Sébastien Aubry1, Jean-Philippe Nueffer, Mickaël Tanter, Fabio Becce, Chrystelle Vidal, Fabrice Michel. 1. From the Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France (S.A., J.P.N.); I4S Laboratory, INSERM EA4268, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France (S.A., F.M.); ESPCI ParisTech, CNRS UMR7587, INSERM U979, Institut Langevin Ondes et Images, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (F.B.); Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM CIT808, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France (C.V.); and Department of Neuromuscular Examination and Diseases, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France (F.M.).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in viscoelastic properties between normal and pathologic Achilles tendons (ATs) by using real-time shear-wave elastography (SWE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from 25 symptomatic patients and 80 volunteers. One hundred eighty ultrasonographic (US) and SWE studies of ATs without tendonopathy and 30 studies of the middle portion of the AT in patients with tendonopathy were assessed prospectively. Each study included data sets acquired at B-mode US (tendon morphology and cross-sectional area) and SWE (axial and sagittal mean velocity and relative anisotropic coefficient) for two passively mobilized ankle positions. The presence of AT tears at B-mode US and signal-void areas at SWE were noted. RESULTS: Significantly lower mean velocity was shown in tendons with tendonopathy than in normal tendons in the relaxed position at axial SWE (P < .001) and in the stretched position at sagittal (P < .001) and axial (P = .0026) SWE. Tendon softening was a sign of tendonopathy in relaxed ATs when the mean velocity was less than or equal to 4.06 m · sec(-1) at axial SWE (sensitivity, 54.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.8, 74.4; specificity, 91.5%; 95% CI: 86.3, 95.1) and less than or equal to 5.70 m · sec(-1) at sagittal SWE (sensitivity, 41.7%; 95% CI: 22.1, 63.3; specificity, 81.8%; 95% CI: 75.3, 87.2) and in stretched ATs, when the mean velocity was less than or equal to 4.86 m · sec(-1) at axial SWE (sensitivity, 66.7%; 95% CI: 44.7, 84.3; specificity, 75.6%; 95% CI: 68.5, 81.7) and less than or equal to 14.58 m · sec(-1) at sagittal SWE (sensitivity, 58.3%; 95% CI: 36.7, 77.9; specificity, 83.5%; 95% CI: 77.2, 88.7). Anisotropic results were not significantly different between normal and pathologic ATs. Six of six (100%) partial-thickness tears appeared as signal-void areas at SWE. CONCLUSION: Whether the AT was relaxed or stretched, SWE helped to confirm and quantify pathologic tendon softening in patients with tendonopathy in the midportion of the AT and did not reveal modifications of viscoelastic anisotropy in the tendon. Tendon softening assessed by using SWE appeared to be highly specific, but sensitivity was relatively low.
PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in viscoelastic properties between normal and pathologic Achilles tendons (ATs) by using real-time shear-wave elastography (SWE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from 25 symptomatic patients and 80 volunteers. One hundred eighty ultrasonographic (US) and SWE studies of ATs without tendonopathy and 30 studies of the middle portion of the AT in patients with tendonopathy were assessed prospectively. Each study included data sets acquired at B-mode US (tendon morphology and cross-sectional area) and SWE (axial and sagittal mean velocity and relative anisotropic coefficient) for two passively mobilized ankle positions. The presence of AT tears at B-mode US and signal-void areas at SWE were noted. RESULTS: Significantly lower mean velocity was shown in tendons with tendonopathy than in normal tendons in the relaxed position at axial SWE (P < .001) and in the stretched position at sagittal (P < .001) and axial (P = .0026) SWE. Tendon softening was a sign of tendonopathy in relaxed ATs when the mean velocity was less than or equal to 4.06 m · sec(-1) at axial SWE (sensitivity, 54.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.8, 74.4; specificity, 91.5%; 95% CI: 86.3, 95.1) and less than or equal to 5.70 m · sec(-1) at sagittal SWE (sensitivity, 41.7%; 95% CI: 22.1, 63.3; specificity, 81.8%; 95% CI: 75.3, 87.2) and in stretched ATs, when the mean velocity was less than or equal to 4.86 m · sec(-1) at axial SWE (sensitivity, 66.7%; 95% CI: 44.7, 84.3; specificity, 75.6%; 95% CI: 68.5, 81.7) and less than or equal to 14.58 m · sec(-1) at sagittal SWE (sensitivity, 58.3%; 95% CI: 36.7, 77.9; specificity, 83.5%; 95% CI: 77.2, 88.7). Anisotropic results were not significantly different between normal and pathologic ATs. Six of six (100%) partial-thickness tears appeared as signal-void areas at SWE. CONCLUSION: Whether the AT was relaxed or stretched, SWE helped to confirm and quantify pathologic tendon softening in patients with tendonopathy in the midportion of the AT and did not reveal modifications of viscoelastic anisotropy in the tendon. Tendon softening assessed by using SWE appeared to be highly specific, but sensitivity was relatively low.
Authors: Johnny G Owens; Michelle R Rauzi; Andrew Kittelson; Jeremy Graber; Michael J Bade; Julia Johnson; Dustin Nabhan Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-04
Authors: Mihra S Taljanovic; Lana H Gimber; Giles W Becker; L Daniel Latt; Andrea S Klauser; David M Melville; Liang Gao; Russell S Witte Journal: Radiographics Date: 2017 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nakul Gupta; John S Labis; Joshua Harris; Michael A Trakhtenbroit; Leif E Peterson; Robert A Jack; Patrick C McCulloch Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: B Frankewycz; A Penz; J Weber; N P da Silva; F Freimoser; R Bell; M Nerlich; E M Jung; D Docheva; C G Pfeifer Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Andrea B Rosskopf; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Michael Lavagnino; Michelle E Wall; Dianne Little; Albert J Banes; Farshid Guilak; Steven P Arnoczky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.494