Literature DB >> 30649308

Caregiving Intensity and Mortality in Older Women, Accounting for Time-Varying and Lagged Caregiver Status: The Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Study.

Lisa Fredman1, Lynsie R Ranker1, Lee Strunin2, Meghan L Smith1, Katie M Applebaum3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Caregiving is associated with reduced mortality in recent studies. Investigations of caregiving intensity may reveal an underlying mechanism. However, studies of caregiving intensity and mortality have mixed results, perhaps due to imprecise measurement of caregiving intensity, not accounting for healthier persons likely having greater caregiving involvement, or temporal changes in intensity. We examined the relationship between caregiving intensity (based on tasks performed) and mortality, treating intensity and health status as time-varying, and lagging exposure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Caregiving tasks among 1,069 women in the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures study (35% caregivers) were assessed at 5 interviews conducted between 1999 and 2009. Caregivers were categorized as high intensity if they assisted a person with dressing, transferring, bathing, or toileting; or as low intensity if they assisted with other instrumental or basic activities of daily living (I/ADLs). Alternatively, high intensity was defined as assisting with more than the median number of I/ADL tasks (median-based measure). Mortality was assessed through 2011. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals based on concurrent intensity, and lagging exposure 2 years.
RESULTS: High-intensity caregivers had significantly lower mortality using the median-based measure after lagging exposure (aHR = 0.55, 0.34-0.89). Similar, but not statistically significant associations were observed in non-lagged analyses (aHR = 0.54, 0.29-1.04) and task-specific intensity (aHRs were 0.61 and 0.51). Low-intensity caregivers had similar mortality rates to noncaregivers in all analyses. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Among older women, high-intensity caregivers had lower mortality rates than noncaregivers. Whether this association extends to other populations merits investigation.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADL limitations; IADL; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30649308      PMCID: PMC6857683          DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  32 in total

Review 1.  Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Silvia Sörensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-06

2.  Feelings of Usefulness to Others, Disability, and Mortality in Older Adults: the MacArthur Study of Successful Aging.

Authors:  Tara L Gruenewald; Arun S Karlamangla; Gail A Greendale; Burton H Singer; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Caregiving frequency and physical function: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Andrea L Rosso; Brian K Lee; Marcia L Stefanick; Candyce H Kroenke; Laura H Coker; Nancy F Woods; Yvonne L Michael
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Predictors of caregiver burden in caregivers of individuals with dementia.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Mido Chang; Karen Rose; Sunha Kim
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The Effect of Transitions in Caregiving Status and Intensity on Perceived Stress Among 992 Female Caregivers and Noncaregivers.

Authors:  Jennifer G Lyons; Jane A Cauley; Lisa Fredman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 6.  The evolving concept of the healthy worker survivor effect.

Authors:  H M Arrighi; I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

8.  Is caring associated with an increased risk of mortality? A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Dermot O'Reilly; Sheelah Connolly; Michael Rosato; Chris Patterson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Caregiving intensity and change in physical functioning over a 2-year period: results of the caregiver-study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Lisa Fredman; Gheorghe Doros; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Susan K Ewing; Brent C Taylor; Howard A Fink; Katie L Stone; Jane A Cauley; J Kathleen Tracy; Marc C Hochberg; Nicolas Rodondi; Peggy M Cawthon
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  The transition to family caregiving and its effect on biomarkers of inflammation.

Authors:  David L Roth; William E Haley; Orla C Sheehan; Jin Huang; J David Rhodes; Peter Durda; Virginia J Howard; Jeremy D Walston; Mary Cushman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Take a sad song and make it better: Spousal activity limitations, caregiving, and depressive symptoms among couples.

Authors:  Sae Hwang Han; Kyungmin Kim; Jeffrey A Burr
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.