Literature DB >> 30637963

A roadmap for high-throughput sequencing studies of wild animal populations using noninvasive samples and hybridization capture.

Lauren C White1, Claudia Fontsere2, Esther Lizano2, David A Hughes3,4, Samuel Angedakin1, Mimi Arandjelovic1, Anne-Céline Granjon1, Jörg B Hans1, Jack D Lester1, M Timothy Rabanus-Wallace5, Carolyn Rowney1, Veronika Städele1, Tomas Marques-Bonet2,6,7,8, Kevin E Langergraber9,10, Linda Vigilant1.   

Abstract

Large-scale genomic studies of wild animal populations are often limited by access to high-quality DNA. Although noninvasive samples, such as faeces, can be readily collected, DNA from the sample producers is usually present in low quantities, fragmented, and contaminated by microorganism and dietary DNAs. Hybridization capture can help to overcome these impediments by increasing the proportion of subject DNA prior to high-throughput sequencing. Here we evaluate a key design variable for hybridization capture, the number of rounds of capture, by testing whether one or two rounds are most appropriate, given varying sample quality (as measured by the ratios of subject to total DNA). We used a set of 1,780 quality-assessed wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) faecal samples and chose 110 samples of varying quality for exome capture and sequencing. We used multiple regression to assess the effects of the ratio of subject to total DNA (sample quality), rounds of capture and sequencing effort on the number of unique exome reads sequenced. We not only show that one round of capture is preferable when the proportion of subject DNA in a sample is above ~2%-3%, but also explore various types of bias introduced by capture, and develop a model that predicts the sequencing effort necessary for a desired data yield from samples of a given quality. Thus, our results provide a useful guide and pave a methodological way forward for researchers wishing to plan similar hybridization capture studies.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzees; conservation genomics; faecal samples; population genomics; target enrichment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30637963     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  10 in total

1.  Targeted genome-wide SNP genotyping in feral horses using non-invasive fecal swabs.

Authors:  Stefan Gavriliuc; Salman Reza; Chanwoori Jeong; Fitsum Getachew; Philip D McLoughlin; Jocelyn Poissant
Journal:  Conserv Genet Resour       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 0.991

2.  Population dynamics and genetic connectivity in recent chimpanzee history.

Authors:  Claudia Fontsere; Martin Kuhlwilm; Carlos Morcillo-Suarez; Marina Alvarez-Estape; Jack D Lester; Paolo Gratton; Joshua M Schmidt; Paula Dieguez; Thierry Aebischer; Paula Álvarez-Varona; Anthony Agbor; Samuel Angedakin; Alfred K Assumang; Emmanuel A Ayimisin; Emma Bailey; Donatienne Barubiyo; Mattia Bessone; Andrea Carretero-Alonso; Rebecca Chancellor; Heather Cohen; Emmanuel Danquah; Tobias Deschner; Andrew Dunn; Jef Dupain; Villard E Egbe; Olga Feliu; Annemarie Goedmakers; Anne-Céline Granjon; Josephine Head; Daniela Hedwig; Veerle Hermans; R Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar; Inaoyom Imong; Sorrel Jones; Jessica Junker; Parag Kadam; Mike Kaiser; Mbangi Kambere; Magloire V Kambale; Ammie K Kalan; Ivonne Kienast; Deo Kujirakwinja; Kevin Langergraber; Juan Lapuente; Bradley Larson; Anne Laudisoit; Kevin Lee; Manuel Llana; Miquel Llorente; Sergio Marrocoli; David Morgan; Felix Mulindahabi; Mizuki Murai; Emily Neil; Sonia Nicholl; Stuart Nixon; Emma Normand; Chris Orbell; Lucy J Ormsby; Liliana Pacheco; Alex Piel; Laura Riera; Martha M Robbins; Aaron Rundus; Crickette Sanz; Lilah Sciaky; Volker Sommer; Fiona A Stewart; Nikki Tagg; Luc Roscelin Tédonzong; Els Ton; Joost van Schijndel; Virginie Vergnes; Erin G Wessling; Jacob Willie; Roman M Wittig; Yisa G Yuh; Kyle Yurkiw; Klaus Zuberbuehler; Jochen Hecht; Linda Vigilant; Christophe Boesch; Aida M Andrés; David A Hughes; Hjalmar S Kühl; Esther Lizano; Mimi Arandjelovic; Tomas Marques-Bonet
Journal:  Cell Genom       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Differences in MHC-B diversity and KIR epitopes in two populations of wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Vincent Maibach; Kevin Langergraber; Fabian H Leendertz; Roman M Wittig; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Urine as a high-quality source of host genomic DNA from wild populations.

Authors:  Andrew T Ozga; Timothy H Webster; Ian C Gilby; Melissa A Wilson; Rebecca S Nockerts; Michael L Wilson; Anne E Pusey; Yingying Li; Beatrice H Hahn; Anne C Stone
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Ancestral mitogenome capture of the Southeast Asian banded linsang.

Authors:  Johanna L A Paijmans; Axel Barlow; Kirstin Henneberger; Joerns Fickel; Michael Hofreiter; Daniel W G Foerster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genomics of sex allocation in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Bart A Pannebakker; Nicola Cook; Joost van den Heuvel; Louis van de Zande; David M Shuker
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Noninvasive Genetic Assessment Is an Effective Wildlife Research Tool When Compared with Other Approaches.

Authors:  Miriam A Zemanova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  HuConTest: Testing Human Contamination in Great Ape Samples.

Authors:  Martin Kuhlwilm; Claudia Fontsere; Sojung Han; Marina Alvarez-Estape; Tomas Marques-Bonet
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Pedigree reconstruction and distant pairwise relatedness estimation from genome sequence data: A demonstration in a population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Lauren E Petty; Kathrine Phillippi-Falkenstein; H Michael Kubisch; Muthuswamy Raveendran; R Alan Harris; Eric J Vallender; Chad D Huff; Rudolf P Bohm; Jeffrey Rogers; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 10.  Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; W Chris Funk; Om P Rajora
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.185

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.