Literature DB >> 28097355

Effect of Etelcalcetide vs Placebo on Serum Parathyroid Hormone in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

Geoffrey A Block1, David A Bushinsky2, John Cunningham3, Tilman B Drueke4, Markus Ketteler5, Reshma Kewalramani6, Kevin J Martin7, T Christian Mix6, Sharon M Moe8, Uptal D Patel9, Justin Silver10, David M Spiegel6, Lulu Sterling6, Liron Walsh6, Glenn M Chertow11.   

Abstract

Importance: Secondary hyperparathyroidism contributes to extraskeletal complications in chronic kidney disease. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the intravenous calcimimetic etelcalcetide on serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations in patients receiving hemodialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two parallel, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled treatment trials were conducted in 1023 patients receiving hemodialysis with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Trial A was conducted in 508 patients at 111 sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, Russia, and Australia from March 12, 2013, to June 12, 2014; trial B was conducted in 515 patients at 97 sites in the same countries from March 12, 2013, to May 12, 2014. Interventions: Intravenous administration of etelcalcetide (n = 503) or placebo (n = 513) after each hemodialysis session for 26 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving greater than 30% reduction from baseline in mean PTH during weeks 20-27. A secondary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving mean PTH of 300 pg/mL or lower.
Results: The mean age of the 1023 patients was 58.2 (SD, 14.4) years and 60.4% were men. Mean PTH concentrations at baseline and during weeks 20-27 were 849 and 384 pg/mL vs 820 and 897 pg/mL in the etelcalcetide and placebo groups, respectively, in trial A; corresponding values were 845 and 363 pg/mL vs 852 and 960 pg/mL in trial B. Patients randomized to etelcalcetide were significantly more likely to achieve the primary efficacy end point: in trial A, 188 of 254 (74.0%) vs 21 of 254 (8.3%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 65.7% (95% CI, 59.4%-72.1%) and in trial B, 192 of 255 (75.3%) vs 25 of 260 (9.6%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 65.7% (95% CI, 59.3%-72.1%). Patients randomized to etelcalcetide were significantly more likely to achieve a PTH level of 300 pg/mL or lower: in trial A, 126 of 254 (49.6%) vs 13 of 254 (5.1%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 44.5% (95% CI, 37.8%-51.2%) and in trial B, 136 of 255 (53.3%) vs 12 of 260 (4.6%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 48.7% (95% CI, 42.1%-55.4%). In trials A and B, respectively, patients receiving etelcalcetide had more muscle spasms (12.0% and 11.1% vs 7.1% and 6.2% with placebo), nausea (12.4% and 9.1% vs 5.1% and 7.3%), and vomiting (10.4% and 7.5% vs 7.1% and 3.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients receiving hemodialysis with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, use of etelcalcetide compared with placebo resulted in greater reduction in serum PTH over 26 weeks. Further studies are needed to assess clinical outcomes as well as longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01788046.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28097355     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.19456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  42 in total

Review 1.  Formulary Drug Review: Etelcalcetide.

Authors:  Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  The Effect of Extended Release Niacin on Markers of Mineral Metabolism in CKD.

Authors:  Rakesh Malhotra; Ronit Katz; Andrew Hoofnagle; Andrew Bostom; Dena E Rifkin; Ruth Mcbride; Jeffrey Probstfield; Geoffrey Block; Joachim H Ix
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Second Chances to Improve ESRD Outcomes With a Second-Generation Calcimimetic.

Authors:  John P Middleton; Myles Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Controversies in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ezequiel Bellorin-Font; George Vasquez-Rios; Kevin J Martin
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and related disorders.

Authors:  Janet Y Lee; Dolores M Shoback
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.690

Review 6.  Old and New Drugs for the Management of Bone Disorders in CKD.

Authors:  Hirotaka Komaba; Markus Ketteler; John Cunningham; Masafumi Fukagawa
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Parathyroidectomy in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Wei Ling Lau; Yoshitsugu Obi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  A Decision-Analytic Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Etelcalcetide vs. Cinacalcet.

Authors:  Björn Stollenwerk; Sergio Iannazzo; Ron Akehurst; Michael Adena; Andrew Briggs; Bastian Dehmel; Patrick Parfrey; Vasily Belozeroff
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Etelcalcetide (Parsabiv) for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jena Patel; Mary Barna Bridgeman
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-07

Review 10.  Etelcalcetide for Treating Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: An Evidence Review Group Evaluation of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Authors:  Micah Rose; Jonathan Shepherd; Petra Harris; Karen Pickett; Joanne Lord
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.