Literature DB >> 30643316

Best Practices on Examination Construction, Administration, and Feedback.

Mary Elizabeth Ray1, Kimberly K Daugherty2, Lisa Lebovitz3, Michael J Rudolph4, Veronica P Shuford5, Margarita V DiVall6,7.   

Abstract

Examinations are typically used in higher education to objectively assess student learning, and they are also used as a frequent assessment tool in the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. This paper describes best practices and provides examples for faculty to build reliable and valid examinations, ensure examination security and deter academic misconduct, and enhance student learning and achievement of course objectives. Colleges and schools of pharmacy can incorporate these concepts into comprehensive examination policies and focus faculty development efforts on improving the examination purpose, design, and experience for both faculty and students.

Keywords:  administration; assessment; best practice; examination; security

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30643316      PMCID: PMC6325455          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  16 in total

1.  Measurement practices: methods for developing content-valid student examinations.

Authors:  Patrick D Bridge; Joseph Musial; Robert Frank; Thomas Roe; Shlomo Sawilowsky
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students.

Authors:  Suzanne M Rabi; Lynn R Patton; Nancy Fjortoft; David P Zgarrick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Backward course design: making the end the beginning.

Authors:  Kimberly K Daugherty
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Assessing dental students' competence: best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education.

Authors:  Judith E N Albino; Stephen K Young; Laura M Neumann; Gene A Kramer; Sandra C Andrieu; Lindsey Henson; Bruce Horn; William D Hendricson
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Twelve tips for blueprinting.

Authors:  Sylvain Coderre; Wayne Woloschuk; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Effects of question formats on student and item performance.

Authors:  David J Caldwell; Adam N Pate
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Promoting academic integrity among health care students.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Wei C Yuet
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.637

8.  Impact of adopting a newly developed blueprinting method and relating it to item analysis on students' performance.

Authors:  Rani Ghazi Ahmad; Omayma A E Hamed
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Security considerations and recommendations in computer-based testing.

Authors:  Saleh M Al-Saleem; Hanif Ullah
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-09-01

10.  How Question Types Reveal Student Thinking: An Experimental Comparison of Multiple-True-False and Free-Response Formats.

Authors:  Joanna K Hubbard; Macy A Potts; Brian A Couch
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Best Practices Related to Examination Item Construction and Post-hoc Review.

Authors:  Michael J Rudolph; Kimberly K Daugherty; Mary Elizabeth Ray; Veronica P Shuford; Lisa Lebovitz; Margarita V DiVall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.