OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to verify the effectiveness of physiotherapy associated with cognitive training to improve cognition and quality of life in individuals with Parkinson disease. DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial involving 58 individuals with mild to moderate Parkinson disease, randomly distributed into two groups: motor group and cognitive-motor group. Both groups were assessed for cognition and quality of life at the beginning of the study, at the end of the intervention protocols, and 3 mos after the end of the intervention. The following instruments were used to assess cognition and quality of life: Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Verbal fluency test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Cognitive and perceptual assessment by pictures, Trail Making Test, Clock Drawing Executive Test, and Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire. The motor group engaged in motor physiotherapy, whereas the cognitive-motor group underwent combined motor physiotherapy with cognitive training. RESULTS: The intragroup analysis revealed that both groups presented improved cognition (memory and visuospatial function domains) and quality of life after execution of the protocols, but without statistically significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the intervention moments, the two treatment approaches used were effective for the outcomes: memory, visuospatial function, and quality of life in both groups.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to verify the effectiveness of physiotherapy associated with cognitive training to improve cognition and quality of life in individuals with Parkinson disease. DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial involving 58 individuals with mild to moderate Parkinson disease, randomly distributed into two groups: motor group and cognitive-motor group. Both groups were assessed for cognition and quality of life at the beginning of the study, at the end of the intervention protocols, and 3 mos after the end of the intervention. The following instruments were used to assess cognition and quality of life: Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Verbal fluency test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Cognitive and perceptual assessment by pictures, Trail Making Test, Clock Drawing Executive Test, and Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire. The motor group engaged in motor physiotherapy, whereas the cognitive-motor group underwent combined motor physiotherapy with cognitive training. RESULTS: The intragroup analysis revealed that both groups presented improved cognition (memory and visuospatial function domains) and quality of life after execution of the protocols, but without statistically significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the intervention moments, the two treatment approaches used were effective for the outcomes: memory, visuospatial function, and quality of life in both groups.
Authors: Nariana Mattos Figueiredo Sousa; Ana Cristina da Mata Neri; Ivar Viana Brandi; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki Journal: Dement Neuropsychol Date: 2021 Jan-Mar
Authors: Barbara Spanò; Maria G Lombardi; Massimo De Tollis; Maria A Szczepanska; Claudia Ricci; Alice Manzo; Simone Giuli; Lorenzo Polidori; Ivo A Griffini; Fulvia Adriano; Carlo Caltagirone; Roberta Annicchiarico Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-01-27
Authors: Marios Spanakis; Ioanna Xylouri; Evridiki Patelarou; Athina Patelarou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.614