| Literature DB >> 30641896 |
Alexey V Medved'ko1, Alexander I Dalinger2, Vyacheslav N Nuriev3, Vera S Semashko4, Andrei V Filatov5, Alexander A Ezhov6,7, Andrei V Churakov8, Judith A K Howard9, Andrey A Shiryaev10,11, Alexander E Baranchikov12,13, Vladimir K Ivanov14,15, Sergey Z Vatsadze16.
Abstract
The acylation of unsymmetrical N-benzylbispidinols in aromatic solvents without an external base led to the formation of supramolecular gels, which possess different thicknesses and degrees of stability depending on the substituents in para-positions of the benzylic group as well as on the nature of the acylating agent and of the solvent used. Structural features of the native gels as well as of their dried forms were studied by complementary techniques including Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and small-angle X-ray scattering and diffraction (SAXS). Structures of the key crystalline compounds were established by X-ray diffraction. An analysis of the obtained data allowed speculation on the crucial structural and condition factors that governed the gel formation. The most important factors were as follows: (i) absence of base, either external or internal; (ii) presence of HCl; (iii) presence of carbonyl and hydroxyl groups to allow hydrogen bonding; and (iv) presence of two (hetero)aromatic rings at both sides of the molecule. The hydrogen bonding involving amide carbonyl, hydroxyl at position 9, and, very probably, ammonium N-H⁺ and Cl- anion appears to be responsible for the formation of infinite molecular chains required for the first step of gel formation. Subsequent lateral cooperation of molecular chains into fibers occurred, presumably, due to the aromatic π-π-stacking interactions. Supercritical carbon dioxide drying of the organogels gave rise to aerogels with morphologies different from that of air-dried samples.Entities:
Keywords: AFM study; ATR spectroscopy; FTIR spectroscopy; SAXS; SEM; TEM; X-ray diffraction; bispidines; organic nanomaterials; supramolecular gels
Year: 2019 PMID: 30641896 PMCID: PMC6359647 DOI: 10.3390/nano9010089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Scheme 1Synthetic routes to the target amides 4.
Scheme 2(a) Chemical connectivity scheme for structurally characterized samples. (b) Distances and deviations.
Selected geometric parameters for bispidines 4cb, 2c, 3a, 3c, 4da.
| 4cb | 2c | 3a | 3c | 4da*HCl | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| p-FC6H4CH2-, —p-ClC6H4C(=O)- | p-FC6H4CH2-, —-CH(=O) | C6H4CH2-, —H | p-FC6H4CH2-, —H | p-BrC6H4CH2-, HC6H4C(=O)- |
|
| 1.423(3) | 1.472(6)* | 1.4195(12) | 1.4178(12) | 1.416(12) |
|
| 1.469(3) | 1.458(3) | 1.4695(15) | 1.4691(14) | 1.458(14) |
|
| 1.465(3) | 1.471(3) | 1.4653(14) | 1.4658(13) | 1.505(13) |
|
| 1.339(3) | 1.331(3) | — | — | 1.375(13) |
|
| 330.3 | 330.0 | 331.4 | 331.9 | 332.1 |
|
| 359.4 | 359.5 | — | — | 353.7 |
|
| — | — | 325.0 | 325.8 | — |
|
| =O, 2.784(3) | =O, 2.665(5) | R2HN, 2.7250(12) | R2HN, 2.7157(12) | Cl-, 3.049(10) |
|
| 2.825(3) | 2.830(4) | 2.8372(13) | 2.8309(13) | 2.790(14) |
* for major component of disorder. ** average distances between nitrogen and carbon atoms (N-Cendo—between secondary amine nitrogen atoms and skeleton carbon atoms; NBz-C—between benzyl substituted nitrogen atoms and skeleton carbon atoms; N-CO—between amide nitrogen atoms and carbonyl carbon atoms). *** the sum of C-N-C angles (NBz—benzyl substituted nitrogen atom; Namid—amide nitrogen atom; NH—secondary amine nitrogen atom). **** length of hydrogen bonds. ***** intramolecular distance between nitrogen atoms.
Figure 1Hydrogen-bonded chains in structure 4cb.
Figure 2Hydrogen-bonded chains in structure 2c.
Figure 3Hydrogen-bonded chains in structure 3a.
Figure 4Hydrogen-bonded chains in structure 3c.
Figure 5The changes in ATR spectra of 4ab during solvent removal. Benzene peaks are shown in blue. See text for details.
Figure 6AFM, SEM, and TEM images for the dried gel benzene@4ce*HCl.
Figure 7SEM micrographs of dry gel samples obtained by different solvent removal methods from benzene@4cb*HCl: (a) bulk xerogel; (b) gel coated on the glass surface; (c) liquid CO2 washing; (d) sc-CO2 washing. Scale bar is 1 micrometer.
Figure 8SEM micrographs of the benzene@4cb*HCl xerogel sample obtained for the same area by (a) SE2 and (b) BSE detectors. Scale bar is 2 μm.
Figure 9SEM micrographs of dry gel samples obtained by different solvent removal methods from benzene@4ce*HCl: (a) direct air-drying; (b) sc-CO2 drying. Scale bar is 1 μm.
Figure 10Small-angle X-ray scattering patterns of samples benzene@4ce*HCl (red) and benzene@4de*HCl (black).
Scheme 3Schematic representation of a possible method of gel formation.
Scheme 4Schematic representation of the structural changes upon solvent removal from the benzenogel.