| Literature DB >> 30642244 |
Margaret Worthington1,2, Masumi Ebina3, Naoki Yamanaka4, Christopher Heffelfinger5, Constanza Quintero6, Yeny Patricia Zapata6, Juan Guillermo Perez6, Michael Selvaraj6, Manabu Ishitani6, Jorge Duitama6,7, Juan Fernando de la Hoz6,8, Idupulapati Rao6,9, Stephen Dellaporta5, Joe Tohme6, Jacobo Arango6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The apomictic reproductive mode of Brachiaria (syn. Urochloa) forage species allows breeders to faithfully propagate heterozygous genotypes through seed over multiple generations. In Brachiaria, reproductive mode segregates as single dominant locus, the apospory-specific genomic region (ASGR). The AGSR has been mapped to an area of reduced recombination on Brachiaria decumbens chromosome 5. A primer pair designed within ASGR-BABY BOOM-like (BBML), the candidate gene for the parthenogenesis component of apomixis in Pennisetum squamulatum, was diagnostic for reproductive mode in the closely related species B. ruziziensis, B. brizantha, and B. decumbens. In this study, we used a mapping population of the distantly related commercial species B. humidicola to map the ASGR and test for conservation of ASGR-BBML sequences across Brachiaria species.Entities:
Keywords: Aneuploidy; Apomixis; Apospory; BABY BOOM; Brachiaria; Genotyping-by-sequencing; Molecular karyotyping; Parthenogenesis; Segmental allopolyploidy; Urochloa
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30642244 PMCID: PMC6332668 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5392-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Expected genotypic ratios for SDA-DDA linkages assuming tetrasomic or hexasomic inheritancea
| Tetrasomic | Hexasomic | |
|---|---|---|
| ABb | 1/2–1/6r | 1/2–1/5r |
| A | 1/6r | 1/5r |
| B | 1/3 + 1/6r | 3/10 + 1/5r |
| 0 | 1/6–1/6r | 1/5–1/5r |
aExpected genotypic ratio of progeny for single dose allele (SDA; A000 × 0000) and double dose allele (DDA; BB00 × 0000) markers linked in coupling
b‘AB’ indicates presence of segregating alleles in both SDA and DDA markers, ‘A’ indicates presence of the segregating allele for only the SDA marker, ‘B’ indicates presence of the segregating allele for only the DDA marker, ‘0’ indicates that neither segregating allele is present
Reproductive mode of 77 F1 progeny in the CIAT 26146 x CIAT 16888 mapping population evaluated with embryo sac analysis
| Reproductive mode | Sexual | Apomictic |
|---|---|---|
| No. of progeny | 37 | 40 |
| Proportion of pistils with Panicum-type embryo sacs | ||
| Mean | 0 | 0.81 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0.05 |
| Maximum | 0 | 1 |
| Standard Deviation | 0 | 0.21 |
| Proportion of pistils with multiple embryo sacs | ||
| Mean | 0 | 0.40 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum | 0 | 1 |
| Standard Deviation | 0 | 0.27 |
| Proportion of pistils with abnormal or aborted embryo sacs | ||
| Mean | 0.41 | 0.13 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum | 0.68 | 0.62 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.18 | 0.18 |
CIAT 26146 and CIAT 16888 parental haplotype maps
| Linkage Group | CIAT 26146 | CIAT 16888 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of markers | Length (cM) | No. of markers | Length (cM) | |
| 1a | 97 | 86.0 | 94 | 154.1 |
| 1b | 89 | 129.1 | 88 | 151.2 |
| 1c | 82 | 109.8 | 52 | 117.9 |
| 1d | 72 | 92.7 | 46 | 148.4 |
| 1e | 70 | 105.2 | 28 | 88.0 |
| 1f | 65 | 100.4 | 16 | 103.6 |
| 2a | 93 | 91.8 | 129 | 169.3 |
| 2b | 99 | 97.5 | 59 | 181.0 |
| 2c | 96 | 138.7 | 63 | 126.5 |
| 2d | 87 | 111.9 | 39 | 139.1 |
| 2e | 86 | 106.1 | 17 | 111.0 |
| 2f | 77 | 89.8 | 9 | 68.3 |
| 3a | 72 | 85.1 | 63 | 129.9 |
| 3b | 73 | 68.9 | 52 | 142.3 |
| 3c | 62 | 78.9 | 41 | 139.7 |
| 3d | 58 | 93.9 | 27 | 126.8 |
| 3e | 58 | 77.8 | 12 | 57.4 |
| 3f | 53 | 81.7 | 12 | 79.1 |
| 4a | 93 | 114.2 | 98 | 177.1 |
| 4b | 95 | 108.6 | 71 | 165.3 |
| 4c | 84 | 124.2 | 57 | 155.8 |
| 4d | 81 | 108.6 | 50 | 181.2 |
| 4e | 77 | 101.7 | 20 | 144.8 |
| 4f | 73 | 99.1 | 11 | 85.7 |
| 5a | 82 | 180.0 | 65 | 135.5 |
| 5b | 57 | 108.8 | 57 | 109.9 |
| 5c | 57 | 109.3 | 42 | 132.4 |
| 5d | 46 | 81.4 | 34 | 107.2 |
| 5e | 41 | 60.3 | 29 | 105.8 |
| 5f | 33 | 73.2 | – | – |
| 6a | 82 | 96.2 | 53 | 103.5 |
| 6b | 79 | 96.1 | 48 | 100.0 |
| 6c | 74 | 101.3 | 51 | 123.7 |
| 6d | 59 | 81.1 | 39 | 105.3 |
| 6e | 51 | 58.0 | 17 | 65.0 |
| 6f | 36 | 110.1 | 17 | 63.4 |
| 6 g | – | – | 15 | 68.0 |
| Total | 2589 | 3557.7 | 1621 | 4362.9 |
Fig. 1Parental linkage maps. The 36 linkage groups of the CIAT 26146 maternal linkage map (a) and the 36 linkage groups of the CIAT 16888 paternal linkage map (b). Homologous linkage groups were identified and assigned to chromosomes 1–6 based on synteny with foxtail millet (S. italica), molecular karyotyping, and shared linkages with double dose allele markers. Marker positions are expressed in centimorgans
Fig. 2Synteny with Foxtail Millet. Alignment of markers mapped to the CIAT 26146 (a) and CIAT 16888 (b) genetic linkage maps with unique physical positions on the foxtail millet (S. italica) reference genome at a cutoff of E-value < 1 × 10− 4. Markers mapped to haplotypes a-g of each chromosome are represented with red, blue, green, purple, pink, black, and orange dots
DDA markers linked in coupling with parental haplotype linkage groupsa
| Haplotype pair | CIAT 26146 | CIAT 16888 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| a,b | 5 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| a,c | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| a,d | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| b,c | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 5 |
| b,d | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 3 |
| c,d | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 18 | 2 | 6 |
| a,e | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| a,f | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| a,g | –c | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| b,e | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| b,f | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| b,g | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| c,e | 4 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| c,f | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| c,g | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| d,e | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| d,f | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| d,g | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| e,f | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 9 | – | 1 |
| e,g | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| f,g | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 |
| total | 45 | 63 | 34 | 52 | 14 | 46 | 39 | 46 | 22 | 71 | 12 | 29 |
|
| 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.92 | 0.28 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.035 | < 0.001 |
aNumber of double dose alleles (DDAs) linked in coupling with each possible pair of SDA haplotypes (a-g) of the six base chromosomes of B. humidicola on the CIAT 26146 and CIAT 16888 genetic maps
bP values for χ2 tests of random distribution of shared DDA linkages assuming there is no differentiation of sub-genomes
cIndicates that this haplotype pair does not exist for the given chromosome
Fig. 3Molecular karyotyping of the parental linkage maps Linkage and segregation of markers in (a) the CIAT 26146 maternal haplotype map, (b) the CIAT 16888 paternal haplotype map, (c) CIAT 16888 chromosome 5 homologs a-e, and (d) CIAT 16888 chromosome 6 homologs a-g. SNP markers are arranged by their genetic position (not drawn to scale). Genetic regions with statistically significant linkage are indicated in red, orange, and yellow while regions with significant segregation are indicated with shades of blue. Light, medium, and dark blue indicate segregation significant at 0.001 < P < 0.05, 0.00001 < P < 0.001, and P < 0.00005, respectively. Yellow, orange and red indicate linkage significant at 0.001 < P < 0.05, 0.00001 < P < 0.001, P < 0.00001, respectively
Fig. 4Read Frequency in CIAT 16888. Relative depth of coverage (read frequency) of the segregating allele in heterozygous loci in the CIAT 16888 paternal linkage map
Fig. 5Comparison of the ASGR carrier chromosome with the physicial map of S. italica chromosome 1. Synteny between CIAT 16888 linkage group 1b, the carrier chromosome of the apospory specific genomic region (ASGR), and foxtail millet (S. italica) chromosome 1. The ASGR and the ASGR-specific amplicon from p778/p779 are in red and blue bold font respectively. Genetic positions are given in centimorgans. The physical map of foxtail millet chromosome 1 has been inverted to facilitate visualization of synteny and each unit of the physical map represents 2.5 × 105 bp