Literature DB >> 30633307

Chemical concentrations in cell culture compartments (C5) - concentration definitions.

Jaffar Kisitu1,2, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou3, Marcel Leist1,2,4.   

Abstract

Some laboratory issues are taken for granted as they seem to be simple and not worth much thought. This applies to "concentrations of a chemical tested for bioactivity/toxicity". Can there be any issue about weighing a compound, diluting it in culture medium and calculating the final mass (or particle number)-to-volume ratio? We discuss here some basic concepts about concentrations and their units, addressing also differences between "dose" and "concentration". The problem of calculated nominal concentrations not necessarily corresponding to local concentrations (relevant for biological effects of a chemical) is highlighted. We present and exemplify different concentration measures, for instance those relying on weight, volume, or particle number of the test compound in a given volume; we also include normalizations to the mass, protein content, or cell number of the reference system. Interconversion is discussed as a major, often unresolved, issue. We put this into the context of the overall objective of defining concentrations, i.e., the determination of threshold values of bioactivity (e.g., an EC50). As standard approach for data display, the negative decadic logarithm of the molar concentrations (-log(M)) is recommended here, but arguments are also presented for exceptions from such a rule. These basic definitions are meant as a foundation for follow-up articles that examine the concepts of nominal, free, and intracellular concentrations to provide guidance on how to relate in vitro concentrations to in vivo doses by in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in order to advance the use of new approach methods (NAM) in regulatory decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BenchMarks; nominal concentration; NAM; cell culture; summary data; threshold value

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30633307     DOI: 10.14573/altex.1901031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  3 in total

1.  Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Emilio Benfenati; Francesca Caloni; P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera; Christophe Chesné; Mark T D Cronin; Joop De Knecht; Daniel R Dietrich; Sylvia E Escher; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Brenna Flannery; Matthias Herzler; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Bruno Hubesch; Hennicke Kamp; Jaffar Kisitu; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Simona Kovarich; Marcel Leist; Alexandra Maertens; Kerry Nugent; Giorgia Pallocca; Manuel Pastor; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Octavio Presgrave; Lena Smirnova; Michael Schwarz; Takashi Yamada; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.250

2.  Modeling Bioavailable Concentrations in Zebrafish Cell Lines and Embryos Increases the Correlation of Toxicity Potencies across Test Systems.

Authors:  Sebastian Lungu-Mitea; Carolina Vogs; Gunnar Carlsson; Maximiliane Montag; Kim Frieberg; Agneta Oskarsson; Johan Lundqvist
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  A novel 3D polycaprolactone high-throughput system for evaluation of toxicity in normoxia and hypoxia.

Authors:  Atena Malakpour-Permlid; Stina Oredsson
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-03-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.