| Literature DB >> 30662438 |
Yuqiang Cheng1, Minxiang Lun1, Yunxia Liu1, Hengan Wang1, Yaxian Yan1, Jianhe Sun1.
Abstract
TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) is involved in innate immunity, prompting transcriptional induction of type I interferons in response to pathogenic infection. Many studies have focused on mammals but the function of TBK1 in chickens remains poorly defined. CRISPR/Cas9 system has made gene-knockout easy to accomplish. Although CRISPR/Cas9 has been used in chicken cells, low mutation efficiency limits its wide application in chickens. In this study, an effective gene-knockout system was developed based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system in chicken embryonic fibroblast DF-1. Two CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids were constructed, TBK1-g1 and TBK1-g2, which express gRNAs targeting different sequences of the chicken TBK1 gene. After transfection and enrichment with puromycin screening, the mutation rates as assessed via T7E1 assay were 88.05 and 89.55%, respectively, and subsequent sequence analysis showed mutation efficiencies of 86.67 and 93.33%. With the limiting-dilution method, a chTBK1 gene-deficiency monoclonal cell line was obtained and was named DF-1-TBK1-C3. The DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells exhibited normal morphology and maintained stable proliferation ability compared to wild-type cells. The gene-overexpression system and luciferase reporter assay showed that IFN-β induction induced by chSTING was almost completely blocked in DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells. With quantitative real-time PCR, we further confirmed the essential role of chTBK1 in the chSTING-mediated IFN-β induction. At last, the study demonstrated that the chTBK1 knockout system is also applicable in primary chick embryo fibroblasts (CEFs). In this study, an effective gene-knockout system was applied in chickens, a TBK1 gene-deleted DF-1 cell line was successfully created using this system, and with the chTBK1 knockout cells, chTBK1 was revealed to be indispensable in STING-mediated IFN-β activation in chicken cells.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; IFN-β; TBK1; chicken; innate immunity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30662438 PMCID: PMC6328437 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Primers used in sequence analysis for detection of indels.
| TBK1-g1 | F: TGTTGAGTTTGGTTTCGGTTTTGTGT | 500 |
| R: GTAACTGCATAGAACTCTAATTCAGTG | 500 | |
| TBK1-g2 | F: GTTAAATCTGGGTTTCCATTTTTCC | 630 |
| R: CTTCTTGAGATGGCTTTGAAGAAAC | 630 |
Primers used for Quantitative real-time PCR.
| IFN-β | qIFN-β-F | CCTCAACCAGATCCAGCATT |
| qIFN-β-R | GGATGAGGCTGTGAGAGGAG | |
| Mx-1 | qMx-1-F | GTTTCGGACATGGGGAGTAA |
| qMx-1-R | GCATACGATTTCTTCAACTTTGG | |
| PKR | qPKR -F | TGCTTGACTGGAAAGGCTACT |
| qPKR -R | TCAGTCAAGAATAAACCATGTGTG |
Figure 1Construction of CRISPR/Cas9 vector. (A) Schematic diagram of chicken TBK1 gene and target-site position. Two target sites were designed based on the sequence at exons 1 and 2. (B) Schematic diagram of CRISPR/Cas9 vector used in this study. (C) Sequencing results showing that gRNA1 and gRNA2 have been completely connected to the CRISPR/Cas9 vector.
Figure 2Generation and identification of chTBK1 knockout DF-1 cell line, DF-1-TBK1-C3. (A) Mutant cell enrichment using puromycin screening. (B) Results of T7EI assay showing high knockout efficiency of both gRNA-1 and gRNA-2. (C) Evaluation of knockout efficiency of TBK1-g1 and TBK1-g2 by cloning and sequencing. (D) Sequencing results of targeted regions of DF-1-TBK1-C3 monoclonal cells. Alignment of DNA sequences between wild-type and DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells showed homozygous mutation with an 11-bp deletion. (E) The chTBK1 protein was not detectable in DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells by Western blot analysis.
Figure 3Knockout of chTBK1 to Block chSTING-mediated IFN-β Production. (A) Proliferation of DF-1-TBK1-C3 cell line (TBK1−/−) using CCK8 assay. (B) Knockout of chTBK1 blocks IFN-β production induced by chSTING overexpression. DF-1 or TBK1-C-3 cells were cotransfected with 100 ng/well chSTING or empty vector with 100 ng/well pGL-chIFN-β-Luc with 20 ng/well pRL-TK. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after cotransfection. (C–E) DF-1 or TBK1-C-3 cells were transfected with 100 ng/well chSTING plasmid, 24 h after transfection, the cells were harvest, and IFN-β (C), Mx-1 (D), and PKR (E) mRNAs were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) as determined by Student's t-test.
Figure 4The chTBK1 knockout cell line was stable. (A) Sequencing results for the regions of g20-DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells targeted using CRISPR/Cas9. Alignment of DNA sequences between the wild-type and the g20-DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells showed homozygous mutation with an 11-bp deletion. (B) DF-1 cells and g20-DF-1-TBK1-C3 cells were lysed and analyzed using Western blot.
Figure 5The chTBK1 knockout system was applicable in CEFs. (A) Knockout efficiency of CEF cells transfected with TBK1-g2 were evaluated by cloning and sequencing. The knockout efficiency was calculated as “meaningful deletion or insertion clones/all clones.” (B) CEF or CEF-TBK1-g2 cells were cotransfected with either 100 ng/well of chSTING or empty vector with luciferase reporter plasmids. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after cotransfection. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) as determined by Student's t-test.