Literature DB >> 24229842

A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences?

Lucy E Napper1, Shannon R Kenney, Andrew Lac, Leslie J Lewis, Joseph W LaBrie.   

Abstract

Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are skills that can be used to reduce the risk of alcohol-related negative consequences. Studies have shown that, in general, PBS are related to less alcohol consumption and fewer negative consequences; however, other studies have suggested that not all types of PBS (e.g., stopping/limiting drinking [SLD], manner of drinking [MOD] and serious harm reduction [SHR]) are equally effective at reducing alcohol risk. In addition, few studies have explored the longitudinal relationships among PBS, alcohol use and consequences. Using a sample of heavy drinking college students (N=338), the current study examined PBS use, alcohol consumption and consequences across two time points three months apart. Cross-lagged panel models revealed that MOD predicted a reduction in alcohol use and negative consequences. SHR was longitudinally related to fewer negative consequences, but unrelated to alcohol use. SLD was not associated with drinking or consequences at follow-up. These results highlight the need for future research to examine the effects of different types of PBS and have implications for alcohol intervention programs that incorporate PBS skills training.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; College students; Consequences; Protective behavioral strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24229842      PMCID: PMC3919439          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  35 in total

1.  Modern robust data analysis methods: measures of central tendency.

Authors:  Rand R Wilcox; H J Keselman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-09

2.  Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Kari K Taylor; Krista M Damann; Jennifer C Page; Emily S Mowry; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

3.  The relationship between drinking control strategies and college student alcohol use.

Authors:  Dawn E Sugarman; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09

Review 4.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Jessica M Cronce
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students.

Authors:  M Dolores Cimini; Matthew P Martens; Mary E Larimer; Jason R Kilmer; Clayton Neighbors; Joseph M Monserrat
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2009-07

6.  Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Jessica L Martin; Andrew K Littlefield; James G Murphy; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences.

Authors:  Joseph W Labrie; Andrew Lac; Shannon R Kenney; Tehniat Mirza
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Christine M Lee; Jason R Kilmer; Patricia M Fabiano; Christopher B Stark; Irene M Geisner; Kimberly A Mallett; Ty W Lostutter; Jessica M Cronce; Maggie Feeney; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-04

9.  Persistence of heavy drinking and ensuing consequences at heavy drinking colleges.

Authors:  Toben F Nelson; Ziming Xuan; Hang Lee; Elissa R Weitzman; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Justin F Hummer; Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  30 in total

1.  The efficacy of a standalone protective behavioral strategies intervention for students accessing mental health services.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Lucy E Napper; Elizabeth M Grimaldi; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-07

2.  The role of underutilization of protective behavioral strategies in the relation of social anxiety with risky drinking.

Authors:  Meredith A Terlecki; Anthony H Ecker; Julia D Buckner
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Drinking to cope mediates the relationship between depression and alcohol risk: Different pathways for college and non-college young adults.

Authors:  Shannon R Kenney; Bradley J Anderson; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Weekend versus Weekday Alcohol Use: Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Lac; Lindsay Handren; William D Crano
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-10

5.  Profiles of motivations for responsible drinking among college students: A self-determination theory perspective.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Craig A Field
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: Psychometric properties of a French and German version among young males in Switzerland.

Authors:  Véronique S Grazioli; Joseph Studer; Mary E Larimer; Melissa A Lewis; Simon Marmet; Mélissa Lemoine; Jean-Bernard Daeppen; Gerhard Gmel
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  The Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: improved content validity of the Serious Harm Reduction subscale.

Authors:  Hayley Treloar; Matthew P Martens; Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  Are protective behavioral strategies associated with fewer negative consequences on high-intensity drinking days? Results from a measurement-burst design.

Authors:  Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Brian H Calhoun; Megan E Patrick; Jennifer L Maggs
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2018-10-25

9.  Endorsement of the "firewater myth" affects the use of protective behavioral strategies among American Indian and Alaska Native students.

Authors:  Vivian M Gonzalez; Adrian J Bravo; Maria C Crouch
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Alcohol abstinence or harm-reduction? Parental messages for college-bound light drinkers.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Sarah C Boyle; Lucy E Napper
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.