Literature DB >> 30639292

Local cortical circuit correlates of altered EEG in the mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.

Sonal Goswami1, Sheridan Cavalier1, Vinay Sridhar1, Kimberly M Huber2, Jay R Gibson3.   

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings in Fragile X syndrome (FXS) patients have revealed enhanced sensory responses, enhanced resting "gamma frequency" (30-100 Hz) activity, and a decreased ability for sensory stimuli to modulate cortical activity at gamma frequencies. Similar changes are observed in the FXS model mouse - the Fmr1 knockout. These alterations may become effective biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment of FXS. Therefore, it is critical to better understand what circuit properties underlie these changes. We employed Channelrhodopsin2 to optically activate local circuits in the auditory cortical region in brain slices to examine how changes in local circuit function may be related to EEG changes. We focused on layers 2/3 and 5 (L2/3 and L5). In Fmr1 knockout mice, light-driven excitation of L2/3 revealed hyperexcitability and increased gamma frequency power in both local L2/3 and L5 circuits. Moreover, there is increased synchrony in the gamma frequency band between L2/3 and L5. Hyperexcitability and increased gamma power were not observed in L5 with L5 light-driven excitation, indicating that these changes were layer-specific. A component of L2/3 network hyperexcitability is independent of ionotropic receptor mediated synaptic transmission and may be mediated by increased intrinsic excitability of L2/3 neurons. Finally, lovastatin, a candidate therapeutic compound for FXS that targets ERK signaling did not normalize changes in gamma activity. In conclusion, hyperactivity and increased gamma activity in local neocortical circuits, together with increased gamma synchrony between circuits, provide a putative substrate for EEG alterations observed in both FXS patients and the FXS mouse model.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortex; EEG; Fragile X; Gamma; Hyperexcitability; Synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30639292      PMCID: PMC6371815          DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Dis        ISSN: 0969-9961            Impact factor:   5.996


  46 in total

1.  Alterations in the auditory startle response in Fmr1 targeted mutant mouse models of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Darci M Nielsen; William J Derber; Danielle A McClellan; Linda S Crnic
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Altered anxiety-related and social behaviors in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  C M Spencer; O Alekseyenko; E Serysheva; L A Yuva-Paylor; R Paylor
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deletion rescues auditory evoked potential habituation deficit in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Teresa H Wen; Sarah Reinhard; Mike S Hsu; Harpreet Sidhu; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Hypersensitivity to mGluR5 and ERK1/2 leads to excessive protein synthesis in the hippocampus of a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Emily K Osterweil; Dilja D Krueger; Kimberly Reinhold; Mark F Bear
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Altered neocortical rhythmic activity states in Fmr1 KO mice are due to enhanced mGluR5 signaling and involve changes in excitatory circuitry.

Authors:  Seth A Hays; Kimberly M Huber; Jay R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Fmr1 knockout mice: a model to study fragile X mental retardation. The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  The translation of translational control by FMRP: therapeutic targets for FXS.

Authors:  Jennifer C Darnell; Eric Klann
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Developmental trajectories and correlates of sensory processing in young boys with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Grace T Baranek; Jane E Roberts; Fabian J David; John Sideris; Penny L Mirrett; Deborah D Hatton; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Phys Occup Ther Pediatr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.360

9.  Circuit level defects in the developing neocortex of Fragile X mice.

Authors:  J Tiago Gonçalves; James E Anstey; Peyman Golshani; Carlos Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Reduced habituation of auditory evoked potentials indicate cortical hyper-excitability in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  L E Ethridge; S P White; M W Mosconi; J Wang; M J Byerly; J A Sweeney
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  15 in total

1.  Development of Neural Response to Novel Sounds in Fragile X Syndrome: Potential Biomarkers.

Authors:  Lauren Ethridge; Andrew Thaliath; Jeremy Kraff; Karan Nijhawan; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-11-01

2.  Audiogenic Seizures in the Fmr1 Knock-Out Mouse Are Induced by Fmr1 Deletion in Subcortical, VGlut2-Expressing Excitatory Neurons and Require Deletion in the Inferior Colliculus.

Authors:  Darya Gonzalez; Madison Tomasek; Seth Hays; Vinay Sridhar; Simon Ammanuel; Chia-Wei Chang; Karen Pawlowski; Kimberly M Huber; Jay R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sex differences in resting EEG power in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Smith; Ernest V Pedapati; Rui Liu; Lauren M Schmitt; Kelli C Dominick; Rebecca C Shaffer; John A Sweeney; Craig A Erickson
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  An Observational Study With the Janssen Autism Knowledge Engine (JAKE®) in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Seth L Ness; Abigail Bangerter; Nikolay V Manyakov; David Lewin; Matthew Boice; Andrew Skalkin; Shyla Jagannatha; Meenakshi Chatterjee; Geraldine Dawson; Matthew S Goodwin; Robert Hendren; Bennett Leventhal; Frederick Shic; Jean A Frazier; Yvette Janvier; Bryan H King; Judith S Miller; Christopher J Smith; Russell H Tobe; Gahan Pandina
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Spontaneous Activity Patterns Are Altered in the Developing Visual Cortex of the Fmr1 Knockout Mouse.

Authors:  Juliette E Cheyne; Nawal Zabouri; David Baddeley; Christian Lohmann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Auditory EEG Biomarkers in Fragile X Syndrome: Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Lauren E Ethridge; Lisa A De Stefano; Lauren M Schmitt; Nicholas E Woodruff; Kara L Brown; Morgan Tran; Jun Wang; Ernest V Pedapati; Craig A Erickson; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-09

7.  Developmental Effects on Auditory Neural Oscillatory Synchronization Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Lisa A De Stefano; Lauren M Schmitt; Stormi P White; Matthew W Mosconi; John A Sweeney; Lauren E Ethridge
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Dysregulation of GABAA Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission during the Auditory Cortex Critical Period in the Fragile X Syndrome Mouse Model.

Authors:  Yeri J Song; Bo Xing; Aaron J Barbour; Chengwen Zhou; Frances E Jensen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  A Differential Effect of Lovastatin versus Simvastatin in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Melania Muscas; Sang S Seo; Susana R Louros; Emily K Osterweil
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-08-13

10.  A neurophysiological model of speech production deficits in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lauren M Schmitt; Jun Wang; Ernest V Pedapati; Angela John Thurman; Leonard Abbeduto; Craig A Erickson; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2019-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.