PURPOSE: To evaluate initial response and overall survival of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases initially treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) using spherical particles of different sizes. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of 160 patients with NET liver metastases initially treated with TAE using < 100 µm (n = 77) or only ≥ 100 µm (n = 83) spherical particles. For each patient, we evaluated: initial response by mRECIST, time to progression, overall survival, complications, primary site, tumor grade and degree of differentiation, volume of liver disease, extrahepatic disease, NET-related symptoms, comorbidities, Child-Pugh score, performance status, lobar versus selective embolization, and arteriovenous shunting. RESULTS: Initial response was higher for TAE using particles < 100 versus TAE using only particles ≥ 100 μm (64 vs 42%, p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression showed that use of particles < 100 μm and liver < 50% replaced with tumor were independent predictors of a better initial response rate. There was no difference in major or minor complications between the two particle size groups. Median overall survival after TAE was 55 months for well- to moderately differentiated NET and 13 months for poorly differentiated or undifferentiated NET. There was no significant difference in survival between TAE patients treated with < 100 versus only ≥ 100-μm particles. CONCLUSION: NET patients treated with TAE using particles < 100 μm had better initial response, but the same overall survival, compared to TAE using only particles ≥ 100 μm.
PURPOSE: To evaluate initial response and overall survival of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases initially treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) using spherical particles of different sizes. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of 160 patients with NET liver metastases initially treated with TAE using < 100 µm (n = 77) or only ≥ 100 µm (n = 83) spherical particles. For each patient, we evaluated: initial response by mRECIST, time to progression, overall survival, complications, primary site, tumor grade and degree of differentiation, volume of liver disease, extrahepatic disease, NET-related symptoms, comorbidities, Child-Pugh score, performance status, lobar versus selective embolization, and arteriovenous shunting. RESULTS: Initial response was higher for TAE using particles < 100 versus TAE using only particles ≥ 100 μm (64 vs 42%, p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression showed that use of particles < 100 μm and liver < 50% replaced with tumor were independent predictors of a better initial response rate. There was no difference in major or minor complications between the two particle size groups. Median overall survival after TAE was 55 months for well- to moderately differentiated NET and 13 months for poorly differentiated or undifferentiated NET. There was no significant difference in survival between TAEpatients treated with < 100 versus only ≥ 100-μm particles. CONCLUSION: NET patients treated with TAE using particles < 100 μm had better initial response, but the same overall survival, compared to TAE using only particles ≥ 100 μm.
Authors: Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark O Baerlocher; Paul B Shyn; Bairbre L Connolly; A Michael Devane; Christopher S Morris; Alan M Cohen; Mehran Midia; Raymond H Thornton; Kathleen Gross; Drew M Caplin; Gunjan Aeron; Sanjay Misra; Nilesh H Patel; T Gregory Walker; Gloria Martinez-Salazar; James E Silberzweig; Boris Nikolic Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Karen T Brown; Richard K Do; Mithat Gonen; Anne M Covey; George I Getrajdman; Constantinos T Sofocleous; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Gerald P O'Neill; Kristian N Johnson; Alessandra R Garcia; Christopher Beattie; Binsheng Zhao; Stephen B Solomon; Lawrence H Schwartz; Ronald DeMatteo; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harpreet S Wasan; Peter Gibbs; Navesh K Sharma; Julien Taieb; Volker Heinemann; Jens Ricke; Marc Peeters; Michael Findlay; Andrew Weaver; Jamie Mills; Charles Wilson; Richard Adams; Anne Francis; Joanna Moschandreas; Pradeep S Virdee; Peter Dutton; Sharon Love; Val Gebski; Alastair Gray; Guy van Hazel; Ricky A Sharma Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Ivan K Ip; William Alago; Anne M Covey; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Majid Maybody; Raymond H Thornton; Stephen B Solomon; George I Getrajdman; Karen T Brown Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.682
Authors: Andrea C Cortes; Hideyuki Nishiofuku; Urszula Polak; Adeeb A Minhaj; Mirtha S Lopez; Kimihiko Kichikawa; Aliya Qayyum; Elizabeth M Whitley; Rony Avritscher Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 6.096
Authors: Yiming Liu; Haikuan Liu; Wenchuan Chen; Hang Yu; Wang Yao; Wenzhe Fan; Jiaping Li; Minhu Chen; Jie Chen; Yu Wang Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Rongzhi Wang; Rui Zheng-Pywell; H Alexander Chen; James A Bibb; Herbert Chen; J Bart Rose Journal: Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2019-10-24
Authors: Nicolas Voizard; Tiffany Ni; Alex Kiss; Robyn Pugash; Michael Jonathon Raphael; Natalie Coburn; Elizabeth David Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.677