Ming Gu1,2, Ping Zhao2, Shiying Zhang2, Shengjie Fan2, Li Yang3, Qingchun Tong4, Guang Ji1, Cheng Huang2. 1. Institute of Digestive Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. School of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3. Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Complexity Systems, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. 4. Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine and Program in Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The molecular mechanism for the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains elusive. Both farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signalling and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress contribute to the progression of NAFLD; however, it is not clear whether the actions of these two pathways are dependent on each other. Moreover, the pharmacological benefits and mechanism of betulinic acid (BA) in controlling metabolic syndrome and NAFLD are largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A reporter assay and a time-resolved FRET assay were used to identify BA as an agonist of the FXR. NAFLD was induced by a methionine and choline-deficient L-amino acid diet (MCD) and high-fat diet (HFD). The pharmacological effects of BA (100 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) and potential interactions between hepatic FXR activation and ER stress pathways were evaluated by FXR silencing, Western blot and RT-PCR analyses using control and FXR-/- mice. KEY RESULTS: Activation of the FXR inhibited intracellular PERK/EIF2α/ATF4 and CHOP signalling, thereby alleviating hepatic ER stress, whereas FXR silencing resulted in an opposite effect. Furthermore, we identified BA as an FXR agonist that effectively attenuated the progression of NAFLD and metabolic disorders in both HFD- and MCD diet-fed mice and restored the hepatocellular ER homeostasis by stimulating the FXR signalling pathway and blocking PERK/EIF2α signalling. In contrast, the effects of BA were attenuated in FXR-/- mice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our data demonstrate that pharmacological activation of the FXR by BA reduces hepatocellular ER stress and attenuates NAFLD in an animal model of hepatic steatosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The molecular mechanism for the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains elusive. Both farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signalling and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress contribute to the progression of NAFLD; however, it is not clear whether the actions of these two pathways are dependent on each other. Moreover, the pharmacological benefits and mechanism of betulinic acid (BA) in controlling metabolic syndrome and NAFLD are largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A reporter assay and a time-resolved FRET assay were used to identify BA as an agonist of the FXR. NAFLD was induced by a methionine and choline-deficient L-amino acid diet (MCD) and high-fat diet (HFD). The pharmacological effects of BA (100 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) and potential interactions between hepatic FXR activation and ER stress pathways were evaluated by FXR silencing, Western blot and RT-PCR analyses using control and FXR-/- mice. KEY RESULTS: Activation of the FXR inhibited intracellular PERK/EIF2α/ATF4 and CHOP signalling, thereby alleviating hepatic ER stress, whereas FXR silencing resulted in an opposite effect. Furthermore, we identified BA as an FXR agonist that effectively attenuated the progression of NAFLD and metabolic disorders in both HFD- and MCD diet-fed mice and restored the hepatocellular ER homeostasis by stimulating the FXR signalling pathway and blocking PERK/EIF2α signalling. In contrast, the effects of BA were attenuated in FXR-/- mice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our data demonstrate that pharmacological activation of the FXR by BA reduces hepatocellular ER stress and attenuates NAFLD in an animal model of hepatic steatosis.
Authors: Xing Li Wang; Lin Zhang; Keith Youker; Ming-Xiang Zhang; Jian Wang; Scott A LeMaire; Joseph S Coselli; Ying H Shen Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Umut Ozcan; Erkan Yilmaz; Lale Ozcan; Masato Furuhashi; Eric Vaillancourt; Ross O Smith; Cem Z Görgün; Gökhan S Hotamisligil Journal: Science Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xiaoying Liu; Grace L Guo; Bo Kong; David B Hilburn; Susan C Hubchak; Seong Park; Brian LeCuyer; Antony Hsieh; Li Wang; Deyu Fang; Richard M Green Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sungsoon Fang; Jae Myoung Suh; Shannon M Reilly; Elizabeth Yu; Olivia Osborn; Denise Lackey; Eiji Yoshihara; Alessia Perino; Sandra Jacinto; Yelizaveta Lukasheva; Annette R Atkins; Alexander Khvat; Bernd Schnabl; Ruth T Yu; David A Brenner; Sally Coulter; Christopher Liddle; Kristina Schoonjans; Jerrold M Olefsky; Alan R Saltiel; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Angelo A Izzo; Mauro Teixeira; Steve P H Alexander; Giuseppe Cirino; James R Docherty; Christopher H George; Paul A Insel; Yong Ji; David A Kendall; Reynold A Panattieri; Christopher G Sobey; S Clare Stanford; Barbara Stefanska; Gary Stephens; Amrita Ahluwalia Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 8.739