| Literature DB >> 30626274 |
Dominika Kwasnicka1,2, Jennifer Inauen3, Wim Nieuwenboom4, Johanna Nurmi5,6, Annegret Schneider7, Camille E Short8, Tessa Dekkers9, A Jess Williams10, Walter Bierbauer11, Ari Haukkala5, Federica Picariello12, Felix Naughton13.
Abstract
Theories of behaviour change and health behaviour change interventions are most often evaluated in between-person designs. However, behaviour change theories apply to individuals not groups and behavioural interventions ultimately aim to achieve within-person rather than between-group change. Within-person methodology, such as N-of-1 (also known as single case design), can circumvent this issue, though has multiple design-specific challenges. This paper provides a conceptual review of the challenges and potential solutions for undertaking N-of-1 studies in health psychology. Key challenges identified include participant adherence to within-person protocols, carry-over and slow onset effects, suitability of behaviour change techniques for evaluation in N-of-1 experimental studies, optimal allocation sequencing and blinding, calculating power/sample size, and choosing the most suitable analysis approach. Key solutions include involving users in study design, employing recent technologies for unobtrusive data collection and problem solving by design. Within-person designs share common methodological requirements with conventional between-person designs but require specific methodological considerations. N-of-1 evaluation designs are appropriate for many though not all types of interventions. A greater understanding of patterns of behaviours and factors influencing behaviour change at the within-person level is required to progress health psychology into a precision science. Video abstract: Supplementary Material 1.Entities:
Keywords: N-of-1; idiographic design; single case study; within-person design
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30626274 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1564627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Psychol Rev ISSN: 1743-7199