (c) Clusters were further functionally characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3c (Data Set S4). Analysis of transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed following induction of the ATP-cycling or GTP-cycling pathways during the chemostat growth experiments reported in Fig. 5 and 7 and Fig. S2, S3, S4, and S5. Download Data Set S4, XLSX file, 14.1 MB.
FIG 7

Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway partially inhibits the glucose repression of transcription following the addition of glucose to cultures growing at steady state on acetate. (a) Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-148 (148) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-151 (151) were clustered, and (b) the clusters were functionally characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3c. Data Set S4 provides full details of cluster membership and the enrichment analysis results.

Changes in transcript (a) and nucleotide abundance (b and c) following induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on acetate. Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-148 (148) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-151 (151) were clustered (a) (Data Set S4), and the clusters were characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (d) (Data Set S4). PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (b) (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced ATP-cycling chemostats, which are illustrated in detail in panel c. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Download FIG S2, EPS file, 3.5 MB. Induction of the GTP-cycling pathway has only limited effects on the changes in transcription that occur following the addition of glucose to carbon-limited chemostat cultures growing at steady state on acetate. Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-138 (138) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-141 (141) were clustered (a) (Data Set S4), and the clusters were characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (d) (Data Set S4). PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (b) (scores and loadings plots) identifies the changes taking place that distinguish the induced GTP-cycling chemostats and the glucose-supplemented conditions, which are illustrated in detail in panel c. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Download FIG S3, EPS file, 3.3 MB. Changes in transcript (a) and nucleotide abundance (b and c) following induction of the GTP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on glucose. Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-138 (138) and the GTP-cycling strain BY4741-112-141 (141) were clustered (a) (Data Set S4), and the clusters were characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (d) (Data Set S4). PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (b) (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced GTP-cycling chemostats, which are illustrated in detail in panel c. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Download FIG S4, EPS file, 3.3 MB. Changes in transcript (a) and nucleotide abundance (b and c) following induction of the GTP-cycling pathway during steady-state growth on acetate. Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-138 (138) and the GTP-cycling strain BY4741-112-141 (141) were clustered (a) (Data Set S4), and the clusters were characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (d) (Data Set S4). PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (b) (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced GTP-cycling chemostats, which are illustrated in detail in panel c. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Download FIG S5, EPS file, 3.5 MB. The abundance of GTP increases by 50% from SS1 to SS2 following induction of the ATP-cycling pathway, and there is an increase in the GEC (Fig. 4). ATP, however, notably decreases during this period, accompanied by an increase in cdiAMP, but the AEC is maintained. Therefore, there is a common correlation between the abundance of the transcripts shared between cluster 3 in Fig. 5 and cluster 3 in Fig. 3 only with GTP and GEC. Consistent with the increase in GTP and cdiAMP, the transcription of four genes (ADE1, ADE6, ADE2, and ADE5,7) encoding enzymes for de novo IMP biosynthesis is upregulated following the induction, together with IMD2, GUA1, and ADE12 encoding enzymes for the conversion of IMP to GMP or AMP (Data Set S4). Transcript cluster 1 is, in fact, enriched for purine-containing compound biosynthesis (GO:0072522 3.95E-04), and there is evidence for its regulation by SWI/SNF from remodellable promoters (Fig. 5c). This cluster is also enriched for stress response genes and for genes with functions in the cell periphery and phosphate metabolism (Data Set S4). Genes whose transcription decreased relative to the control, particularly from T2 onwards, are found in cluster 2 but are not significantly enriched for any notable functions. Induction of the futile consumption of ATP in cells grown in carbon-limited chemostats using acetate as the carbon source generated changes in nucleotide composition similar to those observed on glucose (increased cdiAMP, GTP, and GEC and decreased ATP) but did not result in the same changes in gene transcription (Fig. S2 and Data Set S4). Induction of ATP cycling led to a ca. 50% reduction in biomass in the acetate-limited chemostats on transition from SS1 to SS2 (Fig. S1), but this was not accompanied by marked changes in transcription of growth-related genes. Of the 525 differentially expressed transcripts identified, 299 correspond to antisense transcripts (cluster 2 in Fig. S2). GO analysis indicates enrichment for functions associated with respiration encoded by the corresponding genes on the sense strand (GO:0005739 mitochondrion 1.48E-06; GO:0055114 oxidation-reduction process 1.33E-06). Whether the suggested interference in respiration by antisense transcription is related to the observed reduction in biomass is unknown.

The transcriptional response to glucose is dampened by futile ATP consumption.

Glucose is the preferred carbon source for yeast growth and, when provided to cells growing exclusively on a nonfermentable carbon source such as acetate, rapidly causes repression of the transcription of genes required for catabolism of the less favorable energy sources, and induces the transcription of genes required for growth (1, 8). The changes in gene transcription observed for clusters 2/4 and 1 in Fig. 3, respectively, are consistent with this change in carbon and energy metabolism. In the acetate-limited chemostats, comparison of the effects of glucose addition on gene transcription between the control and NTP-cycling strains identified 616 transcripts which behaved significantly differently in the ATP-cycling conditions, but only 13 during GTP cycling (Data Set S4). Both ATP abundance and AEC were consistently lower in the ATP-cycling cultures than in the corresponding control strain during the period following glucose addition, while cAMP, GMP, AMP, pApA, and cdiAMP were higher (Fig. 6). This coincided with a reduction in the extent of repression of a cluster of genes enriched for functions associated with carbon metabolism (cluster 2 in Fig. 7), and also with a decrease in the upregulation of genes enriched for functions associated with cell growth and proliferation (cluster 1 in Fig. 7). In the GTP-cycling chemostat cultures, only the GMP, pGpG, and cdiGMP nucleotides exhibited notable differences in abundance, and their glucose-dependent transcriptional reprogramming was unaffected (Fig. S3).
FIG 6

Operation of the ATP-cycling pathway constitutively reduces ATP abundance and AEC throughout the transition from steady-state growth on acetate to growth on glucose. (a) PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced ATP-cycling chemostats and the glucose-supplemented conditions, which are illustrated in detail in panel b. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2.

Operation of the ATP-cycling pathway constitutively reduces ATP abundance and AEC throughout the transition from steady-state growth on acetate to growth on glucose. (a) PCA of normalized nucleotide abundances (scores and loadings plots) identify the changes taking place that distinguish the induced ATP-cycling chemostats and the glucose-supplemented conditions, which are illustrated in detail in panel b. All nucleotide abundance profiles are available in Data Set S2. Induction of the ATP-cycling pathway partially inhibits the glucose repression of transcription following the addition of glucose to cultures growing at steady state on acetate. (a) Transcripts identified as being significantly differently expressed between chemostats of the control strain BY4741-112-148 (148) and the ATP-cycling strain BY4741-112-151 (151) were clustered, and (b) the clusters were functionally characterized as described in the legend to Fig. 3c. Data Set S4 provides full details of cluster membership and the enrichment analysis results.

Induction of the futile consumption of GTP produces only limited changes in the transcriptome.

Induction of the GTP-cycling pathway generated markedly fewer changes in the transcriptome than induction of ATP cycling in both the glucose and acetate chemostats: 77 transcripts were identified as being significantly changed in abundance relative to the control when grown on glucose, and only 53 during growth on acetate (Fig. S4 and S5 and Data Set S4). Both AEC and GEC remained unaffected by induction in either carbon condition; however, during the progression from SS1 to SS2 in the glucose-limited chemostats, ATP and GTP concentrations both fell, while that of CTP increased.

DISCUSSION

The effects of induction of the ATP-cycling pathway in this study, viewed in the context of the correlations observed between changes in nucleotide levels and the transcriptional programs occurring in cells growing in the control chemostats, support the proposal that yeast gene transcription is responsive to cell energy status (Fig. 8). Our data indicate, for the first time, a significant role for GTP and/or GEC in the signaling process. Since peptide bond formation during protein synthesis predominantly requires GTP, rather than ATP, this suggests a way for the cell to effect a direct linkage between nutritional status and the rate and extent of protein synthesis. This places GTP as a hub molecule whose fluctuations in abundance depend on the interplay between nutrient supply and the rate of protein synthesis and influence the regulation of gene expression (Fig. 8b).
FIG 8

High-energy guanine nucleotides as a signal capable of linking growth to cellular energy status via the control of gene transcription. (a) Summary of the data indicating coordination of anabolic gene transcription with GTP/GEC. (b) GTP as a hub signaling molecule whose fluctuations in abundance depend on the interplay between nutrient supply and the rate of protein synthesis. GTP-binding proteins (regulatory GTPases or components of the actin cytoskeleton) are candidates for the observed modulation of gene transcription.

High-energy guanine nucleotides as a signal capable of linking growth to cellular energy status via the control of gene transcription. (a) Summary of the data indicating coordination of anabolic gene transcription with GTP/GEC. (b) GTP as a hub signaling molecule whose fluctuations in abundance depend on the interplay between nutrient supply and the rate of protein synthesis. GTP-binding proteins (regulatory GTPases or components of the actin cytoskeleton) are candidates for the observed modulation of gene transcription. Three main observations are indicative of the coordination of gene expression by changes in intracellular nucleotide use and composition. First, during continuous growth in chemostats, the transcription of genes required for glucose-dependent yeast cell proliferation was highly correlated with nucleotide indicators of high-energy status such as ATP, GTP, and IMP (Fig. 3 and 8). Second, the transcription of genes with functions associated with anabolic growth processes was upregulated following induction of the ATP-cycling pathway during growth on glucose and showed similarity to sets of genes previously identified as being associated with the oxidative growth phase of a respiratory oscillation cycle (Fig. 5 and 8). Finally, the reprogramming of gene expression that immediately follows release of cultures from dependence on the use of a less favorable nonfermentable carbon source (acetate) by the addition of glucose was partially inhibited during induction of ATP cycling (Fig. 7). This included reductions in the extent of both carbon catabolite repression and induction of ribosome biogenesis. Interestingly, induction of the GTP-cycling pathway under the same conditions could not reproduce these effects, and the consequences of inducing the ATP pathway during steady-state growth on acetate were notably different from those observed on glucose. Transcription of the bacterial pathway genes is comparable in each case (Fig. S1), but we cannot exclude posttranscriptional effects that may lead to differing fluxes through each engineered pathway. The design of the expression systems—where the bacterial synthetase and hydrolase enzymes are carried together on a plasmid that contains no internal regions of homology and whose selection depends on two auxotrophic markers (Fig. 1)—is expected to preclude the generation of subpopulations of cells that have lost either the plasmid or one or both of the bacterial genes. Such events are unlikely to generate subpopulations of any significant size over the moderate number of postinduction cell doublings used in the chemostat experiments (approximately six); however, this has not been formally assessed. The ATP cycling-dependent changes in gene expression observed during steady-state growth on glucose are associated with increased GTP and GEC following induction. Changes in GTP, GEC, or cdiAMP were found to correlate most consistently with the changes in gene transcription, and we exclude cdiAMP, since a previous study revealed minimal effects on yeast gene transcription (36). Induction of intracellular concentrations of cdiAMP more than 5 times higher than the maximum observed in this work significantly changed the expression of only 75 S. cerevisiae genes during batch growth in YNB minimal medium containing 0.5% glucose (36). An important role for GEC and GTP in signaling metabolic status in S. cerevisiae has previously been proposed from an analysis of carbon and energy starvation in recombinant strains of S. cerevisiae engineered to ferment xylose (37). A decrease in guanine nucleotides is also a key signal for the initiation of meiosis and sporulation in yeast (38), and imbalances in guanine nucleotide pools are known to adversely affect cell metabolism and viability (39–41). Systems for sensing and responding to changes in intracellular guanine nucleotide composition therefore clearly exist, and this study provides evidence that they also participate in adjusting gene transcription to cellular energy status. The genes that are the target of this regulation under the experimental conditions used here tend to be those previously identified as possessing remodellable promoters and to be regulated by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, suggesting that one of the signal outputs may be to promote the clearing of nucleosomes from susceptible promoters (21). Our data do not preclude a regulatory role for ATP and AEC sensing. Indeed the changes in gene transcription identified during the glucose derepression experiment more closely correlate with these nucleotides (discussed below). This observation of differing effects under different growth conditions suggests a network of regulation linking high-energy purine nucleotide abundance to gene transcription. The influence of guanine nucleotide status on gene transcription could potentially be mediated by changes in the activation state of GTPases involved in the regulation of transcription in response to nutrient supply, for example Ras1p/Ras2p or Gtr1p/Gtr2p (1, 2, 6, 13). Evidence for an influence of guanine nucleotide pools on the level of active, GTP-bound, Ras2p has previously been reported (13, 15–17), and activation of the Ras2/cAMP/PKA pathway could produce the increase in expression of genes involved in ribosome biogenesis observed in the glucose chemostats in this study (Fig. 5). Another possible route of control could be the balance between GTP and ATP inside the cells and its influence on transcription start site selection by RNA polymerase. One of the clusters of transcripts upregulated in the glucose-grown ATP-cycling chemostat cultures is significantly enriched for gene products which bind purine nucleotide triphosphates (cluster 3 in Fig. 5 and Data Set S4), raising the possibility that transcription of the genes encoding these binding proteins could in some way be sensitive to the prevailing levels of GTP (and/or ATP) in the cell. Interestingly, de novo purine biosynthesis is also upregulated under these conditions consistent with previous observations supporting transcription on demand for the genes in this pathway, controlled via sensing of key metabolic intermediates in the de novo pathway (42). The eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton has also been proposed as an integrative sensor of metabolic status, capable of responding to, and influencing, intracellular concentrations of ATP and GTP through its use of these nucleotides as the energy source for polymerization and through its physical association with numerous metabolic enzymes, the translational apparatus, and mitochondria (43–45). While this is currently only an intriguing hypothesis, a cytoskeletal influence on gene transcription mediated through interactions with upstream kinases and transcription factors can also be imagined. The reduction in glucose repression of gene transcription while the ATP-cycling pathway is fully operative coincides with increased intracellular concentrations of AMP, GMP, and cAMP (and cdiAMP) and with reduced ATP and AEC relative to the control strain (Fig. 7). This attenuation of the repression response under suboptimal energy conditions could make physiological sense, and it suggests a net inhibition of the activity of the Snf1 and Snf3/Rgt2 pathways which are central to the repression of gene transcription by glucose in S. cerevisiae (1, 8). However, Snf1p kinase activity is proposed to be modulated by ADP, not AMP or ATP, and increased activity of the Mig1p carbon-responsive repressor is predicted to result from less favorable energetic conditions. How this could be achieved is, therefore, not clear, although it is worth noting that the details of the in vivo regulation of Snf1p by adenine nucleotides remain to be fully established. Interestingly, ACS1, encoding an acetyl-CoA synthetase isoform expressed preferentially during growth on nonfermentable carbon sources (46), is repressed to only ca. 60% of the extent seen in the control strain (Fig. S6). This would be predicted to have consequences for nuclear acetyl-CoA abundance, with possible downstream effects on nucleosome remodelling and gene expression. Acetyl-CoA has been proposed as a sentinel metabolite capable of influencing chromatin structure, where increased nucleocytoplasmic concentrations increase the level of histone acetylation which in turn promotes nucleosome clearance and expression from susceptible promoter sequences (9, 23). The induction in transcription of growth-related genes in response to glucose addition is also dampened specifically during ATP cycling (Fig. 7). This suggests a reduced signaling through the TORC1 and PKA kinase pathways relative to the control strain under these conditions and implies an influence of nucleotide pools on these pathways. Transcription of genes encoding the two acetyl-CoA synthetase enzymes in S. cerevisiae (ACS1 = TCONS_00000101; ACS2 = TCONS_00006154). Mean values ± standard deviations from triplicate chemostats are shown. Download FIG S6, EPS file, 1.9 MB. We conclude that a fundamental understanding of the global regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription will require a more detailed consideration of guanine nucleotide abundance and how this is signaled to the genome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid constructs and yeast strains.

The synthesis of cyclic diguanine monophosphate (cdiGMP) or cdiAMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was achieved using the engineered constructs previously described (36). For cyclic dinucleotide hydrolysis, synthetic genes designed with yeast codon usage to encode amino acids 395 to 649 of the cdiGMP hydrolase SFV3559 from Shigella flexneri (31) or amino acids 117 to 659 of the cdiAMP hydrolase YybT from Bacillus subtilis (32) were cloned into vectors between promoter and terminator sequences of the yeast gene TDH3. The truncated YybT enzyme lacks the two transmembrane helices present at the N terminus of the wild-type protein, and the C-terminal portion of SVF3559 contains the EAL domain phosphodiesterase active site. The TetO7pr::synthetase (with the VP16::TetR' TetO7 transactivator sequence) and TDH3pr::hydrolase expression constructs were finally combined as required in a centromeric vector pRS-LEU2-URA3 doubly marked with yeast LEU2 and URA3 genes (36) to produce the plasmids listed in Table 1 and illustrated in Fig. 1. All centromeric plasmids were transformed into the yeast laboratory strain BY4741 carrying an integrated copy of the SSN6::TetR fusion construct from pCM242 (26) on plasmid pAH112 (36).

Verifying the activity of engineered strains by DOX induction in batch culture.

Flasks (250 ml) of YNB minimal medium (0.67% [wt/vol] yeast nitrogen base (Sigma) and 0.5% [wt/vol] ammonium sulfate) containing 2% glucose and 5 μg/ml doxycycline (DOX) were inoculated to a starting optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05 from overnight cultures. The inoculated cultures were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm until reaching an OD600 of 0.4 to 0.5 before sampling for intracellular nucleotide extraction. Extracts were analyzed using HPLC-UV.

Analyzing the effect of inducing increases in ATP or GTP consumption during steady-state growth in carbon-limited chemostat cultures.

Chemostat fermentations were performed in triplicate under carbon-limited conditions in minimal media using either glucose or acetate as the carbon source and providing only ammonium sulfate and essential trace nutrients as supplements. For cultures in glucose-grown chemostats, precultures of each strain were prepared by inoculating YNB minimal medium (0.67% [wt/vol] yeast nitrogen base [Sigma] and 0.5% [wt/vol] ammonium sulfate) containing 2% (wt/vol) glucose with a single colony picked from an agar plate and incubating at 30°C 200 rpm for 24 h. Fermentors (2 liters) containing F1 medium (47) (1,000 ml) with 0.25% (wt/vol) glucose were inoculated with aliquots of the precultures to produce a starting OD600 of 0.05 and grown in batch for 24 h (30°C, 750 rpm stirrer speed, aeration with 1 liter min−1 air). Cultures were then switched to continuous mode, maintaining the pH at 4.5 and the dilution rate at 0.11 to 0.12 h−1. Biomass was monitored offline at regular intervals by measuring UV absorbance at a wavelength of 600 nm, and the purity of the cultures was routinely checked by phase-contrast microscopy. Initial steady-state culture conditions (designated SS1) were deemed to have been established after more than five vessel volume changes and with cultures exhibiting a constant biomass at which point, culture samples were taken for analysis. For induction, DOX was added to the steady-state cultures to produce a final concentration of 5 μg/ml. Culture samples were harvested for analysis at 3, 6, and 9 h after induction, and a final sample taken after the cultures had reached a new steady state (SS2), as determined by the passage of six vessel volume changes and with cultures exhibiting a constant biomass. A similar protocol was followed for the acetate-grown chemostat experiments, except the initial preculture was performed for 42 h in YNB minimal medium containing 0.5% (wt/vol) sodium acetate and 1% (wt/vol) glucose. This was used to inoculate batch growth in fermentors containing YNB minimal medium with 0.5% (wt/vol) sodium acetate and 0.05% (wt/vol) glucose and then switched to continuous mode using only 0.5% (wt/vol) sodium acetate as the carbon source and controlling the pH at 5.0 and the dilution rate at 0.07 to 0.08 h−1. YNB was used in preference to F1 medium, since strains grew less well in the latter when only acetate was present as the carbon source. After taking the induced steady-state samples, designated SS2, an additional experiment was performed to analyze the response to adding glucose to the respiring, induced cultures. Glucose (40% [wt/vol]) was added to each fermentor (and to the feed for each fermentor) to produce a final concentration of 1.6% (wt/vol), and culture samples were taken for RNA and intracellular nucleotide extraction at 15 min (designated G1), 30 min (designated G2), and 60 min (designated G3) after glucose addition. All nucleotide extracts from the chemostat experiments were analyzed using the LC-MS method.

Preparation of intracellular nucleotide extracts.

Cell metabolism in culture samples was immediately quenched by transferring culture aliquots (10 ml) directly to methanol (40 ml) cooled to below −60°C on dry ice and standing for 2 min. Cells from quenched samples were harvested by centrifugation at −20°C and extracted by resuspension in ice-cold 1 N formic acid containing 10% butan-1-ol, standing on ice for 60 min. Cells were removed from extracts by centrifugation at −20°C, and the supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-μm filter and stored frozen at −80°C. Frozen extracts were evaporated to dryness by freeze-drying and finally reconstituted in 200 μl water.

Analysis of intracellular nucleotides by HPLC-UV.

Separation and quantification of intracellular nucleotides by HPLC-UV were performed essentially by the method of Strauch et al. (48) using an Agilent HP1100 HPLC. Briefly, aliquots of nucleotide extracts were separated at 20°C by anion-exchange chromatography using a Partisil 10SAX column (10-μm particle size; 25 cm by 4.6 mm internal diameter). Gradient elution was performed by the following gradient elution program using mobile phase A (MPA) (7 mM potassium hydrogen phosphate [pH 4.0]) and mobile phase B (MPB) (0.5 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate–0.5 M sodium sulfate pH 5.4) and a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min: 0 to 5 min, 100% MPA; 5 to 10 min, 100% to 85% MPA; 10 to 15 min, 85% to 81% MPA; 15 to 20 min, 81% to 50% MPA; 20 to 25 min, 50% to 30% MPA; 25 to 30 min, 30% to 25% MPA; 30 to 40 min, 30% to 0% MPA (postrun equilibration, 100% MPA for 15 min). Eluting nucleotides were detected using a UV diode-array detector and quantified by their absorbance at 254 nm in comparison to known standards. Quantified values in picomoles were normalized to the cells present in 1 ml of a culture with an OD600 value of 1. All nucleotide standards were purchased from Sigma, with the exception of cdiAMP, cdiGMP, pApA, and pGpG which came from Biolog.

Analysis of intracellular nucleotides by LC-MS.

Separation and quantification of intracellular nucleotides by LC-MS were performed using an Agilent HP1290 LC system attached to an Agilent 6460 triple quad mass spectrometer by a method based on one devised for the analysis of thiopurine nucleotides (49). Briefly, aliquots of nucleotide extracts were separated at 30°C by anion-exchange chromatography using a Biobasic AX column (5-μm particle size; 5 cm by 2.1 mm internal diameter) and the following gradient elution program using mobile phase A (MPA) (10 mM ammonium acetate in water-acetonitrile [7:3] [pH 6]) and mobile phase B (MPB) (1 mM ammonium acetate in water-acetonitrile [7:3] [pH 10.5]): 0% to 100% MPB in 5.75 min (postrun equilibration 100% MPA for 4.25 min) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Nucleotides were detected in the mass spectrometer using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with the following settings: capillary voltage, 3,500 V; nozzle voltage, 1,000 V; drying gas flow, 10 liters/min; drying gas temperature, 325°C; nebulizer pressure, 10 lb/in2; sheath gas flow, 11 liters/min; sheath gas temperature, 350°C. Nitrogen was used as the sheath, nebulizer, drying, and collision gases. Quantification was performed using the Agilent MassHunter software using calibration curves generated from the contemporary analysis of known standards. Quantified values in picomoles were normalized to the value for cells present in 1 ml of a culture with an OD600 value of 1 and then processed to generate the same total value of common nucleotides in each sample for each chemostat condition (growth in glucose or acetate). The following MRM mass transitions (listed as parent ion mass to fragment ion mass) were used for detection and identification of the nucleotides in the positive ion mode (except for UDP-glucose, which was detected in the negative ion mode): ATP, 508.1 to 136.0; ADP, 428.2 to 136.0; AMP, 348.2 to 136.0; cAMP, 330.2 to 136.0; cdiAMP, 659.4 to 136.1; pApA, 677.5 to 136.1; GTP, 524.2 to 152.0; GDP, 444.2 to 152.0; GMP, 364.2 to 152.0; cdiGMP, 691.4 to 152.2; pGpG, 709.4 to 152.2; IMP, 349.2 to 157.0; UTP, 485.1 to 97.0; UDP, 405.1 to 97.0; UMP, 325.1 to 97.0; UDP-glucose, 565.3 to 323.0; CTP, 484.1 to 112.0; CDP, 404.2 to 112.0; CMP, 325.1 to 112.0.

Isolation of total RNA.

Cells from culture samples were harvested rapidly by centrifugation, and the cell pellets were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until required. For RNA purification, frozen cells were resuspended in TRIzol (Invitrogen) and lysed mechanically at 4°C by bead beating using a FastPrep homogenizer (MP Biomedicals; five 1-min cycles of shaking at 6 m/s). DNA and protein were removed from the lysed samples by extraction with chloroform (twice), and total RNA was purified using RNeasy columns (Qiagen).

Transcriptomics analysis using RNAseq.

Strand-specific transcriptome sequencing was performed by a commercial sequencing provider using an Illumina HiSeq sequencer. Poly(A)-containing mRNA molecules were purified and sequenced to provide a minimum of 15 million 50-bp single-end reads per sample. Sequencing reads were mapped to the S. cerevisiae S288C genome sequence (modified to include the heterologous genes introduced) using tophat v2.0.14 (50), employing the default settings with the following exceptions: min-intron length = 25; max-intron length = 1,500. A universal set of transcripts was assembled from all the data using stringTie (51), combining the result with the reference genome annotation S288C_reference_genome_R64-2-1_20150113 (http://www.yeastgenome.org/). Mapped reads were processed and analyzed in R (52). Reads mapping to features were counted using Rsubread (53), and the transcript counts were TMM normalized and tested for differential expression using the limma voom method (54, 55) with limma treat (56). Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using goseq (57), and principal components analysis was realized using pcaMethods (58). To identify sets of differentially expressed transcripts in each chemostat experiment, the null hypothesis that the change in transcript abundance relative to the preinduced/pretreated time point was equal in each control and NTP-cycling strain pair was assumed, e.g., [NTP.SS2 − NTP.SS1] − [Ctrl.SS2 − Ctrl.SS1] = 0 or [NTP.G3 − NTP.SS2] − [Ctrl.G3 − Ctrl.SS2] = 0. A limma treat transcript fold change threshold of 1.25 was used. The analysis was performed for each postinduction/posttreatment time point, and the transcripts identified as being significantly (q ≤ 0.05) differently expressed in each experiment were combined. The abundance profiles of significant transcripts were clustered, and each cluster was subjected to GO analysis, regulatory interaction enrichment analysis using yeastract (35), and enrichment analysis for membership of functionally associated groups obtained from the literature using Fisher’s exact test.

Other data analysis.

Correlations between nucleotide and transcript abundance data were analyzed using the mixOmics R package (mixOmics: Omics data integration project [http://mixomics.org/]). Nucleotide abundances were log2 transformed prior to correlation with normalized RPKM transcript abundance values obtained from the limma voom normalized count data. Pearson correlations were calculated using “correlation” and “ward” as the distance and clustering settings, respectively, and applying the threshold values stated in the text (minimum, 0.7).

Accession number(s).

RNAseq data are available in the ArrayExpress database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-5174.
  57 in total

1.  Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes.

Authors:  Benjamin P Tu; Andrzej Kudlicki; Maga Rowicka; Steven L McKnight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  pcaMethods--a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data.

Authors:  Wolfram Stacklies; Henning Redestig; Matthias Scholz; Dirk Walther; Joachim Selbig
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses.

Authors:  Ruijie Liu; Aliaksei Z Holik; Shian Su; Natasha Jansz; Kelan Chen; Huei San Leong; Marnie E Blewitt; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Gordon K Smyth; Matthew E Ritchie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Nutrient sensing and signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michaela Conrad; Joep Schothorst; Harish Nag Kankipati; Griet Van Zeebroeck; Marta Rubio-Texeira; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Geo M Pertea; Corina M Antonescu; Tsung-Cheng Chang; Joshua T Mendell; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Acetyl-CoA induces cell growth and proliferation by promoting the acetylation of histones at growth genes.

Authors:  Ling Cai; Benjamin M Sutter; Bing Li; Benjamin P Tu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  The yin and yang of yeast transcription: elements of a global feedback system between metabolism and chromatin.

Authors:  Rainer Machné; Douglas B Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts.

Authors:  Charity W Law; Yunshun Chen; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: a systems biology study in yeast.

Authors:  Alex Gutteridge; Pinar Pir; Juan I Castrillo; Philip D Charles; Kathryn S Lilley; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Geo Pertea; Cole Trapnell; Harold Pimentel; Ryan Kelley; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pyruvate kinase variant of fission yeast tunes carbon metabolism, cell regulation, growth and stress resistance.

Authors:  Stephan Kamrad; Jan Grossbach; Maria Rodríguez-López; Michael Mülleder; StJohn Townsend; Valentina Cappelletti; Gorjan Stojanovski; Clara Correia-Melo; Paola Picotti; Andreas Beyer; Markus Ralser; Jürg Bähler
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 13.068

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.