Literature DB >> 30647149

Neurons in FEF Keep Track of Items That Have Been Previously Fixated in Free Viewing Visual Search.

Koorosh Mirpour1, Zeinab Bolandnazar2, James W Bisley2,3,4.   

Abstract

When searching a visual scene for a target, we tend not to look at items or locations we have already searched. It is thought that this behavior is driven by an inhibitory tagging mechanism that inhibits responses on priority maps to the relevant items. We hypothesized that this inhibitory tagging signal should be represented as an elevated response in neurons that keep track of stimuli that have been fixated. We recorded from 231 neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) of 2 male animals performing a visual foraging task, in which they had to find a reward linked to one of five identical targets (Ts) among five distractors. We identified 38 neurons with activity that was significantly greater when the stimulus in the receptive field had been fixated previously in the trial than when it had not been fixated. The response to a fixated object began before the saccade ended, suggesting that this information is remapped. Unlike most FEF neurons, the activity in these cells was not suppressed during active fixation, had minimal motor responses, and did not change through the trial. Yet using traditional classifications from a memory-guided saccade, they were indistinguishable from the rest of the FEF population. We propose that these neurons keep track of any items that have been fixated within the trial and this signal is propagated by remapping. These neurons could be the source of the inhibitory tagging signal to parietal cortex, where a neuronal instantiation of inhibitory tagging is seen.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When we search a scene for an item, we rarely examine the same location twice. It is thought that this is due to a neural mechanism that keeps track of the items at which we have looked. Here we identified a subset of neurons in the frontal eye field that preferentially responded to items that had been fixated earlier in the trial. These responses were remapped, appearing before the saccade even ended, and were not suppressed during maintained fixation. We propose that these neurons keep track of which items have been examined in search and could be the source of feedback that creates the inhibitory tagging seen in parietal cortex.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/392114-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye movement; frontal eye field; inhibition of return; inhibitory tagging; putative tracking neurons; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30647149      PMCID: PMC6507089          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  38 in total

1.  Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Sommer; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Prefrontal neurons coding suppression of specific saccades.

Authors:  Ryohei P Hasegawa; Barry W Peterson; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Role of the rostral superior colliculus in active visual fixation and execution of express saccades.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanism of priming in visual search.

Authors:  Jacob A Westerberg; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Ketamine-Induced Alteration of Working Memory Utility during Oculomotor Foraging Task in Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryo Sawagashira; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  The roles of the lateral intraparietal area and frontal eye field in guiding eye movements in free viewing search behavior.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  The functional roles of neural remapping in cortex.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Koorosh Mirpour; Yelda Alkan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Eye movement characteristics in schizophrenia: A recent update with clinical implications.

Authors:  Kentaro Morita; Kenichiro Miura; Kiyoto Kasai; Ryota Hashimoto
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2019-11-27

6.  Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls.

Authors:  Tidhar Lev-Ari; Yael Zahar; Arpit Agarwal; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Modeling the effects of perisaccadic attention on gaze statistics during scene viewing.

Authors:  Lisa Schwetlick; Lars Oliver Martin Rothkegel; Hans Arne Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.