Literature DB >> 30644807

Radiation Dose Monitoring for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures: Effect on Patient Radiation Exposure.

Bob Liu1, Joshua A Hirsch1, Xinhua Li1, Robert M Sheridan1, Madan M Rehani1, Hui Zheng1, James D Rabinov1.   

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the clinical effect of continuous dose monitoring and patient follow-up for fluoroscopically guided vascular interventional procedures over 8 years. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, an in-house semiautomated system was developed for fluoroscopic dose monitoring. The quarterly number of procedures from January 2010 to December 2017 was analyzed with count time series to estimate quarterly change rate. Technologists recorded four dose surrogates in custom fields of institutional dictation software through a Web interface. Radiation doses were transferred automatically to the radiology report and a centralized dose database when the radiologist initiated procedure dictation. A medical physicist reported weekly on procedures with air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r) of 2 Gy or higher to a division-designated radiologist and hospital radiation safety committee who required the attending radiologist to set up follow-up appointments for patients who underwent procedures with a Ka,r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Results There were a total of 41 585 procedures; 1553 (3.7%) procedures had a Ka,r of 2-5 Gy. Among 240 procedures with Ka,r greater than 5 Gy, 22 had Ka,r greater than 9 Gy. The percentage of high Ka,r procedures decreased over time, going from 5.9% in 2010 to 2.0% in 2017 for procedures with Ka,r of 2-5 Gy and from 1.0% in 2010 to 0.13% in 2017 for procedures with Ka,r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Relative reduction per quarter was approximately 2.7% (95% confidence interval: 1.5%, 3.8%) for Ka,r of 2-5 Gy and 4.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.5%, 7.6%) for Ka,r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Conclusion Eight-year temporal trends show three- to eightfold reduction in the number of high-dose procedures. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Balter in this issue.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30644807     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019180799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  Challenges in Dosimetry and Radiation Dose Trends.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  High-Dose Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Patients: Radiation Management Recommendations for Interventionalists.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Donald L Miller; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product.

Authors:  Xinhua Li; Joshua Adam Hirsch; Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Theodore Alan Marschall; Bob Liu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Digital variance angiography allows about 70% decrease of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Marcell Gyánó; Márton Berczeli; Csaba Csobay-Novák; Dávid Szöllősi; Viktor I Óriás; István Góg; János P Kiss; Dániel S Veres; Krisztián Szigeti; Szabolcs Osváth; Ákos Pataki; Viktória Juhász; Zoltán Oláh; Péter Sótonyi; Balázs Nemes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.