Literature DB >> 30657945

Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient-prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of 108 182 patients.

Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá1,2,3, Martinha Millianny Barros de Carvalho2,3, Dário Celestino Sobral Filho2,3, Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti1,2, Sérgio da Costa Rayol1,2, Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz1,2, Alexandre Motta Menezes1,2, Marie-Annick Clavel4, Philippe Pibarot4, Ricardo Carvalho Lima1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on the risk of perioperative, early-, mid- and long-term mortality rates after surgical aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: Databases were searched for studies published until March 2018. The main outcomes of interest were perioperative mortality, 1-year mortality, 5-year mortality and 10-year mortality.
RESULTS: The search yielded 3761 studies for inclusion. Of these, 70 articles were analysed, and their data were extracted. The total number of patients included was 108 182 who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. The incidence of PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement was 53.7% (58 116 with PPM and 50 066 without PPM). Perioperative mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.491, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.302-1.707; P < 0.001], 1-year mortality (OR 1.465, 95% CI 1.277-1.681; P < 0.001), 5-year mortality (OR 1.358, 95% CI 1.218-1.515; P < 0.001) and 10-year mortality (OR 1.534, 95% CI 1.290-1.825; P < 0.001) were increased in patients with PPM. Both severe PPM and moderate PPM were associated with increased risk of perioperative mortality, 1-year mortality, 5-year mortality and 10-year mortality when analysed together and separately, although we observed a higher risk in the group with severe PPM.
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/severe PPM increases perioperative, early-, mid- and long-term mortality rates proportionally to its severity. The findings of this study support the implementation of surgical strategies to prevent PPM in order to decrease mortality rates.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Heart valve prosthesis; Meta-analysis; Prosthesis–patient mismatch

Year:  2019        PMID: 30657945     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Masaki Miyasaka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Negatively Affects Outcomes after Mitral Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of 10,239 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

3.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Neither Uncommon nor Harmless.

Authors:  Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Felipe Augusto Santos Saragiotto; Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz; Frederico Browne Correia de Araujo E Sá; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Frederico Pires Vasconcelos Silva; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-01

4.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on 1-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-analysis of 71,106 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Felipe Augusto Santos Sarargiotto; Álvaro Monteiro Perazzo; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouveia Silva Diniz; Frederico Browne Correia Araújo Sá; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-01

5.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerated transcatheter aortic valves: the TRANSIT-PPM international project.

Authors:  Luca Testa; Matteo Casenghi; Enrico Criscione; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Didier Tchétché; Anita W Asgar; Ole De Backer; Azeem Latib; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio Stefanini; Carlo Trani; Francesco Giannini; Antonio Bartorelli; Wojtek Wojakowski; Maciej Dabrowski; Dariusz Jagielak; Adrian P Banning; Rajesh Kharbanda; Raul Moreno; Joachim Schofer; Christina Brinkmann; Niels van Royen; Duane Pinto; Antoni Serra; Amit Segev; Arturo Giordano; Nedy Brambilla; Mauro Agnifili; Antonio Popolo Rubbio; Mattia Squillace; Jacopo Oreglia; Rudolph Tanja; James M McCabe; Alexander Abizaid; Michiel Voskuil; Rui Teles; Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Lars Sondergaard; Francesco Bedogni
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-29

6.  Ex vivo evaluation of the Ozaki procedure in comparison with the native aortic valve and prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Michael Scharfschwerdt; Tim Schaller; Najla Sadat; Anas Aboud; Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  Immediate Outcomes of Aortic Valve Neocuspidization with Glutaraldehyde-treated Autologous Pericardium: a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Vagram Arutyunyan; Igor Chernov; Roman Komarov; Yuriy Sinelnikov; Bakytbek Kadyraliev; Soslan Enginoev; Maxim Tcheglov; Alisher Ismailbaev; Aleksey Baranov; Fatali Ashurov; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Michel Pompeu; Alexander Weymann; Konstantin Zhigalov
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  The fallacy of indexed effective orifice area charts to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch after prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Michiel D Vriesendorp; Rob A F De Lind Van Wijngaarden; Stuart J Head; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Graeme L Hickey; Vivek Rao; Neil J Weissman; Michael J Reardon; Michael G Moront; Joseph F Sabik; Robert J M Klautz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Early outcomes of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Serik Aitaliyev; Egle Rumbinaitė; Karolina Mėlinytė-Ankudavičė; Rokas Nekrošius; Vytenis Keturakis; Rimantas Benetis
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.581

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.