Literature DB >> 12847357

Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer.

E L Bokey1, P H Chapuis, O F Dent, B J Mander, I P Bissett, R C Newland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors.
METHODS: Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980.
RESULTS: Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980.
CONCLUSION: As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12847357     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  37 in total

1.  Emergent Colectomy Is Independently Associated with Decreased Long-Term Overall Survival in Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Bradley J Hensley; Carla F Justiniano; Courtney Boodry; Alex A Swanger; Reza Arsalanizadeh; Katia Noyes; John R Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Proposal of a new classification system for complete mesocolic excison in right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  S Benz; A Tannapfel; Y Tam; A Grünenwald; S Vollmer; I Stricker
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients.

Authors:  J W Shin; A H Y Amar; S H Kim; J M Kwak; S J Baek; J S Cho; J Kim
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Terminology and nomenclature in colonic surgery: universal application of a rule-based approach derived from updates on mesenteric anatomy.

Authors:  J C Coffey; R Sehgal; K Culligan; C Dunne; D McGrath; N Lawes; D Walsh
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a review of the fascial composition of the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  Makio Mike; Nobuyasu Kano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali Chaouch; Mohamed Wejih Dougaz; Ibtissem Bouasker; Hichem Jerraya; Wafa Ghariani; Mehdi Khalfallah; Ramzi Nouira; Chadli Dziri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery for Cancer: What Is the Role of Complete Mesocolic Excision and Splenic Flexure Mobilization?

Authors:  Rosario Vecchio; Salvatore Marchese; Eva Intagliata
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Benz; Hagen Barlag; Michael Gerken; Alois Fürst; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series.

Authors:  Ming Li Ho; Cheryl Chong; Shen Ann Yeo; Chee Yung Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  The peri-esophageal connective tissue layers and related compartments: visualization by histology and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T J Weijs; L Goense; P S N van Rossum; G J Meijer; A L H M W van Lier; F J Wessels; M N G Braat; I M Lips; J P Ruurda; M A Cuesta; R van Hillegersberg; R L A W Bleys
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.