Literature DB >> 19690023

Influence of trigger PSA and PSA kinetics on 11C-Choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.

Paolo Castellucci1, Chiara Fuccio, Cristina Nanni, Ivan Santi, Anna Rizzello, Filippo Lodi, Alessandro Franceschelli, Giuseppe Martorana, Fabio Manferrari, Stefano Fanti.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of (11)C-choline PET/CT (trigger PSA), PSA velocity (PSAvel), and PSA doubling time (PSAdt) on (11)C-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, who showed biochemical failure during follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 190 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer who showed an increase in PSA (mean, 4.2; median, 2.1; range, 0.2-25.4 ng/mL) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were studied with (11)C-choline PET/CT. Patients were grouped according to trigger PSA (PSA </= 1 ng/mL, 1 < PSA </= 2 ng/mL, 2 < PSA </= 5 ng/mL, and PSA > 5 ng/mL). In 106 patients, data were available for calculation of PSAvel and PSAdt. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether there was a relationship between PSA levels and PSA kinetics and the rate of detection of relapse using PET.
RESULTS: (11)C-choline PET/CT detected disease relapse in 74 of 190 patients (38.9%). The detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT was 19%, 25%, 41%, and 67% in the 4 subgroups-PSA </= 1 ng/mL (51 patients), 1 < PSA </= 2 ng/mL (39 patients), 2 < PSA </= 5 ng/mL (51 patients), and PSA > 5 ng/mL (49 patients)-respectively. Trigger PSA values were statistically different between PET-positive patients (median PSA, 4.0 ng/mL) and PET-negative patients (median PSA, 1.4 ng/mL) (P = 0.0001). Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis showed an optimal cutoff point for trigger PSA of 2.43 ng/mL (area under the curve, 0.76). In 106 patients, PSAdt and PSAvel values were statistically different between patients with PET-positive and -negative scan findings (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03). The (11)C-choline PET/CT detection rate was 12%, 34%, 42%, and 70%, respectively, in patients with PSAvel < 1 ng/mL/y (33 patients), 1 < PSAvel </= 2 ng/mL/y (26 patients), 2 < PSAvel </= 5 ng/mL/y (19 patients), and PSAvel > 5 ng/mL/y (28 patients). The (11)C-choline PET/CT detection rate was 20%, 40%, 48%, and 60%, respectively, in patients with PSAdt > 6 mo (45 patients), 4 < PSAdt </= 6 mo (20 patients), 2 < PSAdt </= 4 mo (31 patients), and PSAdt </= 2 mo (10 patients). There was no statistical difference between PET-positive and -negative scan detection rates according to the Gleason score, pT and N status, patient age, or duration between surgery and biochemical relapse. Trigger PSA and PSAvel were found to be independent predictive factors for a PET-positive result (P = 0.002; P = 0.04) and PSAdt was found to be an independent factor only in patients with trigger PSA less than 2 ng/mL (P = 0.05) using multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: The (11)C-choline PET/CT detection rate is influenced by trigger PSA, PSAdt, and PSAvel. This finding could be used to improve the selection of patients for scanning by reducing the number of false-negative scans and increasing the detection rate of disease in patients with early relapse and potentially curative disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19690023     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  74 in total

1.  [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elena Giulia Spinapolice; Federico Fallanca; Cinzia Crivellaro; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luigi Gianolli; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Non-FDG PET in oncology.

Authors:  R Núñez Miller; M A Pozo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Clinical impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan D Soyka; Marco A Muster; Daniel T Schmid; Burkhardt Seifert; Ulrike Schick; Raymond Miralbell; Sandra Jorcano; Kathrin Zaugg; Hans-Helge Seifert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Klaus Strobel; Niklaus G Schaefer; Daniela B Husarik; Thomas F Hany
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Comparison of integrated whole-body [11C]choline PET/MR with PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Toshiki Takei; Sebastian Fürst; Tobias Maurer; Florian Gaertner; Hans Geinitz; Alexander Drzezga; Sibylle Ziegler; Stephan G Nekolla; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  PET/MR in prostate cancer: technical aspects and potential diagnostic value.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Moeller; Sebastian Fürst; Konstantin Holzapfel; Tobias Maurer; Sibylle Ziegler; Stephan Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Furosemide diminishes ¹⁸F-fluoroethylcholine uptake in prostate cancer in vivo.

Authors:  H Christian Rischke; Teresa Beck; Werner Vach; Gesche Wieser; Anca L Grosu; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Philipp T Meyer; Cordula A Jilg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Do we have to withdraw antiandrogenic therapy in prostate cancer patients before PET/CT with [11C]choline?

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Christian Uprimny; Bernhard Nilica; Llanos Geraldo; Dorota Kendler; Alexander Kroiss; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Peter Lukas; Clemens Decristoforo; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti; Irene J Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.