Literature DB >> 30669060

Alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies as a mediator of the relationship between drinking motives and risky sexual behaviors.

Alison Looby1, Adrian J Bravo2, Tess M Kilwein3, Lauren Zimmerman3, Matthew R Pearson2.   

Abstract

Risky sexual behaviors (RSB) frequently occur in the context of alcohol use and are associated with distinct drinking motives among college students. Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) is associated with reductions in alcohol use and related problems, which may extend to alcohol-related RSB. Moreover, as PBS use mediates the relationship between positive reinforcement drinking motives and alcohol-related problems, the same may be true for alcohol-related RSB, specifically. The current study examined whether PBS mediates the relationship between drinking motives and RSB among college students. Participants (N = 2039, 72.8% female, Mage = 19.79) from ten universities across ten U.S. states completed an online survey assessing past-month drinking motivation, alcohol PBS, alcohol consumption, and RSB. To test study aims, a saturated path model in which drinking motives were modeled as predictors of RSB via PBS use subscales and alcohol consumption was conducted. Several double mediation effects were found, such that stronger endorsement of motives (i.e., social, enhancement, conformity, coping for depression) were associated with lower PBS (particularly manner of drinking and serious harm reduction), which was associated with higher alcohol use, which was associated with higher RSB. Multi-group models found the mediation effects to be gender invariant, although several differences in direct associations were found across genders. For college students high in positive reinforcement motives (i.e., social or enhancement) for drinking, interventions that aim to increase PBS use, specifically related to modifying the manner in which one drinks and avoiding very dangerous consequences, may be effective in reducing alcohol-related RSB.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol use; College students; Drinking motives; Protective behavioral strategies; Risky sexual behavior

Year:  2019        PMID: 30669060      PMCID: PMC6488375          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  57 in total

1.  Planned missing data designs in psychological research.

Authors:  John W Graham; Bonnie J Taylor; Allison E Olchowski; Patricio E Cumsille
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-12

Review 2.  Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.

Authors:  David M Erceg-Hurn; Vikki M Mirosevich
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2008-10

3.  Protective behavioral strategies and the relationship between depressive symptoms and alcohol-related negative consequences among college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Jessica L Martin; E Suzanne Hatchett; Roneferiti M Fowler; Kristie M Fleming; Michael A Karakashian; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2008-10

4.  Unique direct and indirect effects of impulsivity-like traits on alcohol-related outcomes via protective behavioral strategies.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Benjamin A Kite; James M Henson
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2012

5.  In the process of drinking to cope among college students: An examination of specific vs. global coping motives for depression and anxiety symptoms.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  The influence of motives on alcohol- and sex-related behaviors among female college students.

Authors:  Brittany E Blanchard; Angela K Stevens; Ileana S Acosta; Amelia E Talley; Jennifer L Brown; Andrew K Littlefield
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Drinking motives, protective behavioral strategies, and experienced consequences: Identifying students at risk.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences.

Authors:  Joseph W Labrie; Andrew Lac; Shannon R Kenney; Tehniat Mirza
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  HIV risk-related behaviors in the United States household population aged 15-44 years: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 and 2006-2010.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Veena G Billioux; Casey E Copen; Catlainn Sionean
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2012-01-19

10.  A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences?

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac; Leslie J Lewis; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  4 in total

1.  Protective behavioral strategies predict alcohol-related problems among injured patients following a brief intervention.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Osvaldo F Morera; Craig A Field
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Internalizing Symptoms, Alcohol Use, and Protective Behavioral Strategies: Associations with Regretted Sexual Experiences of College Students.

Authors:  Roselyn Peterson; Robert D Dvorak; Jacqueline Woerner; Melissa A Lewis
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 3.  Rethinking Unhealthy Alcohol Use in the United States: A Structured Review.

Authors:  Joseph R Volpicelli; Percy Menzies
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2022-07-22

4.  Further validation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire for assessing motivations for responsible drinking: A test of self-determination theory.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Craig A Field
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.