Literature DB >> 30632193

Extreme learning machine Cox model for high-dimensional survival analysis.

Hong Wang1, Gang Li2.   

Abstract

Some interesting recent studies have shown that neural network models are useful alternatives in modeling survival data when the assumptions of a classical parametric or semiparametric survival model such as the Cox (1972) model are seriously violated. However, to the best of our knowledge, the plausibility of adapting the emerging extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithm for single-hidden-layer feedforward neural networks to survival analysis has not been explored. In this paper, we present a kernel ELM Cox model regularized by an L0 -based broken adaptive ridge (BAR) penalization method. Then, we demonstrate that the resulting method, referred to as ELMCoxBAR, can outperform some other state-of-art survival prediction methods such as L1 - or L2 -regularized Cox regression, random survival forest with various splitting rules, and boosted Cox model, in terms of its predictive performance using both simulated and real world datasets. In addition to its good predictive performance, we illustrate that the proposed method has a key computational advantage over the above competing methods in terms of computation time efficiency using an a real-world ultra-high-dimensional survival data.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  censored data; extreme learning machine; machine learning; regularized Cox model; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30632193      PMCID: PMC6498851          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  42 in total

1.  Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Authors:  E Graf; C Schmoor; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A general framework for neural network models on censored survival data.

Authors:  Elia Biganzoli; Patrizia Boracchi; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002-03

3.  Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Jiang Gui; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes.

Authors:  Guang-Bin Huang; Lei Chen; Chee-Kheong Siew
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2006-07

5.  Artificial neural network for the joint modelling of discrete cause-specific hazards.

Authors:  Elia M Biganzoli; Patrizia Boracchi; Federico Ambrogi; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Kernel Cox regression models for linking gene expression profiles to censored survival data.

Authors:  Hongzhe Li; Yihui Luan
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Prediction of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Fumiaki Sato; Yutaka Shimada; Florin M Selaru; David Shibata; Masato Maeda; Go Watanabe; Yuriko Mori; Sanford A Stass; Masayuki Imamura; Stephen J Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A practical application of neural network analysis for predicting outcome of individual breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; G M Clark
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David G Beer; Sharon L R Kardia; Chiang-Ching Huang; Thomas J Giordano; Albert M Levin; David E Misek; Lin Lin; Guoan Chen; Tarek G Gharib; Dafydd G Thomas; Michelle L Lizyness; Rork Kuick; Satoru Hayasaka; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer; Samir Hanash
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.

Authors:  Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A scoping methodological review of simulation studies comparing statistical and machine learning approaches to risk prediction for time-to-event data.

Authors:  Hayley Smith; Michael Sweeting; Tim Morris; Michael J Crowther
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Neena S Abraham; Xiaoxi Yao; Peter A Noseworthy; Jonathan Inselman; Nilay D Shah; Che Ngufor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

3.  eBreCaP: extreme learning-based model for breast cancer survival prediction.

Authors:  Arwinder Dhillon; Ashima Singh
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.615

4.  Fenchel duality of Cox partial likelihood with an application in survival kernel learning.

Authors:  Christopher M Wilson; Kaiqiao Li; Qiang Sun; Pei Fen Kuan; Xuefeng Wang
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 7.011

5.  A Simulation Study to Compare the Predictive Performance of Survival Neural Networks with Cox Models for Clinical Trial Data.

Authors:  Georgios Kantidakis; Elia Biganzoli; Hein Putter; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Default risk prediction and feature extraction using a penalized deep neural network.

Authors:  Cunjie Lin; Nan Qiao; Wenli Zhang; Yang Li; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Stat Comput       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.324

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.