Nicole Hobbs1, Iman Hajizadeh2, Mudassir Rashid2, Kamuran Turksoy1, Marc Breton3, Ali Cinar1,2. 1. 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. 3 Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity presents a significant challenge for glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes. As accurate glycemic predictions are key to successful automated decision-making systems (eg, artificial pancreas, AP), the inclusion of additional physiological variables in the estimation of the metabolic state may improve the glucose prediction accuracy during exercise. METHODS: Predictor-based subspace identification is applied to a dynamic glucose prediction model including heart rate measurements along with variables representing the carbohydrate consumption and insulin boluses. To demonstrate the improvement in prediction ability due to the additional heart rate variable, the performance of the proposed modeling technique is evaluated with (SID-HR) and without heart rate (SID-2) as an additional input using experimental data involving adolescents at ski camp. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed approach is compared to that of the metabolic state observer (MSO) model currently used in the University of Virginia AP algorithm. RESULTS: The addition of heart rate in the subspace-based model (SID-HR) yields a statistically significant improvement in the root-mean-square error compared to the SID-2 model (P < .001) and the standard MSO (P < .001). Furthermore, the SID-HR model performed favorably in comparison to the SID-2 and MSO models after accounting for its increased complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Directly considering the effects of physical activity levels on glycemic dynamics through the inclusion of heart rate as an additional input variable in the glucose dynamics model improves the glucose prediction accuracy. The proposed methodology could improve exercise-informed model-based predictive control algorithms in artificial pancreas systems.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity presents a significant challenge for glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes. As accurate glycemic predictions are key to successful automated decision-making systems (eg, artificial pancreas, AP), the inclusion of additional physiological variables in the estimation of the metabolic state may improve the glucose prediction accuracy during exercise. METHODS: Predictor-based subspace identification is applied to a dynamic glucose prediction model including heart rate measurements along with variables representing the carbohydrate consumption and insulin boluses. To demonstrate the improvement in prediction ability due to the additional heart rate variable, the performance of the proposed modeling technique is evaluated with (SID-HR) and without heart rate (SID-2) as an additional input using experimental data involving adolescents at ski camp. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed approach is compared to that of the metabolic state observer (MSO) model currently used in the University of Virginia AP algorithm. RESULTS: The addition of heart rate in the subspace-based model (SID-HR) yields a statistically significant improvement in the root-mean-square error compared to the SID-2 model (P < .001) and the standard MSO (P < .001). Furthermore, the SID-HR model performed favorably in comparison to the SID-2 and MSO models after accounting for its increased complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Directly considering the effects of physical activity levels on glycemic dynamics through the inclusion of heart rate as an additional input variable in the glucose dynamics model improves the glucose prediction accuracy. The proposed methodology could improve exercise-informed model-based predictive control algorithms in artificial pancreas systems.
Authors: Kenneth Robertson; Peter Adolfsson; Gary Scheiner; Ragnar Hanas; Michael C Riddell Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Marc Breton; Anne Farret; Daniela Bruttomesso; Stacey Anderson; Lalo Magni; Stephen Patek; Chiara Dalla Man; Jerome Place; Susan Demartini; Simone Del Favero; Chiara Toffanin; Colleen Hughes-Karvetski; Eyal Dassau; Howard Zisser; Francis J Doyle; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Angelo Avogaro; Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Boris Kovatchev Journal: Diabetes Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Arianne C Van Bon; Lisanne D Jonker; Rob Koebrugge; Robin Koops; Joost B L Hoekstra; J Hans DeVries Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2012-09-01
Authors: Helen R Murphy; Kavita Kumareswaran; Daniela Elleri; Janet M Allen; Karen Caldwell; Martina Biagioni; David Simmons; David B Dunger; Marianna Nodale; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Stephanie A Amiel; Roman Hovorka Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Steven J Russell; Firas H El-Khatib; David M Nathan; Kendra L Magyar; John Jiang; Edward R Damiano Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Daniela Elleri; Janet M Allen; Kavita Kumareswaran; Lalantha Leelarathna; Marianna Nodale; Karen Caldwell; Peiyao Cheng; Craig Kollman; Ahmad Haidar; Helen R Murphy; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Carlo L Acerini; David B Dunger; Roman Hovorka Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Xiaoyu Sun; Mudassir Rashid; Nicole Hobbs; Mohammad Reza Askari; Rachel Brandt; Andrew Shahidehpour; Ali Cinar Journal: Control Eng Pract Date: 2021-09-11 Impact factor: 4.057
Authors: Elena Daskalaki; Anne Parkinson; Nicola Brew-Sam; Md Zakir Hossain; David O'Neal; Christopher J Nolan; Hanna Suominen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Omar Diouri; Monika Cigler; Martina Vettoretti; Julia K Mader; Pratik Choudhary; Eric Renard Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.876