Literature DB >> 30656555

Cytokinin-induced parthenocarpy of San Pedro type fig (Ficus carica L.) main crop: explained by phytohormone assay and transcriptomic network comparison.

Peng Chai1, Sujuan Dong1, Lijuan Chai1, Shangwu Chen2, Moshe Flaishman3, Huiqin Ma4.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: CPPU-induced San Pedro type fig main crop parthenocarpy exhibited constantly increasing IAA content and more significantly enriched KEGG pathways in the receptacle than in female flowers. N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N-phenylurea (CPPU) was applied to San Pedro fig (Ficus carica L.) main crop to induce parthenocarpy; the optimal effect was obtained with 25 mg L-1 application to syconia when female flowers were at anthesis. To elucidate the key expression changes in parthenocarpy conversion, significant changes in phytohormone level and transcriptome of fig female flowers and receptacles were monitored. HPLC-MS revealed increased IAA content in female flowers and receptacle 2, 4 and 10 days after treatment (DAT), decreased zeatin level in the receptacle 2, 4 and 10 DAT, decreased GA3 content 2 and 4 DAT, and increased GA3 content 10 DAT. ABA level increased 2 and 4 DAT, and decreased 10 DAT. CPPU-treated syconia released more ethylene than the control except 2 DAT. RNA-Seq and bioinformatics analysis revealed notably more differentially expressed KEGG pathways in the receptacle than in female flowers. In the phytohormone gene network, GA-biosynthesis genes GA20ox and GA3ox were upregulated, along with GA signal-transduction genes GID1 and GID2, and IAA-signaling genes AUX/IAA and GH3. ABA-biosynthesis gene NCED and signaling genes PP2C and ABF were downregulated 10 DAT. One ACO gene showed consistent upregulation in both female flowers and receptacle after CPPU treatment, and more than a dozen of ERFs demonstrated opposing changes in expression. Our results revealed early-stage spatiotemporal phytohormone and transcriptomic responses in CPPU-induced San Pedro fig main crop parthenocarpy, which could be valuable for further understanding the nature of the parthenocarpy of different fig types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokinin treatment; Fig (Ficus carica L.); Parthenocarpy; Phytohormone; San Pedro fig; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30656555     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-019-00820-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  41 in total

Review 1.  How to be a fig wasp.

Authors:  George D Weiblen
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity.

Authors:  Tomás Werner; Václav Motyka; Valérie Laucou; Rafaël Smets; Harry Van Onckelen; Thomas Schmülling
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 4.  Parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato.

Authors:  B Gorguet; A W van Heusden; P Lindhout
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.081

Review 5.  Osmotic signaling in plants: multiple pathways mediated by emerging kinase families.

Authors:  Marie Boudsocq; Christiane Laurière
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  GASA4, one of the 14-member Arabidopsis GASA family of small polypeptides, regulates flowering and seed development.

Authors:  Ingrid Roxrud; Stein Erik Lid; Jennifer C Fletcher; Ed D L Schmidt; Hilde-Gunn Opsahl-Sorteberg
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  Cross talk between gibberellin and cytokinin: the Arabidopsis GA response inhibitor SPINDLY plays a positive role in cytokinin signaling.

Authors:  Yaarit Greenboim-Wainberg; Inbar Maymon; Roy Borochov; John Alvarez; Neil Olszewski; Naomi Ori; Yuval Eshed; David Weiss
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Genetic analysis of growth-regulator-induced parthenocarpy in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  A Vivian-Smith; A M Koltunow
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Expression of CycD3 is transiently increased by pollination and N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N'-phenylurea in ovaries of Lagenaria leucantha.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jing-Quan Yu; Qing-Jing Ye; Zhu-Jun Zhu; Ze-Jian Guo
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development.

Authors:  Karen E Reid; Niclas Olsson; James Schlosser; Fred Peng; Steven T Lund
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hormonal interactions underlying parthenocarpic fruit formation in horticultural crops.

Authors:  Rahat Sharif; Li Su; Xuehao Chen; Xiaohua Qi
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 2.  Applications of Cytokinins in Horticultural Fruit Crops: Trends and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Adeyemi O Aremu; Olaniyi A Fawole; Nokwanda P Makunga; Nqobile A Masondo; Mack Moyo; Nana M D Buthelezi; Stephen O Amoo; Lukáš Spíchal; Karel Doležal
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-08-22

3.  Ethephon induces coordinated ripening acceleration and divergent coloration responses in fig (Ficus carica L.) flowers and receptacles.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Cui; Yanlei Zhai; Moshe Flaishman; Jinping Li; Shangwu Chen; Chuanlin Zheng; Huiqin Ma
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Cross-talk between the cytokinin, auxin, and gibberellin regulatory networks in determining parthenocarpy in cucumber.

Authors:  Neha Kumari Mandal; Khushboo Kumari; Aditi Kundu; Ajay Arora; Prolay K Bhowmick; Mir Asif Iquebal; Sarika Jaiswal; Tusar Kanti Behera; A D Munshi; Shyam S Dey
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.