Literature DB >> 19307644

Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants.

M Desnoyers1, S Giger-Reverdin, G Bertin, C Duvaux-Ponter, D Sauvant.   

Abstract

The effects of yeast supplementation on intake, production, and rumen fermentation characteristics have been widely studied, but results are inconsistent between different studies. A quantitative meta-analysis was applied to 110 papers, 157 experiments, and 376 treatments dealing with yeast supplementation in ruminants. The objective was first to highlight the major quantitative effects of live yeast supplementation on intake, rumen fermentation, and milk production, and second, to identify major differences in experimental conditions between studies that can affect the response to treatment. Some of these experimental conditions are referred to as interfering factors. Yeast supplementation increased rumen pH (+0.03 on average) and rumen volatile fatty acid concentration (+2.17 mM on average), tended to decrease rumen lactic acid concentration (-0.9 mM on average), and had no influence on acetate-to-propionate ratio. Total-tract organic matter digestibility was also increased by yeast supplementation (+0.8% on average). Yeast supplementation increased dry matter intake (DMI; +0.44 g/kg of body weight; BW), milk yield (+1.2 g/kg of BW), and tended to increase milk fat content (+0.05%), but had no influence on milk protein content. Dose effects of yeast supplementation, expressed as log(10) [1+(cfu per 100 kg of BW)], globally confirmed the qualitative effects observed in the first analysis. The positive effect of yeast supplementation on rumen pH increased with the percentage of concentrate in the diet and with the DMI level. It was negatively correlated with the level of dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF). The positive effect of yeast supplementation on rumen volatile fatty acid concentration increased with DMI and crude protein levels. The positive effect of yeast supplementation on organic matter digestibility increased with the percentage of concentrate and NDF in the diet. The negative effect of yeast supplementation on lactic acid concentration tended to decrease when the DMI level and the percentage of concentrate in the diet increased. The effects of interfering factors were globally similar when either dose effect or qualitative effect of yeast was taken into account. Although rumen fermentation efficiency per se was not measured, these results suggest an improvement in rumen fermentation by yeast supplementation. This effect could, however, be modulated by several different factors such as DMI, percentage of concentrate or NDF in the diet, or species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307644     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  38 in total

1.  Effect of live yeast supplementation to gestating sows and nursery piglets on postweaning growth performance and nutrient digestibility.

Authors:  Hang Lu; Pete Wilcock; Olayiwola Adeola; Kolapo M Ajuwon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Evaluation of active dried yeast in the diets of feedlot steers-I: Effects on feeding performance traits, the composition of growth, and carcass characteristics1.

Authors:  Whitney L Crossland; Jillian T Jobe; Flavio R B Ribeiro; Jason E Sawyer; Todd R Callaway; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of supplemental yeast culture and physiological factors on colostrum and milk composition of Pelibuey ewes.

Authors:  Rafael Julio Macedo; Victalina Arredondo; Fernando García; Miguel Aguilar; Omar Prado; Rosario Rodríguez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Effects of active dry yeast on ruminal pH characteristics and energy partitioning of finishing steers under thermoneutral or heat-stressed environment.

Authors:  Whitney Lynn Crossland; Aaron Bradley Norris; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi; Todd Ryan Callaway
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evaluation of active dried yeast in the diets of feedlot steers. II. Effects on rumen pH and liver health of feedlot steers1.

Authors:  Whitney Lynn Crossland; Caitlyn M Cagle; Jason E Sawyer; Todd R Callaway; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Supplementation with live yeast increases rate and extent of in vitro fermentation of nondigested feed ingredients by fecal microbiota.

Authors:  Tadele K Kiros; Atta Kofi Agyekum; Jing Wang; Romain D'Inca; Denise A Beaulieu; Eric Auclair; Andrew G Van Kessel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of a live yeast in natural-program finishing feedlot diets on growth performance, digestibility, carcass characteristics, and feeding behavior.

Authors:  Lauren A Ovinge; Jhones O Sarturi; Micheal L Galyean; Micheal A Ballou; Sara J Trojan; Pedro R B Campanili; Abdullah A Alrumaih; Lucas A Pellarin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield in Nili-Ravi buffaloes.

Authors:  M I Anjum; S Javaid; M S Ansar; A Ghaffar
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.376

9.  Evaluation of different inclusion levels of dry live yeast impacts on various rumen parameters and in situ digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber in growing and finishing beef cattle.

Authors:  Caitlyn M Cagle; Luiz Fernando D Batista; Robin C Anderson; Mozart A Fonseca; Maztt D Cravey; Christine Julien; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  The use of live yeast to increase intake and performance of cattle receiving low-quality tropical forages.

Authors:  Mariano C Parra; Diogo F A Costa; Andre S V Palma; Karine D V Camargo; Lais O Lima; Karen J Harper; Sarah J Meale; Luis F P Silva
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.