| Literature DB >> 30651851 |
Mo Zhu1, Guangyu Hao1, Jianming Xing1, Su Hu1, Dechun Geng2, Wen Zhang2, Qianqian Wang1, Chunhong Hu1, Ximing Wang1.
Abstract
Association of <span class="Disease">bone marrow adipose and microstructure wi<span class="Chemical">th bone strength in osteoporotic rats using MR Dixon analysis and micro-CT was evaluated. A total of 40 female Sprague-Dawley rats (6-month-old) were divided randomly into sham-operated (SHAM, n=20) group and ovariectomized (OVX, n=20) group. Fat fraction (FF) was measured by two-point Dixon method with MR imaging at the baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th week, respectively. After sacrifice by anesthesia, the fifth lumbar vertebrae bone was sampled for micro-CT scanning. The biomechanical analysis was also performed. FF in osteoporotic rats significantly increases with time, which correlates with bone microstructure parameters. Compared with biomechanical test, FF showed negative correlation with break stress and elastic modulus. It also suggested that loss of bone mass was accompanied with the increase of adipose tissue content in vertebrae bone marrow. The impairment of bone strength leads to the risk of brittle fracture. In conclusion, the bone marrow adipose amount obtained by MR Dixon and microstructure by micro-CT correlates to bone strength in osteoporotic rats.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanical analysis; micro-CT; osteoporosis; two-point Dixon
Year: 2018 PMID: 30651851 PMCID: PMC6307407 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.7003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Based on the two-point Dixon water-fat separation, vertebral bone marrow adipose tissue was analyzed in osteoporotic rats. The relevant materials and instruments are listed.
| Materials and instruments | Vendors |
|---|---|
| Micro-CT Skyscan1176 | Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium |
| CT analyzer1.10 | Skyscan |
| Mimics10.01 | Skyscan |
| Magnetom Skyra 3T | Siemens AG, Munich, Germany |
| HY-1080 | Hengyi Precision Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China |
| PFA | Wuxi Zhanwang Chemical Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China |
Figure 1.Images of two-point TSE-Dixon MRI of group OVX. (A-D) The TSE-Dixon image of the synchronized phase, the opposite phase, the lipid phase and the aqueous phase. (E-F) The schematic diagram of ROI FF by combining the DIV image (E) and water phase image (F). FF, fat fraction; ROI, region of interest.
Time-course profiling of FF and bone morphology.
| Items | Groups | Week 0 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF, % | SHAM | 17.9±2.3 | 18.1±1.9 | 18.6±1.5 | 20.3±1.7 | 1.739 | 0.199 |
| OVX | 17.8±1.4 | 21.5±1.8[ | 25.3±1.6[ | 28.9±1.7[ | 42.466 | <0.001 | |
| BVF, % | SHAM | 56.43±2.22 | 56.35±2.64 | 55.12±3.65 | 53.49±3.28 | 1.050 | 0.397 |
| OVX | 55.57±2.87 | 48.93±3.47[ | 39.42±3.32[ | 31.41±2.98[ | 55.903 | <0.001 | |
| Tb.N, mm−1 | SHAM | 4.82±0.33 | 4.71±0.27 | 4.65±0.29 | 4.56±0.37 | 0.604 | 0.622 |
| OVX | 4.78±0.26 | 4.67±0.31 | 4.73±0.27 | 4.51±0.36 | 0.789 | 0.517 | |
| Tb.Th, µm | SHAM | 119.73±9.99 | 119.62±10.12 | 118.24±13.50 | 117.50±13.98 | 0.041 | 0.989 |
| OVX | 120.10±12.83 | 113.38±10.53 | 107.32±12.10 | 96.45±11.21[ | 3.683 | 0.034 | |
| Tb.Sp, mm | SHAM | 92.53±14.73 | 93.12±10.08 | 93.08±8.85 | 95.12±8.14 | 0.056 | 0.982 |
| OVX | 91.39±13.10 | 117.92±8.41[ | 133.41±14.90[ | 159.47±10.75[ | 28.015 | <0.001 | |
| SMI | SHAM | 0.59±0.08 | 0.61±0.16 | 0.65±0.12 | 0.67±0.15 | 0.367 | 0.778 |
| OVX | 0.53±0.09 | 0.74±0.13[ | 1.09±0.19[ | 1.42±0.17[ | 34.150 | <0.001 |
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 0
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 4
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 8
P<0.05, statistical difference between the OVX group and the SHAM group; FF, fat fraction.
Figure 2.Three-dimensional reconstruction of vertebral bone through micro-CT for OVX group rats. (A-D) Represents the morphological reconstruction of vertebral bone at baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks in OVX group rats. After 12 weeks, the trabecular gaps significantly expanded, trabecular fracture and perforation was also remarkably increased.
Time-course profiling of biomechanical characteristics after ovariectomized treatment.
| Items | Groups | Week 0 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Break load, N | SHAM | 215.3±26.8 | 207.3±29.3 | 201.8±31.1 | 194.7±32.8 | 0.419 | 0.742 |
| OVX | 209.7±26.2 | 182.3±28.4 | 150.3±33.0[ | 110.3±45.3[ | 7.899 | 0.002 | |
| Break stress, MPa | SHAM | 23.3±2.9 | 22.3±3.8 | 21.6±3.6 | 20.8±3.5 | 0.465 | 0.711 |
| OVX | 22.6±2.5 | 19.7±3.0 | 16.1±2.5[ | 11.9±3.2[ | 13.760 | <0.001 | |
| Elastic modulus, MPa | SHAM | 476.2±25.1 | 480.8±39.3 | 532.4±29.8[ | 551.3±30.0[ | 7.076 | 0.003 |
| OVX | 482.4±25.7 | 364.8±45.6[ | 291.4±35.0[ | 263.9±43.2[ | 32.771 | <0.001 |
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 0
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 4
P<0.05, statistical difference compared to week 8
P<0.05, statistical difference between the OVX group and the SHAM group.
Figure 3.HE staining of OVX group. (A-D) The baseline, the 4th week, the 8th week and the 12th week HE image (HE; magnification, ×200).