| Literature DB >> 30627544 |
Qianru Li1, Qi Zhang2,3, Yehua Cai4, Yinghui Hua1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences of Achilles tendon (AT) hardness and morphology between asymptomatic tendons in patients with acute AT ruptures on the contralateral side and asymptomatic tendons in healthy people by using computer-assisted quantification on axial-strain sonoelastography (ASE).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30627544 PMCID: PMC6304598 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2367615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1An example for illustrating the computer-assisted quantification of tendon hardness on axial-strain sonoelastography (ASE). The imaging system provides dual-modality visualization in a full screen consisting of two parts: the right part depicts a greyscale B-mode image and the left is a composite colour image that is a pure colour elastogram overlaying the same B-mode image (a). The pure colour elastogram (b) is retrieved by subtracting the B-mode image from the composite image. The tendon borders are delineated by using interactive software (c). The pure colour elastogram is transformed to a greyscale image (d). The location of the tendon is depicted in a binary template (e).
Demographic data.
| Variable | Study group | Control group | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 27 / 6 | 14 / 5 | 0.726 |
| Age (years) | 35 (25-65) | 35 (27-58) | 0.493 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.64±2.84 | 23.81±2.15 | 0.900 |
| Included tendon (left/right) | 13 / 20 | 16 / 18 | 0.624 |
Comparisons of hardness between the study group and control group.
| Third | Hmean | Hsk | H20 | H50 | Hratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Study | 0.43±0.09 | -0.53±0.51 | 0.31±0.10 | 0.45±0.10 | 1.01±0.25 |
| Control | 0.50±0.07 | -1.09±0.51 | 0.40±0.10 | 0.53±0.08 | 1.20±0.23 | |
| p value | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | |
| Middle | Study | 0.42±0.06 | -0.46±0.42 | 0.31±0.08 | 0.44±0.07 | 0.97±0.19 |
| Control | 0.45±0.07 | -0.59±0.33 | 0.33±0.07 | 0.47±0.08 | 1.05±0.23 | |
| p value | 0.181 | 0.146 | 0.243 | 0.103 | 0.148 | |
| Distal | Study | 0.43±0.07 | -0.36±0.46 | 0.28±0.09 | 0.44±0.09 | 0.91±0.14 |
| Control | 0.43±0.05 | -0.22±0.35 | 0.27±0.06 | 0.44±0.08 | 0.91±0.13 | |
| p value | 0.793 | 0.174 | 0.767 | 0.979 | 0.959 |
Comparisons of morphological variables between the study group and control group.
| Third | THK (cm) | Area (cm2) | ECC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Study | 0.45±0.09 | 0.57±0.16 | 0.95±0.02 |
| Control | 0.41±0.06 | 0.50±0.12 | 0.96±0.01 | |
| p value | 0.047 | 0.058 | 0.132 | |
| Middle | Study | 0.53±0.13 | 0.68±0.25 | 0.93±0.03 |
| Control | 0.45±0.04 | 0.56±0.10 | 0.95±0.01 | |
| p value | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.001 | |
| Distal | Study | 0.47±0.09 | 0.83±0.27 | 0.97±0.01 |
| Control | 0.39±0.05 | 0.63±0.11 | 0.98±0.01 | |
| p value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.035 |