Literature DB >> 30657913

Evaluation of active dried yeast in the diets of feedlot steers-I: Effects on feeding performance traits, the composition of growth, and carcass characteristics1.

Whitney L Crossland1, Jillian T Jobe1, Flavio R B Ribeiro2, Jason E Sawyer1, Todd R Callaway3, Luis O Tedeschi1.   

Abstract

The use of active dried yeast (ADY) in the diets of feedlot steers may improve feed efficiency, growth performance, and reduce days on feed. Strategic timing of ADY inclusion in the diet may increase feed conversion or aid in the dietary transition from growing to finishing diets. One hundred twenty steers, blocked by weight, were fed four diets for 164 d: grower (70 d), first transition diet (7 d), second transition diet for (7 d), and finisher (80 d) in a GrowSafe System. Four treatment sequences of ADY inclusion were evaluated in a Balaam's design where steers were fed a control diet before and after the grower phase (CC), control before and ADY after the grower phase (CY), ADY before and control after the grower phase (YC), and ADY before and after the grower phase (YY). A random coefficients model was used to evaluate the following variables of interest: feeding performance and growth traits, including biometric measurements and carcass ultrasound measurements, and carcass characteristics. Treatment was a fixed effect and block was a random effect. Treatment did not affect feeding performance or behavior (P ≥ 0.14). The rate of change of biometric measurements were not different (P ≥ 0.16) across treatment groups except for rib girth circumference, which was greater for the YY and CY groups intermediate for the CC group and least for the YC group (0.828 and 0.809 vs. 0.751 vs. 0.666 cm/d, respectively; P < 0.01). Faster growth rates of rib girth circumference resulted in larger final measurements for steers that were finished on ADY (P < 0.01). Ultrasound measurements (backfat, LM area, intra-muscular fat, and rump fat) were not different across treatments (P ≥ 0.15). However, there was a tendency for the YC group to have a slower rate of back fat deposition than other treatment groups (P = 0.09). Steers' final shrunk BWs did not differ (P = 0.61), but shrink percentage was greater for CC than for YY groups (3.7% vs. 2.7%, respectively; P = 0.05). Carcass characteristics were not different across treatments (P ≥ 0.20). Crude fat, CP, ash and moisture analyses of the 9th to 11th rib section were not different across treatments, and there was no difference in adjusted final shrunk BW (P ≥ 0.45). Feeding the ADY strain used in this study to growing and finishing feedlot steers increased rib girth circumference development rate and reduced shrink loss without affecting feeding behavior, feeding performance, or carcass characteristics.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; development; feed additives; yeast

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30657913      PMCID: PMC6396235          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.

Authors:  C E Realini; R E Williams; T D Pringle; J K Bertrand
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Predicting individual feed requirements of cattle fed in groups.

Authors:  P J Guiroy; D G Fox; L O Tedeschi; M J Baker; M D Cravey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Technical note: Evaluation of bimodal distribution models to determine meal criterion in heifers fed a high-grain diet.

Authors:  J C Bailey; L O Tedeschi; E D M Mendes; J E Sawyer; G E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  A powerful test for Balaam's design.

Authors:  Joji Mori; Yutaka Kano
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 5.  On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.

Authors:  S C Chow; J P Liu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Using real-time ultrasound and carcass measurements to estimate total internal fat in beef cattle over different breed types and managements.

Authors:  F R B Ribeiro; L O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Determination of carcass and body fat compositions of grazing crossbred bulls using body measurements.

Authors:  H J Fernandes; L O Tedeschi; M F Paulino; L M Paiva
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Predicting carcass and body fat composition using biometric measurements of grazing beef cattle.

Authors:  N F De Paula; L O Tedeschi; M F Paulino; H J Fernandes; M A Fonseca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Validation of a system for monitoring feeding behavior in beef cattle.

Authors:  E D M Mendes; G E Carstens; L O Tedeschi; W E Pinchak; T H Friend
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants.

Authors:  M Desnoyers; S Giger-Reverdin; G Bertin; C Duvaux-Ponter; D Sauvant
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  2 in total

1.  The use of live yeast to increase intake and performance of cattle receiving low-quality tropical forages.

Authors:  Mariano C Parra; Diogo F A Costa; Andre S V Palma; Karine D V Camargo; Lais O Lima; Karen J Harper; Sarah J Meale; Luis F P Silva
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  The Impact of Heat Load on Cattle.

Authors:  Angela M Lees; Veerasamy Sejian; Andrea L Wallage; Cameron C Steel; Terry L Mader; Jarrod C Lees; John B Gaughan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.