BACKGROUND: Among adults with diabetes, 19-34% will develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), which increases amputation risk and health care costs, and worsens quality of life. Regular physical activity, when increased gradually, may help prevent DFUs. In this mixed-methods study, we examined the feasibility of a low-intensity, technology-based behavioral intervention to increase activity in adults at risk for DFUs. METHOD:Participants at risk for a DFU (n = 12; 66% female; mean age = 59.9 years) received four in-person exercise and behavioral counseling sessions over 2-3 weeks, supplemented with use of an activity monitor (to track steps) and text messages (to reinforce behavioral strategies) for an added 8 weeks. Pre- and postintervention assessments of accelerometer measured activity, daily mobility, and glycemic control (A1C) were completed. Treatment acceptability was assessed by questionnaire and via key informant interview. RESULTS: The program appears feasible since all but one participant attended all four sessions, all used the activity monitor and all responded to text messages. Treatment acceptability (scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = extremely satisfied) was high; average item ratings were 4.79 (SD = 0.24). Participants increased their steps by an average of 881.89 steps/day (d = 0.66). A1C decreased on average by 0.33% (d = 0.23). Daily mobility did not change. Interview results suggest that participants perceived benefits from the intervention. Participant recommended improvements included providing more physical activity information, addressing pain, and intervention delivery in a podiatry clinic. CONCLUSION: Individuals at risk for a DFU might benefit from a minimally intensive, technology-based intervention to increase their physical activity. Future research comparing the intervention to usual care is warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Among adults with diabetes, 19-34% will develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), which increases amputation risk and health care costs, and worsens quality of life. Regular physical activity, when increased gradually, may help prevent DFUs. In this mixed-methods study, we examined the feasibility of a low-intensity, technology-based behavioral intervention to increase activity in adults at risk for DFUs. METHOD:Participants at risk for a DFU (n = 12; 66% female; mean age = 59.9 years) received four in-person exercise and behavioral counseling sessions over 2-3 weeks, supplemented with use of an activity monitor (to track steps) and text messages (to reinforce behavioral strategies) for an added 8 weeks. Pre- and postintervention assessments of accelerometer measured activity, daily mobility, and glycemic control (A1C) were completed. Treatment acceptability was assessed by questionnaire and via key informant interview. RESULTS: The program appears feasible since all but one participant attended all four sessions, all used the activity monitor and all responded to text messages. Treatment acceptability (scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = extremely satisfied) was high; average item ratings were 4.79 (SD = 0.24). Participants increased their steps by an average of 881.89 steps/day (d = 0.66). A1C decreased on average by 0.33% (d = 0.23). Daily mobility did not change. Interview results suggest that participants perceived benefits from the intervention. Participant recommended improvements included providing more physical activity information, addressing pain, and intervention delivery in a podiatry clinic. CONCLUSION: Individuals at risk for a DFU might benefit from a minimally intensive, technology-based intervention to increase their physical activity. Future research comparing the intervention to usual care is warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral intervention; diabetes; exercise; health promotion; mHealth
Authors: D G Armstrong; S K Hussain; J Middleton; E J Peters; R P Wunderlich; L A Lavery Journal: Ostomy Wound Manage Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Afsaneh Alavi; R Gary Sibbald; Dieter Mayer; Laurie Goodman; Mariam Botros; David G Armstrong; Kevin Woo; Thomas Boeni; Elizabeth A Ayello; Robert S Kirsner Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Gang Liu; Yanping Li; Yang Hu; Geng Zong; Shanshan Li; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; JoAnn E Manson; Kathryn M Rexrode; Hyun Joon Shin; Qi Sun Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lawrence A Lavery; Kevin R Higgins; Dan R Lanctot; George P Constantinides; Ruben G Zamorano; David G Armstrong; Kyriacos A Athanasiou; C Mauli Agrawal Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Bradford Rice; Urvi Desai; Alice Kate G Cummings; Howard G Birnbaum; Michelle Skornicki; Nathan B Parsons Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kamel Mohammedi; Mark Woodward; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Sophia Zoungas; Stephen Colagiuri; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Neil Poulter; David R Matthews; Michel Marre; John Chalmers Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 9.951