Literature DB >> 30649875

In Vitro and In Silico Evaluations of Binding Affinities of Perfluoroalkyl Substances to Baikal Seal and Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α.

Hiroshi Ishibashi1,2, Masashi Hirano3, Eun-Young Kim4, Hisato Iwata1.   

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the binding affinities of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs), to the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of Baikal seal ( Pusa sibirica; bs) and human (h) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). An in vitro competitive binding assay showed that six PFCAs and two PFSAs could bind to recombinant bs and hPPARα LBD proteins in a dose-dependent manner. The relative binding affinities (RBAs) of PFASs to bsPPARα were as follows: PFOS > PFDA > PFNA > PFUnDA > PFOA > PFHxS > PFHpA > PFHxA. The RBAs to bsPPARα showed a significant positive correlation with those to hPPARα. In silico PPARα homology modeling predicted that there were two ligand-binding pockets (LBPs) in the bsPPARα and hPPARα LBDs. Structure-activity relationship analyses suggested that the binding potencies of PFASs to PPARα might depend on LBP binding cavity volume, hydrogen bond interactions, the number of perfluorinated carbons, and the hydrophobicity of PFASs. Interspecies comparison of the in vitro binding affinities revealed that bsPPARα had higher preference for PFASs with long carbon chains than hPPARα. The in silico docking simulations suggested that the first LBP of bsPPARα had higher affinities than that of hPPARα; however, the second LBP of bsPPARα had lower affinities than that of hPPARα. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence showing interspecies differences in the binding of PFASs to PPARαs and their structure-activity relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30649875     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

Review 1.  Association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances exposure and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si-Yu Gui; Jian-Chao Qiao; Ke-Xin Xu; Ze-Lian Li; Yue-Nan Chen; Ke-Jia Wu; Zheng-Xuan Jiang; Cheng-Yang Hu
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.371

2.  Nontarget Screening of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Binding to Human Liver Fatty Acid Binding Protein.

Authors:  Diwen Yang; Jiajun Han; David Ross Hall; Jianxian Sun; Jesse Fu; Steven Kutarna; Keith A Houck; Carlie A LaLone; Jon A Doering; Carla A Ng; Hui Peng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Perfluoroalkyl Acid Binding with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors α, γ, and δ, and Fatty Acid Binding Proteins by Equilibrium Dialysis with a Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Manoochehr Khazaee; Emerson Christie; Weixiao Cheng; Mandy Michalsen; Jennifer Field; Carla Ng
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Replacement per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are potent modulators of lipogenic and drug metabolizing gene expression signatures in primary human hepatocytes.

Authors:  Emily Marques; Marisa Pfohl; Wei Wei; Giuseppe Tarantola; Lucie Ford; Ogochukwu Amaeze; Jessica Alesio; Sangwoo Ryu; Xuelian Jia; Hao Zhu; Geoffrey D Bothun; Angela Slitt
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Quantitative Chemical Proteomics Reveals Interspecies Variations on Binding Schemes of L-FABP with Perfluorooctanesulfonate.

Authors:  Jiajun Han; Jesse Fu; Jianxian Sun; David Ross Hall; Diwen Yang; Donovan Blatz; Keith Houck; Carla Ng; Jon Doering; Carlie LaLone; Hui Peng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 11.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.