Literature DB >> 30657396

Linking Reminders and Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Results From a National Survey.

Elizabeth J Siembida1, Archana Radhakrishnan1, Sarah A Nowak1, Andrew M Parker1, Craig Evan Pollack1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physician reminders have successfully increased rates of mammography. However, considering recent changes to breast cancer screening guidelines that disagree on the optimal age to start and stop mammography screening, we sought to examine the extent to which reminders have been deployed for breast cancer screening targeting younger and older patients.
METHODS: A mailed survey was sent to a national sample of 2,000 primary care physicians between May and September 2016. Physicians were asked whether they received reminders to screen women in various age groups (40 to 44, 45 to 49, and ≥ 75 years), the organizational screening guidelines they trusted most, and whether they recommended routine breast cancer screening to average-risk women in the different age groups. Using regression models, we assessed the association between reminders and physician screening recommendations, controlling for physician and practice characteristics, and evaluated whether the association varied by the guidelines they trusted.
RESULTS: A total of 871 physicians responded (adjusted response rate, 52.3%). Overall, 28.9% of physicians reported receiving reminders for patient ages 40 to 44 years, 32.5% for patient ages 45 to 49 years, and 16.5% for patient ages ≥ 75 years. Receiving reminders significantly increased the likelihood of physicians recommending mammography screening. In adjusted analyses, 84% (95% CI, 77% to 90%) of physicians who received reminders recommended screening for women ages ≥ 75 versus 65% (95% CI, 62% to 69%) of those who did not receive reminders. The associations between reminders and screening recommendations remained consistent regardless of which guidelines physicians reported trusting.
CONCLUSION: Reminders were significantly associated with increases in physician screening recommendations for mammography, underscoring the need for careful implementation in scenarios where guidelines are discordant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30657396      PMCID: PMC6873794          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.17.00090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  19 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  S Shea; W DuMouchel; L Bahamonde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care.

Authors:  Sylvia M Burwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Changing Provider Behavior in the Context of Chronic Disease Management: Focus on Clinical Inertia.

Authors:  Kim L Lavoie; Joshua A Rash; Tavis S Campbell
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Corbelli; Sonya Borrero; Rachel Bonnema; Megan McNamara; Kevin Kraemer; Doris Rubio; Irina Karpov; Melissa McNeil
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

5.  Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians.

Authors:  Celia Patricia Kaplan; Jennifer S Haas; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Genevieve Des Jarlais; Steven E Gregorich
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Following Guideline Changes: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Kala Visvanathan; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: primary care physicians in the United States.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K Han; Vicki B Benard; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K J Han; Craig C Earle; Tenbroeck Smith; John Z Ayanian; Richard Lee; Anita Ambs; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 9.  Clinical decision support: effectiveness in improving quality processes and clinical outcomes and factors that may influence success.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Murphy
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-06-06

Review 10.  Factors associated with clinical inertia: an integrative review.

Authors:  Isabelle Aujoulat; Patricia Jacquemin; Ernst Rietzschel; André Scheen; Patrick Tréfois; Johan Wens; Elisabeth Darras; Michel P Hermans
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-05-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Using an Agent-based Model to Examine Deimplementation of Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Archana Radhakrishnan; Nancy Schoenborn; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Physicians' characteristics and practices associated with the provision of cancer screening advice to their patients: the Spanish SUN cohort study.

Authors:  Carmen Sayon-Orea; Silvia Carlos; Anaïs Rico-Campà; Alejandro Fernández-Montero; Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga; Estefanía Toledo; Stefanos Kales; Miguel Angel Martínez-González
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.