Natalie Gilmore1, Erin L Meier2, Jeffrey P Johnson2, Swathi Kiran2. 1. College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ngilmore@bu.edu. 2. College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pretreatment nonlinguistic cognition predicted language treatment outcomes and if so, which specific nonlinguistic cognitive subskills predicted naming therapy outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Study 1 included data from 67 persons with aphasia who underwent language treatment and a pretreatment cognitive-linguistic assessment battery (N=67). Study 2 included data from 27 study 1 participants who completed additional pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive assessments. INTERVENTIONS: 120-minute sessions of sentence comprehension (n=26) or naming treatment (n=41) 2 times per week for up to 10-12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of potential maximal gain (PMG) (assessed immediately after treatment [10-12wk]; formula=mean posttreatment score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) and proportion of potential maximal gain maintained (PMGM) (assessed 12wk after posttreatment [22-24wk]; formula=mean maintenance score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) as outcome variables; and pretreatment assessment scores as predictor variables. RESULTS: In study 1, 37% of participants demonstrated nonlinguistic cognitive deficits. Principal component analyses reduced assessment data to 2 components: linguistic and nonlinguistic cognition. Backward elimination regression revealed that higher linguistic and nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly predicted higher PMG after language therapy. In study 2, principal component analysis of only the nonlinguistic cognitive measures identified 3 components: executive function, verbal short-term memory, and visual short-term memory. Controlling for pretreatment apraxia of speech and auditory comprehension deficits, regression analyses revealed that higher executive function and visual short-term memory significantly predicted higher PMG and PMGM after naming therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly influenced language treatment outcomes and maintenance of therapy gains.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pretreatment nonlinguistic cognition predicted language treatment outcomes and if so, which specific nonlinguistic cognitive subskills predicted naming therapy outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Study 1 included data from 67 persons with aphasia who underwent language treatment and a pretreatment cognitive-linguistic assessment battery (N=67). Study 2 included data from 27 study 1 participants who completed additional pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive assessments. INTERVENTIONS: 120-minute sessions of sentence comprehension (n=26) or naming treatment (n=41) 2 times per week for up to 10-12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of potential maximal gain (PMG) (assessed immediately after treatment [10-12wk]; formula=mean posttreatment score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) and proportion of potential maximal gain maintained (PMGM) (assessed 12wk after posttreatment [22-24wk]; formula=mean maintenance score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) as outcome variables; and pretreatment assessment scores as predictor variables. RESULTS: In study 1, 37% of participants demonstrated nonlinguistic cognitive deficits. Principal component analyses reduced assessment data to 2 components: linguistic and nonlinguistic cognition. Backward elimination regression revealed that higher linguistic and nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly predicted higher PMG after language therapy. In study 2, principal component analysis of only the nonlinguistic cognitive measures identified 3 components: executive function, verbal short-term memory, and visual short-term memory. Controlling for pretreatment apraxia of speech and auditory comprehension deficits, regression analyses revealed that higher executive function and visual short-term memory significantly predicted higher PMG and PMGM after naming therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly influenced language treatment outcomes and maintenance of therapy gains.
Authors: Janina Wilmskoetter; Xiaosong He; Lorenzo Caciagli; Jens H Jensen; Barbara Marebwa; Kathryn A Davis; Julius Fridriksson; Alexandra Basilakos; Lorelei P Johnson; Chris Rorden; Danielle Bassett; Leonardo Bonilha Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Alexandra Basilakos; Jordan Elm; Leigh Ann Spell; Leonardo Bonilha; Chris Rorden; Dirk B den Ouden; Christy Cassarly; Souvik Sen; Argye Hillis; Gregory Hickok; Julius Fridriksson Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-08-05