Literature DB >> 30639160

Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping.

David Kubicek1, Miroslav Hornak2, Jakub Horak3, Rostislav Navratil3, Gabriela Tauwinklova3, Jiri Rubes4, Katerina Vesela3.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental aneuploidies detected by karyomapping at a blastocyst stage in human-derived IVF embryos? What is the distribution of various types of errors, including rare chromosomal abnormalities?
DESIGN: The incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies was assessed in 967 trophectoderm biopsies from 180 couples who underwent 215 cycles of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease with a known causal mutation with a mean maternal age of 32.7 years. DNA from both parents and a reference sample was genotyped together with the analysed trophectoderm samples by karyomapping (single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based array).
RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31% of the analysed samples. At least one whole chromosomal aneuploidy was detected in 27.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies, whereas a segmental aneuploidy was detected in 5.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies. Our results reveal that segmental aneuploidies predominantly affect paternally derived chromosomes (70.4%; P < 0.01) compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidies that more frequently affect maternally derived chromosomes (90.1%; P < 0.0001). Also, the frequency of meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) errors was established in meiotic trisomies; MI errors were observed to be more frequent (n = 102/147 [69.4%]) than MII errors (n = 45/147 [30.6%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Karyomapping is a robust method that is suitable for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease and for detecting meiotic aneuploidies, including meiotic segmental aneuploidies, and provides complex information about their parental origin. Our results revealed that segmental aneuploidy more frequently affects paternal chromosomes compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidy in human IVF embryos at the blastocyst stage.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Karyomapping; Meiotic errors; PGT–A; PGT–M; Segmental aneuploidy; Uniparental disomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30639160     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  14 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predicting embryonic aneuploidy rate in IVF patients using whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  Siqi Sun; Maximilian Miller; Yanran Wang; Katarzyna M Tyc; Xiaolong Cao; Richard T Scott; Xin Tao; Yana Bromberg; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.881

3.  Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

Authors:  Laura Girardi; Munevver Serdarogullari; Cristina Patassini; Maurizio Poli; Marco Fabiani; Silvia Caroselli; Onder Coban; Necati Findikli; Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Mustafa Bahceci; Rupali Chopra; Rita Canipari; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Ubaldi; Eva Hoffmann; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simon; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Direct Single-Cell Analysis of Human Polar Bodies and Cleavage-Stage Embryos Reveals No Evidence of the Telomere Theory of Reproductive Ageing in Relation to Aneuploidy Generation.

Authors:  Kara Turner; Colleen Lynch; Hannah Rouse; Vimal Vasu; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Exome sequencing links CEP120 mutation to maternally derived aneuploid conception risk.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Warif El Yakoubi; Aishee Bag; Jessica Landis; Yiping Zhan; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott; Xin Tao; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Biological and Clinical Significance of Mosaicism in Human Preimplantation Embryos.

Authors:  Ioanna Bouba; Elissavet Hatzi; Paris Ladias; Prodromos Sakaloglou; Charilaos Kostoulas; Ioannis Georgiou
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 7.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke; Veerle Berckmoes
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies.

Authors:  Rostislav Navratil; Jakub Horak; Miroslav Hornak; David Kubicek; Maria Balcova; Gabriela Tauwinklova; Pavel Travnik; Katerina Vesela
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Characteristics of the IVF Cycle that Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism.

Authors:  Lorena Rodrigo; Mónica Clemente-Císcar; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Vanessa Peinado; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.