| Literature DB >> 30643530 |
Abdelaaty A Shahat1,2, Riaz Ullah1,3, Ali S Alqahtani1, Mansour S Alsaid1, Husseiny A Husseiny4, Osaid T R Al Meanazel5.
Abstract
Eriobotrya japonica is traditionally used as an antipyretic, digestive, and diuretic agent. Its flowers possess free radical-scavenging, antioxidative, and hepatoprotective effects. We investigated the hepatoprotective potential of E. japonica leaf extract and its various fractions against hepatotoxicity in rats. Liver injury was stimulated by the oral administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4; 2.5 mL/kg b.wt.). Male albino rats (n = 55) were distributed arbitrarily into 11 groups: Group I, normal control group; Group II, CCl4 (positive control group); Group III, CCl4 + silymarin; Groups IV and V, CCl4 + two doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg of the 80% methanolic extract of E. japonica leaves, respectively; Groups VI and VII, CCl4 + 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of the ethyl acetate fraction, respectively; Groups VIII and IX, CCl4 + 250 and 500 mg/kg of the butanol fraction, respectively; and Groups X and XI, CCl4 + 250 and 500 mg/kg of the aqueous fraction of E. Japonica leaves, respectively. CCl4-treated rats that were given 250 or 500 mg/kg of the methanol extract of E. Japonica leaves, or its ethyl acetate, butanol, or aqueous fractions, had significantly lower levels of biochemical parameters such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphate, total protein, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and bilirubin levels than those of the CCl4 positive group. However, the extract and fractions did not significantly affect lipid profiles. Thus, we conclude that Eriobotrya leaf extract and its fractions have a hepatoprotective effect against CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in rats.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30643530 PMCID: PMC6311294 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3782768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of various E. Japonica leaf extracts and fractions on serum marker enzymes in control and experimental rats.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 107.33±3.09 | 26.08±1.51 | 341.00±7.13 | 5.71±0.24 | 0.57±0.01 |
|
| 339.16±5.28∗∗∗ | 301.00±6.00∗∗∗ | 586.33±7.77∗∗∗ | 17.70±0.87∗∗∗ | 2.94±0.06∗∗∗ |
|
| 154.66±4.95∗∗∗ | 88.15±6.47∗∗∗ | 396.6±711.61∗∗∗ | 7.31±0.21∗∗∗ | 1.00±0.04∗∗∗ |
|
| 333.66±5.25 | 295.83±5.24 | 584.50±7.96 | 15.66±0.55 | 2.95±0.04 |
|
| 314.33±5.40∗ | 291.66±5.09 | 570.00±8.70 | 15.23±0.35∗ | 2.79±0.04 |
|
| 278.33±6.08∗∗∗ | 196.50±6.33∗∗∗ | 492.3±5.2∗∗∗ | 12.71±0.35∗∗∗ | 1.85±0.06∗∗∗ |
|
| 194.16±5.46∗∗∗ | 156.66±5.32∗∗∗ | 441.0±6.24∗∗∗ | 10.41±0.26∗∗∗ | 1.40±0.03∗∗∗ |
|
| 265.50±8.55∗∗∗ | 170.16±7.21∗∗∗ | 468.0±8.1∗∗∗ | 10.11±0.24∗∗∗ | 1.81±0.07∗∗∗ |
|
| 198.50±4.77∗∗∗ | 137.16±3.09∗∗∗ | 428.1±6.44∗∗∗ | 8.55±0.35∗∗∗ | 1.23±0.05∗∗∗ |
|
| 318.50±8.00 | 310.50±4.50 | 594.50±7.39 | 16.76±0.53 | 2.98±0.04 |
|
| 297.3±5.14∗∗∗ | 292.33±5.00 | 582.83±15.47 | 16.06±0.84 | 2.82±0.05 |
All values represent mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ANOVA. As compared to that of the normal control group; as compared to that of the CCl4 positive control group.
Effect of E. Japonica leaf extract and fractions on metabolism and serum lipoproteins in control and experimental rats.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 108.3±3.08 | 81.88±2.41 | 47.56±1.14 | 44.39±3.09 | 16.37±0.48 |
|
| 231.5±8.5∗∗∗ | 187.83±3.87∗∗∗ | 22.93±0.95∗∗∗ | 171.0±8.19∗∗∗ | 37.56±0.77∗∗∗ |
|
| 128.5±3.5∗∗∗ | 104.51±3.56∗∗∗ | 44.6±1.30∗∗∗ | 62.9±3.5∗∗∗ | 20.90±0.77∗∗∗ |
|
| 223.0±4.78 | 192.83±4.85 | 24.91±0.54 | 159.5±4.3 | 38.56±0.97 |
|
| 211.16±4.4 | 187.5±5.2 | 26.43±0.39∗∗ | 147.23±3.76∗ | 37.50±1.04 |
|
| 186.1±4.5∗∗∗ | 157.5±3.7∗∗∗ | 31.4±1.0∗∗∗ | 123.1±4.7∗∗∗ | 31.50±0.74∗∗∗ |
|
| 155.5±4.1∗∗∗ | 137.0±3.8∗∗∗ | 38.40±0.89∗∗∗ | 89.7±4.11∗∗∗ | 27.4±0.77∗∗∗ |
|
| 150.3±3.3∗∗∗ | 128.6±3.4∗∗∗ | 35.41±0.88∗∗∗ | 89.1±4.19∗∗∗ | 25.72±0.76∗∗∗ |
|
| 129.6±8.3∗∗∗ | 125.8±3.4±∗∗∗ | 40.81±1.21∗∗∗ | 63.6±3.8∗∗∗ | 25.16±0.68∗∗∗ |
|
| 219.83±7.5 | 180.16±7.4 | 25.58±1.13 | 161.2±9.4 | 36.03±1.48 |
|
| 215.66±4.4 | 166.33±5.16∗ | 27.58±0.92∗∗ | 154.8±4.8 | 33.26±1.03∗∗ |
All values represent mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ANOVA, followed by Dennett's multiple comparison test. As compared to that of the control group; as compared to that of the CCl4 positive control group.
Effect of E. japonica leaf extract and fractions on MDA, NP-SH, and total protein levels in liver tissues.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.11±0.04 | 6.33±0.28 | 121.35±3.36 |
|
| 7.43±0.29∗∗∗ | 1.41±0.21∗∗∗ | 59.48±1.89∗∗∗ |
|
| 2.15±0.09∗∗∗ | 5.91±0.26∗∗∗ | 106.98±2.28∗∗∗ |
|
| 6.76±0.38 | 1.77±0.29 | 59.88±2.31 |
|
| 5.59±0.24∗∗∗ | 2.20±0.25∗ | 66.66±1.68∗ |
|
| 4.25±0.18∗∗∗ | 4.81±0.21∗∗∗ | 73.45±1.00∗∗∗ |
|
| 3.60±0.12∗∗∗ | 5.13±0.28∗∗∗ | 81.83±1.89∗∗∗ |
|
| 3.60±0.19∗∗∗ | 5.31±0.13∗∗∗ | 77.44±2.59∗∗∗ |
|
| 2.79±0.10∗∗∗ | 5.00±0.27∗∗∗ | 95.80±2.83∗∗∗ |
|
| 6.87±0.3 | 1.52±0.2 | 58.68±1.60 |
|
| 5.52±0.21∗∗∗ | 2.50±0.28∗ | 67.46±1.43∗∗ |
All values represent mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ANOVA, followed by Dennett's multiple comparison test. As compared to that of the control group; as compared to that of the CCl4 positive control group.
Figure 1Histopathological examination of rat liver tissues (H & E stain × 150).