BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D) continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) use has been associated with lower risks for mortality and diabetes-related complications when compared to multiple daily injections. There are limited data on the effect of CSII on blood pressure (BP). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between CSII initiation and BP changes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational study including all adults with T1D who initiated CSII between 2001 and 2014. Mean systolic BP levels were calculated from values obtained up to 15 months before and up 15 months after CSII initiation. RESULTS: We studied 436 adults (46% male; mean [95% CI] age: 45 [36, 54] years, duration of diabetes: 20.3 [19.1, 21.5] years). CSII was associated with the following changes (post minus pre CSII levels) in mean (95% CI) SBP and DBP levels, respectively: whole cohort (N = 436): -2 (-1, -3), P < .001 and -2 (-1, -2), P < .001; those taking stable antihypertensive medication (n = 118): -4 (-6, -2), P < .001 and -2 (-3, -1), P < .001; antihypertensive treatment-naïve patients (n = 279): -1 (-2, 0), P = .147 and -1 (-2, 0), P = .002. In multivariate regression analysis including age, sex, diabetes duration, pre-CSII BP, HbA1c and weight changes, only pre-CSII BP showed an independent association with BP drop in all patients' groups. Once adjusted for pre-CSII BP there was no significant difference between those on antihypertensive drugs and antihypertensive treatment-naïve individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We showed BP reduction in association with CSII therapy particularly in those on antihypertensive medication. These original findings may partly explain the cardiovascular and mortality benefits associated with CSII therapy.
BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D) continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) use has been associated with lower risks for mortality and diabetes-related complications when compared to multiple daily injections. There are limited data on the effect of CSII on blood pressure (BP). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between CSII initiation and BP changes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational study including all adults with T1D who initiated CSII between 2001 and 2014. Mean systolic BP levels were calculated from values obtained up to 15 months before and up 15 months after CSII initiation. RESULTS: We studied 436 adults (46% male; mean [95% CI] age: 45 [36, 54] years, duration of diabetes: 20.3 [19.1, 21.5] years). CSII was associated with the following changes (post minus pre CSII levels) in mean (95% CI) SBP and DBP levels, respectively: whole cohort (N = 436): -2 (-1, -3), P < .001 and -2 (-1, -2), P < .001; those taking stable antihypertensive medication (n = 118): -4 (-6, -2), P < .001 and -2 (-3, -1), P < .001; antihypertensive treatment-naïve patients (n = 279): -1 (-2, 0), P = .147 and -1 (-2, 0), P = .002. In multivariate regression analysis including age, sex, diabetes duration, pre-CSII BP, HbA1c and weight changes, only pre-CSII BP showed an independent association with BP drop in all patients' groups. Once adjusted for pre-CSII BP there was no significant difference between those on antihypertensive drugs and antihypertensive treatment-naïve individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We showed BP reduction in association with CSII therapy particularly in those on antihypertensive medication. These original findings may partly explain the cardiovascular and mortality benefits associated with CSII therapy.
Authors: Jennifer Harrington; Alexia S Peña; Louise Wilson; Roger Gent; Kate Dowling; Peter Baghurst; Jennifer Couper Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Ravi Retnakaran; Jackie Hochman; J Hans DeVries; Helene Hanaire-Broutin; Robert J Heine; Vincent Melki; Bernard Zinman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: R Trevisan; P Fioretto; A Semplicini; G Opocher; F Mantero; S Rocco; G Remuzzi; A Morocutti; G Zanette; V Donadon Journal: Diabetes Date: 1990-03 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: G Lepore; D Bruttomesso; M Bonomo; A R Dodesini; S Costa; E Meneghini; A Corsi; I Nosari; R Trevisan Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: D Bruttomesso; D Crazzolara; A Maran; S Costa; M Dal Pos; A Girelli; G Lepore; M Aragona; E Iori; U Valentini; S Del Prato; A Tiengo; A Buhr; R Trevisan; A Baritussio Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Alexandre A da Silva; Jussara M do Carmo; Xuan Li; Zhen Wang; Alan J Mouton; John E Hall Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 5.223