| Literature DB >> 30625992 |
Alejandro Marín-Lopez1,2, Eva Calvo-Pinilla3, Sandra Moreno4, Sergio Utrilla-Trigo5, Aitor Nogales6, Alejandro Brun7, Erol Fikrig8, Javier Ortego9.
Abstract
Arboviruses are arthropod-borne viruses that exhibit worldwide distribution and are a constant threat, not only for public health but also for wildlife, domestic animals, and even plants. To study disease pathogenesis and to develop efficient and safe therapies, the use of an appropriate animal model is a critical concern. Adult mice with gene knockouts of the interferon α/β (IFN-α/β) receptor (IFNAR(-/-)) have been described as a model of arbovirus infections. Studies with the natural hosts of these viruses are limited by financial and ethical issues, and in some cases, the need to have facilities with a biosafety level 3 with sufficient space to accommodate large animals. Moreover, the number of animals in the experiments must provide results with statistical significance. Recent advances in animal models in the last decade among other gaps in knowledge have contributed to the better understanding of arbovirus infections. A tremendous advantage of the IFNAR(-/-) mouse model is the availability of a wide variety of reagents that can be used to study many aspects of the immune response to the virus. Although extrapolation of findings in mice to natural hosts must be done with care due to differences in the biology between mouse and humans, experimental infections of IFNAR(-/-) mice with several studied arboviruses closely mimics hallmarks of these viruses in their natural host. Therefore, IFNAR(-/-) mice are a good model to facilitate studies on arbovirus transmission, pathogenesis, virulence, and the protective efficacy of new vaccines. In this review article, the most important arboviruses that have been studied using the IFNAR(-/-) mouse model will be reviewed.Entities:
Keywords: IFNAR(−/−) mice model; arbovirus; interferon; pathology; vaccines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30625992 PMCID: PMC6356211 DOI: 10.3390/v11010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Signal transduction by the type I IFN receptors in wild-type (WT) or IFNAR−/− mice. Transcription of IFN genes is induced rapidly in response to viral infection. Cells sense viruses using multiple signaling pathways that ultimately will activate several transcription factors and their subsequent translocation into the nucleus, resulting in the activation of type I IFN (IFNα/β) genes. In WT mice, the released type I IFN is bound by the specific receptors IFNAR1/IFNAR2 trigging phosphorylation of JAK1/TYK2 kinases that activate STAT1 and STAT2. Phosphorylated STAT1/STAT2 heterodimers bind IRF9 and the complex is translocated to the nucleus where it induces expression of ISGs with ISRE-dependent promoters. The expression of ISGs will induce an antiviral state to prevent viral infection. However, in IFNAR1−/− mice, the antiviral state is not created, and cells are more susceptible to be infected. JAK, Janus activated kinase; TYK2, tyrosine kinase 2, ISRE, IFN-stimulated response element; ISG, IFN-stimulated gene; OAS, oligoadenylate synthetase; MX, myxovirus resistance; ISG15, IFN-stimulated gene factor 15; TRIM, tripartite motif-containing proteins; IFITM, IFN-induced transmembrane proteins; IRF, IFN-regulatory factors; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; NF-κ B, nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells.
Summary of viruses that have used the IFNAR(−/−) mouse model to study pathology and vaccine efficacy.
| 9 | Serotype or Strain | Mortality | Clinical Signs | Vaccine Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rift Valley fever virus | ZH548, MP12, Clone 13 | Yes | Swollen and congested liver, acute hepatitis. Ruffled fur, hunched posture, and lethargy | DNA-Gn/Gc |
| Crimean Congo Fever Virus | IbAr 2000, IbAr 10200 | Yes | Labored breathing and porphyry around the nostrils and eyes. Organ pathology (liver and lymphoid tissue), thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, weight loss, ruffled fur, hunched posture, and lethargy. | CCHFV alum-adjuvanted vaccines, VLPs, DNA or viral vector vaccines (MVA and adenovirus) expressing nucleocapsid protein or glycoproteins |
| Schmallenberg virus | wild-type SBV (wtSBV), isolate BH80/11 | Partial (50%) | Weight loss, ataxia, and apathy. | DNA-Gn/Gc/N, DNA-N-terminal GC, recombinant-N-terminal GC |
| Dengue virus | DENV-1 | Yes | Severe dengue-like disease. | Live attenuated mutants in the 2′-O-methyltransferase (2′-O-MTase) of DENV-1 and DENV-2 |
| Yellow fever virus | Asibi or Angola73 | Yes | Viscerotropic disease. | ND |
| Zika virus | MP1751 | Yes | Severe disease, including hind limb weakness and paralysis. | Vaccinia-based single vector encoding polyprotein |
| West Nile virus | WNV strain 3000.0259 | Yes | Hunched posture, ruffled fur and reduced activities. Encephalitis. | RepliVAX WN, single-cycle West Nile vaccine |
| Japanese encephalitis virus | JaOArS982 | Yes | Slow movement, ataxia, piloerection, anorexia and continuous weight loss. | ND |
| Chikungunya virus | CHIKV-21 | Yes | Weakness of the limbs (loss of muscle tone) and lethargy. | VSV-CHIKV-E3-E2-6K-E1 |
| Sindbis virus | TR339 | Yes | Weight loss and fur ruffling. | ND |
| Venezuelan equine encephalitis | V-3000 | Yes | Pronounced hunching, lethargy, prostration, and death. | ND |
| Vesicular stomatitis virus | VSV Indiana | Yes | Neuropathy. | ND |
| Thogoto virus | Yes | Pathological lesions in the lungs, liver and intestine. | ND | |
| Bluetongue virus | BTV-1 | Yes | Splenomegaly, congested lung. Hunched posture, ruffled fur, conjunctivitis. | DNA, Herpesvirus Poxvirus, Baculovirus, and bacterial expressed proteins, Adenovirus |
| African horse sickness virus | AHSV-1 | Yes | Ruffled fur, lethargy, ocular discharges, hemorrhages in lung, splenomegaly, congestion of liver. | DNA, Poxvirus |
| Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus | EHDV-7 | Yes | Splenomegaly, necrotic foci in the liver. | ND |
* ND: Non-determined.
Summary of Bluetongue virus (BTV) vaccine studies evaluated in IFNAR(−/−) mouse model.
| Vaccine Based on | Protein Expressed | Protection against Homologous BTV | Protection against Heterologous BTV | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTV inactivated vaccine | - | Yes | Not determined | Calvo-Pinilla et al., 2009 [ |
| MVA virus | VP2 and VP5 | Partial | No | Calvo-Pinilla, 2009 [ |
| Bovine herpes virus | VP2 | Partial | No | Franceschi et al., 2011 [ |
| Equine herpes virus | VP2 and VP5 | Partial | No | Ma et al., 2012 [ |
| MVA virus | VP2, VP5, and VP7 | Yes | No | Calvo-Pinilla et al., 2009 [ |
| MVA virus | VP2, VP7, and NS1 | Yes | Yes | Calvo-Pinilla et al., 2012 [ |
| muNs microspheres | VP2, VP7, and NS1 | Yes | Partial | Marín-López et al., 2014 [ |
| Bacterial expressed proteins | VP2 domains | Yes | No | Mohd Jaafar et al., 2014 [ |
| Adenovirus | VP2, VP7, and NS3 | Yes | ND | Martín et al., 2015 [ |
| muNS/MVA virus | VP2, VP7, and NS1 | Yes | Yes | Marín-López et al., 2017 [ |
| MVA virus | NS1 | Yes | Yes | Marín-López et al., 2018 [ |
| DNA/Fowlpox virus | VP2 and VP5 | ND | ND | Li et al., 2015 [ |
| Baculovirus expressed proteins | VP2 alone or fused to APCH | ND | ND | Legisa et al., 2015 [ |
| Plant-produced protein | VP2 alone or VP2 B-cell epitope sequences | ND | ND | van Zyl et al., 2017 [ |
| Bacterial and baculovirus expressed proteins | VP2, VP3, VP7, NS2, truncated VP5 | ND | ND | Mohamed et al., 2018 [ |
* ND: Non-determined.