Andreina Giustiniani1, Lorenza Maistrello2, Laura Danesin2, Elena Rigon2, Francesca Burgio2. 1. Neuropsychology Department, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy. andreina.giustiniani@hsancamillo.it. 2. Neuropsychology Department, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and affect patients' quality of life. Pharmacological interventions often do not improve such deficits that might benefit of cognitive rehabilitation. However, previous meta-analysis on this topic reported inconsistent results. Clarifying the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation would be pivotal to optimize treatment and reduce care's costs. This meta-analysis aims at determining whether current literature lays in favor of the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in PD and at understanding whether its effect might change depending on the trained cognitive domain. METHODS: We searched online databases for studies concerning cognitive rehabilitation in PD. Fourteen studies encompassing 767 participants were included. Analyses were conducted for each cognitive domain separately, examining several neuropsychological measures for each function. RESULTS: We found that rehabilitation improves global cognition, executive functions, and long- and short-term memory. CONCLUSION: The current body of research indicates that cognitive rehabilitation improves specific cognitive deficits in PD and that it should be tailored on patients' specific impairments. These interventions should be employed considering that not all the cognitive domains might benefit of a cognitive training. Finally, the high heterogeneity among studies suggests the need for more controlled clinical trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and affect patients' quality of life. Pharmacological interventions often do not improve such deficits that might benefit of cognitive rehabilitation. However, previous meta-analysis on this topic reported inconsistent results. Clarifying the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation would be pivotal to optimize treatment and reduce care's costs. This meta-analysis aims at determining whether current literature lays in favor of the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in PD and at understanding whether its effect might change depending on the trained cognitive domain. METHODS: We searched online databases for studies concerning cognitive rehabilitation in PD. Fourteen studies encompassing 767 participants were included. Analyses were conducted for each cognitive domain separately, examining several neuropsychological measures for each function. RESULTS: We found that rehabilitation improves global cognition, executive functions, and long- and short-term memory. CONCLUSION: The current body of research indicates that cognitive rehabilitation improves specific cognitive deficits in PD and that it should be tailored on patients' specific impairments. These interventions should be employed considering that not all the cognitive domains might benefit of a cognitive training. Finally, the high heterogeneity among studies suggests the need for more controlled clinical trials.
Authors: Heike Stockner; Martin Sojer; Sascha Hering; Wolfgang Nachbauer; Klaus Seppi; Christoph Schmidauer; Werner Poewe; Sylvia M Boesch Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Daniela Berg; Ronald B Postuma; Charles H Adler; Bastiaan R Bloem; Piu Chan; Bruno Dubois; Thomas Gasser; Christopher G Goetz; Glenda Halliday; Lawrence Joseph; Anthony E Lang; Inga Liepelt-Scarfone; Irene Litvan; Kenneth Marek; José Obeso; Wolfgang Oertel; C Warren Olanow; Werner Poewe; Matthew Stern; Günther Deuschl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Michael G Frantz; Ryan J Kast; Hilary M Dorton; Katherine S Chapman; Aaron W McGee Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Irene Litvan; Dag Aarsland; Charles H Adler; Jennifer G Goldman; Jaime Kulisevsky; Brit Mollenhauer; Maria C Rodriguez-Oroz; Alexander I Tröster; Daniel Weintraub Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Werner Poewe; Klaus Seppi; Caroline M Tanner; Glenda M Halliday; Patrik Brundin; Jens Volkmann; Anette-Eleonore Schrag; Anthony E Lang Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 52.329