Literature DB >> 3063429

A fundamental distinction in the analysis and interpretation of behavior.

J Hirsch1, M Holliday.   

Abstract

In 1935 the editor of this journal called attention to limitations inherent in the presentation of grouped or average data (Dunlap, 1935/1982). Because of contemporary misconceptions analogous to those Dunlap discussed, we clarify and emphasize the important distinction between the use of grouped data to demonstrate learning in a species and the reliable measurement of learning in identified individuals, as well as how best to assess the outcome of selective breeding with conditioning as the phenotype.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3063429     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.102.4.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  4 in total

1.  Learned suppression of photopositive tendencies in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eric Le Bourg; Christian Buecher
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

2.  The use of visual information by house flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: muscidae), foraging in resource patches.

Authors:  D Conlon; W J Bell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Further characterization of an aversive learning task in Drosophila melanogaster: intensity of the stimulus, relearning, and use of rutabaga mutants.

Authors:  Emmanuel Perisse; Geoffrey Portelli; Solène Le Goas; Elsa Teste; Eric Le Bourg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Learning in Plants: Lessons from Mimosa pudica.

Authors:  Charles I Abramson; Ana M Chicas-Mosier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.