| Literature DB >> 30634550 |
María Blanco1,2, José Antonio Vázquez3,4, Ricardo I Pérez-Martín5,6, Carmen G Sotelo7,8.
Abstract
The small-spotted catshark is one of the most abundant elasmobranchs in the Northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Although its landings are devoted for human consumption, in general this species has low commercial value with high discard rates, reaching 100% in some European fisheries. The reduction of post-harvest losses (discards and by-products) by promotion of a full use of fishing captures is one of the main goals of EU fishing policies. As marine collagens are increasingly used as alternatives to mammalian collagens for cosmetics, tissue engineering, etc., fish skins represent an excellent and abundant source for obtaining this biomolecule. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of chemical treatment concentration, temperature and time on the extractability of skin collagen from this species. Two experimental designs, one for each of the main stages of the process, were performed by means of Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The combined effect of NaOH concentration, time and temperature on the amount of collagen recovered in the first stage of the collagen extraction procedure was studied. Then, skins treated under optimal NaOH conditions were subjected to a second experimental design, to study the combined effect of AcOH concentration, time and temperature on the collagen recovery by means of yield, amino acid content and SDS-PAGE characterization. Values of independent variables maximizing collagen recovery were 4 °C, 2 h and 0.1 M NaOH (pre-treatment) and 25 °C, 34 h and 1 M AcOH (collagen extraction).Entities:
Keywords: collagen; cosmetic applications; experimental designs; fish by-products; fish discards; response surface methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30634550 PMCID: PMC6356800 DOI: 10.3390/md17010040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Approximate composition (media ± standard deviation (SD)) expressed as percentage of dry weight of non-treated skin from the small-spotted catshark.
| Composition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | Protein | Lipid | Ash | |
| Non-treated skin | 62.22 ± 0.48 | 69.24 ± 0.67 | 2.72 ± 0.18 | 35.13 ± 0.26 |
Second-order equations describing the effect of temperature (T), time (t) and concentration of NaOH (M) on the efficiency of collagen recovery (%) from the skin of the small-spotted catshark. The coefficient of adjusted determination (R2adj) is also shown. Optimum (opt) values of each independent variable to obtain maximum responses are also shown.
| Polynomial Equations | R2adj | Topt (°C) | topt (h) | NaOHopt (M) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid | Collagen (%) = 87.9 + 26.2 × T + 14.4 × NaOH + 12.7 × t − 5.9 × T × NaOH × t − 7.9 − T2 − 9.6 × NaOH2 − 9.1 × t2 | 0.846 | 25 | 48 | 2 |
| Solid | Collagen (%) = 14.4 − 26.5 × T − 17.8 × NaOH − 14.9 × t + 3.7 × T × NaOH + 7.04 × T × t − 4.5 × NaOH × t + 6.6 × T × NaOH × t + 6.9 × T2 + 11.7 × NaOH2 + 9.3 × t2 | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 0.1 |
Figure 1Combined effect of alkali concentration (M), time (t) and temperature (T) on the removal of collagen from the skin of the small-spotted catshark. Collagen recovered in the solid fraction (a–c). Collagen recovered in the liquid fraction (d–f).
Figure 2Dialyzed (a) and lyophilized (b) collagens obtained in each of the 20 experiments developed for the acid-soluble collagen extraction stage experimental design.
Hydroxyproline (HPro), Proline (Pro) and Glycine (Gly) content in lyophilized extracted collagen obtained in each of the 20 experiments developed for the acid-soluble collagen extraction stage of the experimental design. Real values of independent variables are indicated, as well as the codified values (in brackets).
| N° Experiment | T (°C) | Acetic Acid (M) | t (h) | Micromole in Lyophilized Extracted Collagen | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHPro | Pro | Gly | ||||
| 1 | 8.26 ((−1)) | 0.36 (−1) | 11.33 (−1) | 65.12 | 102.24 | 367.69 |
| 2 | 20.74 ((1)) | 0.36 (−1) | 11.33 (−1) | 151.34 | 237.70 | 854.61 |
| 3 | 8.26 ((−1)) | 0.84 (1) | 11.33 (−1) | 87.58 | 137.44 | 494.40 |
| 4 | 20.74((1)) | 0.84 (1) | 11.33 (−1) | 144.44 | 226.88 | 815.48 |
| 5 | 8.26 ((−1)) | 0.36 (−1) | 38.67 (1) | 81.01 | 127.18 | 456.98 |
| 6 | 20.74 ((1)) | 0.36 (−1) | 38.67 (1) | 168.79 | 265.12 | 952.75 |
| 7 | 8.26 ((−1)) | 0.84 (1) | 38.67 (1) | 121.52 | 191.05 | 686.78 |
| 8 | 20.74 ((1)) | 0.84 (1) | 38.67 (1) | 174.42 | 274.06 | 985.54 |
| 9 | 4.00 (−1.682) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 68.59 | 107.72 | 387.32 |
| 10 | 25.00 (1.682) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 168.85 | 265.32 | 953.85 |
| 11 | 14.50 (0) | 0.20 (−1.682) | 25.00 (0) | 108.93 | 171.04 | 614.92 |
| 12 | 14.50 (0) | 1.00 (1.682) | 25.00 (0) | 155.82 | 244.70 | 879.74 |
| 13 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 2.00 (−1.682) | 71.32 | 112.12 | 403.03 |
| 14 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 48.00 (1.682) | 131.02 | 205.82 | 740.10 |
| 15 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 116.16 | 182.34 | 655.82 |
| 16 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 131.89 | 207.09 | 744.66 |
| 17 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 139.18 | 218.56 | 785.62 |
| 18 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 158.14 | 248.32 | 892.94 |
| 19 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 141.82 | 221.77 | 797.30 |
| 20 | 14.50 (0) | 0.60 (0) | 25.00 (0) | 134.02 | 210.51 | 756.67 |
Second-order equations describing the effect of temperature (T), time (t) and concentration of AcOH (M) on the collagen recovery by means of HPro, Gly, Pro, HPro + Pro and yield determination, from the skin of the small-spotted catshark. The coefficient of adjusted determination (R2adj) is also shown. Optimum values of each independent variable to obtain maximum responses are also shown.
| Polynomial Equations | R2adj | Topt (°C) | topt (h) | AcOHopt (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro (µmoles) = 214.4 + 52.1 × T + 16.2 × AcOH + 22.8 × t − 17.1 × t2 | 0.860 | 25 | 34.2 | 1 |
| HPro (µmoles) = 136.5 + 33.1 × T + 10.3 × AcOH + 14.5 × t − 10.9 × t2 | 0.860 | 25 | 34.2 | 1 |
| Gly (µmoles) = 770.7 + 187.1 × T + 58.3 × AcOH + 81.8 × t − 61.4 × t2 | 0.860 | 25 | 34.2 | 1 |
| HPro + Pro (µmoles) = 350.9 + 85.2 × T + 26.5 × AcOH + 37.2 × t − 28.0 × t2 | 0.860 | 25 | 34.2 | 1 |
| Yield (%) = 39.2 + 9.3 × T + 3.1 × AcOH + 4.1 × t − 3.4 × t2 | 0.853 | 25 | 34.2 | 1 |
Figure 3Combined effect of acetic acid (AcOH), time (t) and temperature (°C) on HPro released (a–c) and collagen yield (d–f) produced from S. canicula skins.
Figure 4SDS-PAGE (7%) showing acid-soluble collagen (ASC) obtained in each of the 20 experiments developed for the acid-soluble collagen extraction experimental design. MWM: molecular weight marker.
Figure 5Small spotted catshark skin sampling: Skins stretched and aligned on top of each other (a); selected central portions of skins (b); homogeneized cutsobtained from the selected central parts of skins using scissors and divided in three for sampling purposes (c); small pieces finally obtained using a scalper (d).
Experimental domain and codification of independent variables in the second-order rotatable designs developed for collagen extraction from S. canicula skin.
| Alkaline Pre-Treatment | Acid Extraction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coded Values | T (°C) | NaOH (M) | t (h) | T (°C) | AcOH (M) | t (h) |
| −1.68 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.20 | 2.0 |
| −1 | 8.3 | 0.49 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 0.36 | 11.3 |
| 0 | 14.5 | 1.05 | 25.0 | 14.5 | 0.60 | 25.0 |
| +1 | 20.7 | 1.61 | 38.7 | 20.7 | 0.84 | 38.7 |
| +1.68 | 25.0 | 2.00 | 48.0 | 25.0 | 1.00 | 48.0 |
| Codification: Vc = (Vn − V0)/ΔVn Decodification: Vn = V0 + (ΔVn × Vc) | ||||||
Figure 6Filtered and washed NaOH treated skins used for the acid-soluble collagen extraction stage of the experimental design.
Fisher F tests used to check the consistency of polynomial equations.
| The Model is Acceptable When: | |
|---|---|
| F1 = Model/Total error | F1 ≥ |
| F2 = (Model + Lack of fitting)/Model | F2 ≤ |
| F3 = Total error/Experimental error | F3 ≤ |
| F4 = Lack of fitting/Experimental error | F4 ≤ |
are the theoretical values to α = 0.05 with the corresponding degrees of freedom for numerator (num) and denominator (den). All fitting procedures, coefficient estimates and statistical calculations were performed on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.