Literature DB >> 30665250

Diagnostic Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Procedures in Germany: Update and Handling.

Alexander Schegerer1, Reinhard Loose2, Lothar J Heuser3, Gunnar Brix1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent developments in medical technology have broadened the spectrum of X-ray procedures and changed exposure practice in X-ray facilities. For this reason, diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures were updated in 2016 and 2018, respectively. It is the aim of this paper to present the procedure for the update of the DRLs and to give advice on their practical application.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the determination of DRLs, data from different independent sources that collect dose-relevant data from different facilities in Germany were considered. Seven different weight intervals were specified for classifying pediatric X-ray procedures. For each X-ray procedure considered, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of the respective national distribution of the dose-relevant parameters were determined. Additionally, effective doses that correspond to the DRLs were estimated.
RESULTS: In procedures with already existing DRLs before 2016, the values were lowered by circa 20 % on average. Numerous DRLs were established for the first time (9 for interventional procedures, 10 for CT examinations).
CONCLUSION: For dose optimizations even below the new national DRLs, the BfS recommends establishing local reference levels, using dose management software (particularly in CT and interventional radiology), adapting dose-relevant parameters of X-ray protocols to the individual patient size, and establishing internal radiation protection teams responsible for optimizing X-ray procedures in clinical practice. When applying good medical practice and using modern equipment, the median dose values of the nationwide dose distributions can not only be easily achieved but can even be undercut. KEY POINTS: · German diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) für diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures were updated in 2016 and 2018, respectively.. · For X-ray procedures for which DRLs existed already before the update, the updated DLRs were lowered by circa 20 %, on average.. · For CT and interventional radiology, new DRLs were established.. · X-ray procedures have to be optimized even below the DRLs.. CITATION FORMAT: · Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ et al. Diagnostic Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Procedures in Germany: Update and Handling. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 739 - 751. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30665250     DOI: 10.1055/a-0824-7603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  13 in total

1.  Reasons to consider prostatic artery embolization.

Authors:  Dominik Abt; Hans-Peter Schmid; Mark J Speakman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product.

Authors:  Xinhua Li; Joshua Adam Hirsch; Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Theodore Alan Marschall; Bob Liu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Use of weight-based vs age-based groupings in the study of typical values of air kerma area product (PKA) for paediatric radiographs of chest and abdomen.

Authors:  Ioannis Delakis; Charlotte Kelly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels of Pediatric Abdominopelvic and Chest CT Examinations Based on the Body Weight and Size in Korea.

Authors:  Jae Yeon Hwang; Young Hun Choi; Hee Mang Yoon; Young Jin Ryu; Hyun Joo Shin; Hyun Gi Kim; So Mi Lee; Sun Kyung You; Ji Eun Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; Charlotte Schneider; Sophia Kronthaler; Florian T Gassert; Christof Böhm; Daniela Pfeiffer; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Markus Wurm; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerhard Kütterer; Pierre J Kicken; Marij J Frantzen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

7.  Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation with Augmented Reality for Lateral Approaches to the Spine.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Andreas Kirschbaum; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  CT based PSI blocks for osteotomies around the knee provide accurate results when intraoperative imaging is used.

Authors:  Peter Savov; Mara Hold; Maximilian Petri; Hauke Horstmann; Christian von Falck; Max Ettinger
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-06-26

9.  Estimation of radiation exposure of children undergoing superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma treatment: assessment of local diagnostic reference levels as a function of age, sex, and interventional success.

Authors:  Marcel Opitz; Denise Bos; Cornelius Deuschl; Alexander Radbruch; Sebastian Zensen; Selma Sirin; Michael Forsting; Nikolaos Bechrakis; Eva Biewald; Norbert Bornfeld; Petra Ketteler; Beate Timmermann; Martin Stuschke; Maja Guberina; Axel Wetter; Sophia Göricke; Nika Guberina
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  [Comparison of radiation exposure in common hepatic interventions : A retrospective analysis of DeGIR registry data].

Authors:  Jonathan Nadjiri; Tobias Geith; Tobias Waggershauser; Lothar Heuser; Dominik Morhard; Arno Bücker; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.