| Literature DB >> 30628086 |
Seidu Adams1, Dongsheng Che1, Jiang Hailong1, Bao Zhao1, Han Rui1, Kofi Danquah2, Guixin Qin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom (POM) is an edible mushroom with rich nutritional components and vital pharmacological properties. The present study comprised 100 cross-bred piglets, weaned at 28 days old, who were randomly assigned to four POM diets with five replicates per diet and five piglets per pen.Entities:
Keywords: immunity; microbial composition; oyster mushroom; piglets; production performance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30628086 PMCID: PMC6593831 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sci Food Agric ISSN: 0022-5142 Impact factor: 3.638
Proximate analysis and GC/MS analysis of bioactive compounds in Pleurotus ostreatus (dry matter basis)
| Component | Relative proportion |
|---|---|
| Moisture (g kg−1) | 894.00 |
| Total protein (N × 6.25) (g kg−1) | 30.50 |
| Crude fat (g kg−1) | 3.00 |
| Crude fiber (g kg−1) | 18.00 |
| Ash (g kg−1) | 8.92 |
| Dry matter (carbohydrates) | 5.42 |
| Starch (g kg−1) | 7.00 |
| Nitrogen free extract (g kg−1) | 4.00 |
| Total phenolic content (mg GAE g−1) | 2.18 |
| Terpenoids (mg GAE g−1) | 1.05–9.99 |
| Fatty acid (mg GAE g−1) | 0.52–20.51 |
| Alcohols (mg GAE g−1) | 1.71 |
| Heterocyclic (mg GAE g−1) | 1.06 |
GAE, gallic acid equivalent.
Ingredient levels and chemical composition of experimental diets (g kg−1 as fed) fed to determine the effects of various levels of dietary supplementation of Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom on performance, immunity and fecal microbial composition and functions in weaning pigs
| Dietary POM level (g kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | |
| Ingredient level | ||||
| Cracked corn | 61.53 | 59.5 | 56.79 | 54.30 |
| Soybean meal | 20.90 | 18.63 | 14.40 | 14.63 |
| Fish meal | 3.66 | 3.66 | 3.46 | 2.30 |
| Whey powder | 3.41 | 3.41 | 4.35 | 4.35 |
| Fermented soybean meal | 6.50 | 8.20 | 12.00 | 12.92 |
| POM | 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 |
| Premix | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Chemical composition | ||||
| ME (MJ kg −1) | 10.39 | 10.27 | 10.36 | 10.13 |
| Crude protein | 19.91 | 19.93 | 19.86 | 19.89 |
| Methionine | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Lysine | 1.24 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.18 |
| Calcium | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| Available Phosphorus | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
POM; different dietary concentrations of P. ostreatus mushroom prepared by drying overnight at 60 °C and pulverized to pass through a 5 mm sieve. 0.00 g kg−1 POM, 5.00 g kg−1 POM, 10.00 g kg−1 POM and 15.00 g kg−1 POM.
Premix provides the following per kg: Vitamin A 130‐396 KIU, Kilo‐vitamin D 30–124 KIU, Vitamin E 400mg, Vitamin K2 40–150mg, vitamin B2 75–1500 mg, 4500–1500 mg, Iron 1500‐3700 ppm, Magnesium 400–3700 ppm, moisture 9%, sodium 6–14%, total Phosphorus 2.0 %, lysine 1.3 %, Calcium 10–20 %, Phytase 12500 U.
Performance and diarrhea incidence of weaning pigs fed diets containing different levels of POMa
| Dietary POM levels (g kg−1) | Polynomial contrasts ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
| |
| ADFI (g) | 497.11 | 411.27 | 497.34 | 553.85 | 4.73 | 0.0295 | 0.7942 | 1.0000 | 0.001 |
| ADG (g) | 285.64 | 191.71 | 289.57 | 469.21 | 15.44 | 0.3279 | 0.9842 | 1.0000 | 0.005 |
| FCR | 2.75 | 3.15 | 2.72 | 2.18 | 0.67 | 0.2607 | 0.9427 | 1.0000 | 0.005 |
| DIARRHEA (g) | 6.54 | 3.23 | 3.73 | 2.93 | 0.32 | 0.5138 | 0.8327 | 1.0000 | < 0.001 |
POM; different dietary concentrations of P. ostreatus mushroom prepared by drying overnight at 60 °C and pulverized to pass through a 5 mm sieve.
Polynomial contrasts (r 2).
ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio; DIARRHEA, diarrhea incidence in pigs.
Nutrient digestibility (g kg−1 as fed), pH and concentration of acetate (mmol L−1), butyrate (mmol L−1), propionate (mmol L−1) and total SCFA (mmol L−1) of weaning pigs fed diets containing different levels of POMa
| Dietary POM levels (g kg−1) | Polynomial contrasts ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
| |
| Crude protein | 70.75 | 76.12 | 86.22 | 75.14 | 1.20 | 0.2098 | 0.3331 | 0.9279 | 0.002 |
| Crude fiber | 60.02 | 73.89 | 74.59 | 66.90 | 2.44 | −0.161 | 0.9914 | 1.0000 | 0.003 |
| Ether extract | 69.06 | 74.99 | 74.41 | 88.45 | 1.43 | 0.8039 | 0.8851 | 1.0000 | 0.002 |
| Gross energy | 65.69 | 76.42 | 74.18 | 86.94 | 1.41 | 0.8200 | 0.8204 | 1.0000 | 0.003 |
| PH | 5.55 | 5.64 | 5.66 | 5.61 | 0.08 | 0.2681 | 0.5213 | 0.9462 | 0.135 |
| Acetate | 35.95 | 45.37 | 49.83 | 42.96 | 2.75 | 0.1225 | 0.9788 | 1.0000 | 0.010 |
| Propionate | 11.17 | 25.12 | 24.30 | 22.98 | 2.20 | 0.2381 | 0.9165 | 1.0000 | 0.017 |
| Butyrate | 9.13 | 10.39 | 11.14 | 13.35 | 1.22 | 0.9525 | 0.9783 | 1.0000 | 0.010 |
| Total SCFA | 56.25 | 80.88 | 85.27 | 79.29 | 5.69 | 0.3444 | 0.9899 | 1.0000 | 0.015 |
POM; different dietary concentrations of P. ostreatus mushroom prepared by drying overnight at 60 °C and pulverized to pass through a 5 mm sieve.
Polynomial contrasts (r 2).
Concentrations of IL‐2 (µg mL−1), TNF‐α (µg mL−1), IgA (µg mL−1), IgG (µg mL−1) and IgM (µg mL−1) of weaning pigs fed diets containing different levels of POMa
| Dietary POM levels (g kg−1) | Polynomial contrasts ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
| |
| IL‐2 | 632.03 | 846.10 | 1184.48 | 880.20 | 120.73 | 0.3011 | 0.8005 | 1.0000 | 0.030 |
| TNF‐α | 267.97 | 556.46 | 470.06 | 525.82 | 60.62 | 0.2676 | 0.7215 | 1.0000 | 0.002 |
| IgA | 159.07 | 180.23 | 167.50 | 165.83 | 6.95 | −0.375 | 0.5459 | 1.0000 | 0.026 |
| IgG | 8.66 | 9.55 | 9.61 | 9.39 | 2.37 | 0.2086 | 0.9724 | 1.0000 | 0.034 |
| IgM | 13.83 | 14.23 | 21.50 | 21.40 | 4.04 | 0.8061 | 0.8065 | 1.0000 | 0.013 |
IL‐2, interleukin‐2; TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor‐α; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M.
POM; different dietary concentrations of Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom prepared by drying overnight at 60 °C and pulverized to pass through a 5 mm sieve.
Polynomial contrasts (r 2).
Figure 1Showing the significant difference (P < 0.05) between the different treatment groups at the OTU reads. The colours represent the groups and the OTUs represent each organism.
Figure 2Showing the significant difference in relative abundance (P < 0.1) between the treatment groups and the control at the genus level. At the genus level, different colours represent the treatments. The relative abundance of g__Methylobacterium was significantly higher in the 0.00 g kg−1 POM compared to the treatment groups. The relative abundance of g_ Sphaerochaeta was significantly higher in the 5.00 g kg−1 POM treatment group compared to the other treatment.
Figure 3The rarefaction curves produced by the boxplots represent the number of sample sequences against the number of OTUs, and tended towards the saturation plateau.
Figure 4Showing the alpha diversity indices (wilcox.test function in R for both sets of samples and the kruskal.test function in R if more than two sets of samples were used). The observed species index (B) and the Chao index (A) reflect the species richness of the communities in the sample. The whole tree phylogenetic diversity index (C) reflects the species diversity of the communities affected by species richness and species evenness in the sample community. The Shannon index (D) reflects the difference in species preservation in the sample from evolutionary history.
Figure 5Showing the UniFrac distance distribution heat map with respect to clustering samples with similar beta diversity; the clustering UniFrac results reflects the similarity between samples. The UniFrac results are divided into two types: (A) (unweighted UniFrac) and (C) (weighted UniFrac). The weighted UniFrac considers the sequence abundance and the unweighted UniFrac does not consider the abundance. PCoA analysis [(B): Unweight_UniFrac] and [(D): Weight_UniFrac].
Figure 6Microbial composition and diversity within the taxa. A; represents the microbial composition in the Phylum level, B; represents microbial composition in the Class level, C; the represents microbial composition in the Order level, D; the represents microbial composition in the Family level, and E; the represents microbial composition in the Genus level.