Literature DB >> 30650421

Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.

Thomas Zahnert1, Robert Mlynski2,3, Hubert Löwenheim4, Dirk Beutner5, Rudolf Hagen2, Arneborg Ernst6, Thorsten Zehlicke3, Hilke Kühne7, Natascha Friese4, Anke Tropitzsch4, Jan Christoffer Luers5, Ingo Todt6, Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and performance of four different vibroplasty couplers (round window, oval window, CliP and Bell coupler) in combination with an active middle ear implant.
METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, long-term study including 5 German hospitals. Thirty adult subjects suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss were initially enrolled for the study, 24 of these were included in the final analysis with up to 36 months of postsurgical follow-up data. Bone conduction and air conduction were measured pre- and postoperatively to evalu ate safety. Postoperative aided sound field thresholds and Freiburger monosyllable word recognition scores were compared to unaided pre-implantation results to confirm performance. Additional speech tests compared postoperative unaided with aided results. To determine patient satisfaction, an established quality-of-life questionnaire developed for conventional hearing aid usage was administered to all subjects.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative bone conduction thresholds remained stable throughout the whole study period. Mean functional gain for all couplers investigated was 38.5 ± 11.4 dB HL (12 months) and 38.8 ± 12.5 dB HL (36 months). Mean word recognition scores at 65 dB SPL increased from 2.9% in the unaided by 64.2% to 67.1% in the aided situation. The mean postoperative speech reception in quiet (or 50% understanding of words in sentences) shows a speech intelligibility improvement at 36 months of 17.8 ± 12.4 dB SPL over the unaided condition. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improved by 5.9 ± 7.2 dB SNR over the unaided condition. High subjective device satisfaction was reflected by the International Inventory for Hearing Aids scored very positively.
CONCLUSION: A significant improvement was seen with all couplers, and audiological performance did not significantly differ between 12 and 36 months after surgery.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conductive hearing loss; Couplers; Middle ear implant; Mixed hearing loss; Vibrant Soundbridge; Vibroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30650421     DOI: 10.1159/000495560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.

Authors:  Nicole Knölke; Dawid Murawski; Nina Wardenga; Susan Busch; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-28

3.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Subjective Sound Quality Detection (HISQUI) over Time after Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation.

Authors:  Christof Buhl; Valeria Schindler; Flurin Pfiffner; Dorothe Veraguth; Alexander Huber; Christof Röösli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Mapping the ChOLE classification to hearing outcomes and disease-specific health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Nora M Weiss; David Bächinger; Adrian Rrahmani; Hans E Bernd; Alexander Huber; Robert Mlynski; Christof Röösli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Results of Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study (the ROMEO Study).

Authors:  Chan Il Song; Hyong-Ho Cho; Byung Yoon Choi; Jae Young Choi; Jin Woong Choi; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jong Woo Chung; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong; Yehree Kim; Byung Don Lee; Il-Woo Lee; Jong Dae Lee; Jun Ho Lee; Kyu-Yup Lee; Il Joon Moon; In Seok Moon; Seung-Ha Oh; Hong Ju Park; Shi Nae Park; Ji Won Seo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.