Literature DB >> 25451043

Between-session intra-individual variability in sustained, selective, and integrational non-linguistic attention in aphasia.

Sarah Villard1, Swathi Kiran2.   

Abstract

A number of studies have identified impairments in one or more types/aspects of attention processing in patients with aphasia (PWA) relative to healthy controls; person-to-person variability in performance on attention tasks within the PWA group has also been noted. Studies using non-linguistic stimuli have found evidence that attention is impaired in this population even in the absence of language processing demands. An underlying impairment in non-linguistic, or domain-general, attention processing could have implications for the ability of PWA to attend during therapy sessions, which in turn could impact long-term treatment outcomes. With this in mind, this study aimed to systematically examine the effect of task complexity on reaction time (RT) during a non-linguistic attention task, in both PWA and controls. Additional goals were to assess the effect of task complexity on between-session intra-individual variability (BS-IIV) in RT and to examine inter-individual differences in BS-IIV. Eighteen PWA and five age-matched neurologically healthy controls each completed a novel computerized non-linguistic attention task measuring five types of attention on each of four different non-consecutive days. A significant effect of task complexity on both RT and BS-IIV in RT was found for the PWA group, whereas the control group showed a significant effect of task complexity on RT but not on BS-IIV in RT. Finally, in addition to these group-level findings, it was noted that different patients exhibited different patterns of BS-IIV, indicating the existence of inter-individual variability in BS-IIV within the PWA group. Results may have implications for session-to-session fluctuations in attention during language testing and therapy for PWA.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Attention; Domain-general; Intra-individual variability; Non-linguistic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451043     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  Nonlinguistic Cognitive Factors Predict Treatment-Induced Recovery in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Natalie Gilmore; Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  More Than the Verbal Stimulus Matters: Visual Attention in Language Assessment for People With Aphasia Using Multiple-Choice Image Displays.

Authors:  Sabine Heuer; Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners' Continuous Performance Test - 2nd edition.

Authors:  Jaime B Lee; Masha Kocherginsky; Leora R Cherney
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Andrew Zu-Sern Wei; Stephanie Gutierrez; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Assessment of alerting, orienting, and executive control in persons with aphasia using the Attention Network Test.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; McKayla Tully; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.773

6.  Acquired Brain Injury in Adults: A Review of Pathophysiology, Recovery, and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Natalie Gilmore; Douglas I Katz; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-08-20

7.  Young Adults With Acquired Brain Injury Show Longitudinal Improvements in Cognition After Intensive Cognitive Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Natalie Gilmore; Daniel Mirman; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Videoconference Administration of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised: Feasibility and Validity.

Authors:  Maria Dekhtyar; Emily J Braun; Anne Billot; Lindsey Foo; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Sentence Processing in Aphasia: An Examination of Material-Specific and General Cognitive Factors.

Authors:  Laura L Murray
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.